The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences
Abstract
The visual system can reliably identify objects even when the retinal image is transformed considerably by commonly occurring changes in the environment. A local learning rule is proposed, which allows a network to learn to generalize across such transformations. During the learning phase, the network is exposed to temporal sequences of patterns undergoing the transformation. An application of the algorithm is presented in which the network learns invariance to shift in retinal position. Such a principle may be involved in the development of the characteristic shift invariance property of complex cells in the primary visual cortex, and also in the development of more complicated invariance properties of neurons in higher visual areas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This idea of continuity is used in a great number of artificial neural networks and related models (Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002; Földiák, 2008; Mobahi et al., 2009).”
From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Földiák, 2008
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Feature Discovery by Competitive Learning*
Rumelhart, D. E., & Zipser, D. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_5 · Cited by 1,398
Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex
Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00239352 · Cited by 1,385
Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning
Földiák, P. (1990) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf02331346 · Cited by 541
Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex
Barlow, H. B., & Földiák, P. (1989) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 263
Learning translation invariant recognition in a massively parallel networks
Hinton, G. E. (1987) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-17943-7_117 · Cited by 179
A complex-cell receptive-field model
Spitzer, H., & Hochstein, S. (1985) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1985.53.5.1266 · Cited by 144
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Barlow H. B., 1989, Chap., 4, 54
- Sutton R. S., 1981, Psychol. RKV., 88, 135
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 660
The Time-Organized Map Algorithm: Extending the Self-Organizing Map to Spatiotemporal Signals
Wiemer, J. C. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603765202695 · Cited by 38
“, 2000), or more directly by a learning rule that superimposes past stimuli (Edelman & Weinshall, 1991; Földiak, 1991; Wallis & Bülthoff, 1999).”
BackgroundConvolutional spiking neural network model for robust face detection
Matsugu, M., Mori, K., Ishii, M., & Mitarai, Y. (2004) · International Conference on Neural Information Processing · doi:10.1109/iconip.2002.1198140 · Cited by 38
“A great number of approaches [ 3 ,13,10,5] have been taken for robustness in pattern recognition.”
BackgroundUnsupervised Learning using Sequential Verification for Action Recognition.Preprint
Misra, I., Zitnick, C. L., & Hebert, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 38
Statistical Models of Natural Images and Cortical Visual Representation
Hyvärinen, A. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01057.x · Cited by 36
“Another approach to natural images is based on temporal coherence or stability (Földiák, 1991; Hashimoto, 2003; Hurri and Hyvärinen, 2003; Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002).”
BackgroundRolls, E. T. (2021) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2021.686239 · Cited by 37
“A similar principle had been proposed for translation invariance (Földiák, 1991), but Rolls extended this to all types of invariance, and outlined how this could be set up in a hierarchical model (Rolls, 1992).”
MethodRao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1998) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/9/2/005 · Cited by 37
Hyvärinen, A., Khemakhem, I., & Morioka, H. (2023) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2023.100844 · Cited by 54
“Such an idea is well-known in the theory of linear BSS. 44,67,68 The nonstationarity is supposed to be slow compared to the sampling rate, allowing us to consider the distributions inside each segment to be constant over time and resulting in a piece-wise stationary process.”
BackgroundInvariant visual object recognition: biologically plausible approaches
Robinson, L., & Rolls, E. T. (2015) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-015-0658-2 · Cited by 36
“Bypresentingconsistentsequencesoftrans-forming objects, the cells in the network can learn to respond to the same object through all of its naturally transformed states, as described by Földiák (1991), Rolls (1992, 2012a), Wallis et al. (1993), and Wallis and Rolls (1997).”
BackgroundStringer, S. M., & Rolls, E. T. (2008) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2007.11.004 · Cited by 37
“…sought to explain how transform-invariant representations could arise through unsupervised training with real-world visual input are trace learning (Földiák, 1991; Rolls & Milward, 2000; Wallis & Rolls, 1997), and Continuous Transformation (CT) learning (Perry, Rolls, & Stringer, 2006; Stringer,…”
Revisiting Activation Regularization for Language RNNsPreprint
Merity, S., McCann, B., & Socher, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1708.01009 · Cited by 36
“This broad concept falls under the broad concept of slowness regularization (Hinton, 1989; Földiák, 1991; Luciw & Schmidhuber, 2012; Jonschkowski & Brock, 2015; Wen et al., 2015) which attempts to minimize L(f(xt), f(xt+1)) where L is a loss function describing the distance between f(xt) and…”
BackgroundLearning invariant representations and applications to face verification
Liao, Q., Leibo, J. Z., & Poggio, T. (2013) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 34
Why The Brain Separates Face Recognition From Object Recognition
Leibo, J. Z., Mutch, J., & Poggio, T. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 35
Wood, J. N., & Wood, S. M. W. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12595 · Cited by 35
“…temporal learning models in computational neuroscience, the brain builds invariant object representations by extracting smoothly changing features from the visual environment (DiCarlo et al., 2012; Feldman & Tremoulet, 2006; Földiák, 1991; Rolls, 2012; Stone, 1996; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002).”
BackgroundResultGetting real — sensory processing of natural stimuli
Einhäuser, W., & Peter König, B. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.03.010 · Cited by 37
Rolls, E. T., Tromans, J. M., & Stringer, S. M. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06486.x · Cited by 35
“The trace-learning rule (Fo¨ldia´k, 1991; Rolls, 1992; Wallis & Rolls, 1997; Rolls & Milward, 2000) encourages neurons to develop invariant responses to input patterns that tend to occur close together in time, because these are likely to be from the same object.”
Energy function for learning invariance in multilayerperceptron
Peng, Sha, L., Gan, & Yu, W. (1998) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el:19980161 · Cited by 35
Symmetry-adapted representation learning
Anselmi, F., Evangelopoulos, G., Rosasco, L., & Poggio, T. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.07.025 · Cited by 37
Learning viewpoint invariant perceptual representations from cluttered images
Spratling, M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.105 · Cited by 34
Emergence of Topography and Complex Cell Properties from Natural Images using Extensions of ICA
Hyvärinen, A., & Hoyer, P. O. (1999) · Cited by 34
Invariant object recognition with trace learning and multiple stimuli present during training
Stringer, S. M., Rolls, E. T., & Tromans, J. M. (2007) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/09548980701556055 · Cited by 33
“…transform invariant representations in a 1-layer competitive network through trace learning An approach to invariance learning, trace learning (Fo¨ldia´k 1991; Wallis and Rolls 1997; Rolls and Milward 2000; Rolls and Stringer 2001), relies on the temporal continuity of visual stimuli in the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvariant Global Motion Recognition in the Dorsal Visual System: A Unifying Theory
Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.1.139 · Cited by 33
“LETTER Communicated by Ralph M. Siegel”
Spatio-temporal influences at the neural level of object recognition
Wallis, G. M. (1998) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/9/2/007 · Cited by 33
A general-purpose mechanism of visual feature association in visual word identification and beyond
Vidal, Y., Viviani, E., Zoccolan, D., & Crepaldi, D. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.017 · Cited by 36
Cox, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2142-08.2008 · Cited by 31
Learning Complex Cell Invariance from Natural Videos: A Plausibility Proof
Masquelier, T., Serre, T., Thorpe, S. J., & Poggio, T. (2007) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada477541 · Cited by 32
Invariant Representations of Objects in Natural Scenes in the Temporal Cortex Visual Areas
Rolls, E. T. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-73021-7_3 · Cited by 31
“(Note that this differs from the global " winner-take-all " paradigm implemented by Földiák 1991.)”
BackgroundMethodOnline Kernel Slow Feature Analysis for Temporal Video Segmentation and Tracking
Liwicki, S., Zafeiriou, S. P., & Pantić, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2428052 · Cited by 30
“A. Related Research 1) SFA in Computer Vision: Inspired by the slowness principle of neural networks [7], [5] employs SFA for invariant localization and recognition.”
BackgroundEscalante-B., A. N., & Wiskott, L. (2013) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · doi:10.5555/2567709.2627675 · Cited by 31
“This principle has probably first been formulated by Hinton (1989), and online learning rules were developed shortly after by Földiák (1991) and Mitchison (1991).”
BackgroundLearning Visual Spatial Pooling by Strong PCA Dimension Reduction
Hosoya, H., & Hyvärinen, A. (2016) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00843 · Cited by 30
Humans and Deep Networks Largely Agree on Which Kinds of Variation Make Object Recognition Harder
Kheradpisheh, S. R., Ghodrati, M., Ganjtabesh, ., & Masquelier, T. (2016) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00092 · Cited by 31
Deep Insights into Convolutional Networks for Video Recognition
Feichtenhofer, C., Pinz, A. J., Wildes, R. P., & Zisserman, A. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01225-w · Cited by 30
“For learning general representations from video in an unsupervised manner, minimizing the variation across time is seen both in biological, e.g. Földiák (1991), Wiskott and Sejnowski (2002), and arti-ficial, e.g. Goroshin et al. (2015) systems.”
MethodVisual Recognition and Inference Using Dynamic Overcomplete Sparse Learning
Murray, J. F., & Kreutz-Delgado, K. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.9.2301 · Cited by 30
The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects
Wallis, G. M. (2002) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280143000412 · Cited by 30
“According to the learning scheme used in earlier models ( Foldiak, 1991; Wallis, 1996), the strength of the training signal which a neuron receives, and hence the size of the change in appearance that it will be able to accommodate in one step, is dependent on the amount of time it has responded strongly to stimuli in…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialUsing domain‐general principles to explain children's causal reasoning abilities
McClelland, J. L., & Thompson, R. M. (2007) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00586.x · Cited by 30
“invariant object representations have been proposed Foldiak (1991) ; O’Reilly and Johnson (1994), which”
BackgroundEnhanced learning of natural visual sequences in newborn chicks
Wood, J. N., Prasad, A., Goldman, J. G., & Wood, S. M. W. (2016) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-016-0982-5 · Cited by 29
A domain-relevant framework for the development of face processing
Scott, L. S., & Arcaro, M. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00152-5 · Cited by 33
Berkes, P., & Wiskott, L. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46084-5_14 · Cited by 29
“One of the proposed principles is known as temporal coherence or temporal smoothness [1,2,3,4].”
BackgroundMatteucci, G., & Zoccolan, D. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba3742 · Cited by 31
Nonlinear dimensionality reduction using a temporal coherence principle
Huang, Y., Zhao, J., Liu, Y., Luo, S., Zou, Q., & Tian, M. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.001 · Cited by 28
The Invariance Hypothesis Implies Domain-Specific Regions in Visual Cortex
Leibo, J. Z., Liao, Q., Anselmi, F., & Poggio, T. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004390 · Cited by 30
“, [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68]).”
A recurrent model of transformation invariance by association
Elliffe, M. C. M., Rolls, E. T., Parga, N., & Renart, A. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00096-9 · Cited by 27
Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
Spratling, M. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.12.1144 · Cited by 27
“…(Swindale, 1996; von der Malsburg, 1973; F ¨ oldi ´ ak, 1989, 1990; Marshall, 1995; Sirosh and Miikkulainen, 1994; Oja, 1989; Sanger, 1989; O’Reilly, 1998; Rumelhart and Zipser, 1985; Kohonen, 1997; Grossberg, 1987; Ritter et al., 1992; Hertz et al., 1991; F ¨ oldi ´ ak, 1991; Wallis, 1996).”
Duff, A., Rennó‐Costa, C., Marcos, E., Luvizotto, A., Giovannucci, A., Sánchez-Fibla, M., Bernardet, U., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2009) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05181-4_2 · Cited by 26
“Using this approach, it has been shown that optimally sparse representations resembling so-called simple cells [48, 37] and optimally stable representations giving rise to complex cells [80, 18, 83] can be learned from visual stimulus consistent with physiology of the primary visual cortex V1.”
BackgroundPoggio, T., Mutch, J., Leibo, J. Z., Rosasco, L., & Tacchetti, A. (2012) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 25
Population Code Dynamics in Categorical Perception
Tajima, C. I., Tajima, S., Koida, K., Komatsu, H., Aihara, K., & Suzuki, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep22536 · Cited by 26
Competitive Anti-Hebbian Learning of Invariants
Schraudolph, N. N., & B, T. J. S. A. (1991) · Cited by 26
Improving classifiers with unlabeled weakly-related videos
Leistner, C., Godec, M., Schulter, S., Saffari, A., Werlberger, M., & Bischof, H. (2011) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995475 · Cited by 25
“This is also related to previous approaches that try to train neural networks via exploiting the spatial continuity of moving objects [14, 38, 8].”
BackgroundRolls, E. T., & Webb, T. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00085 · Cited by 25
“• A modified associative (Hebb-like) learning rule incorporating a temporal trace of each neuron’s previous activity, which, it has been shown (Földiák, 1991; Rolls, 1992; Wallis et al., 1993; Wallis and Rolls, 1997; Rolls and Milward, 2000; Rolls, 2012), enables the neurons to learn transform…”
BackgroundMethodJust One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1997) · Cited by 25
Liu, T. (2007) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5778 · Cited by 25
“These are also scenarios under which temporal association is presumed to operate (Edelman and Weinshall 1991; Fo« ldiak 1991; Wallis and Bu« lthoff 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning the Nonlinearity of Neurons from Natural Visual Stimuli
Kayser, C., Kording, K. P., & Peter König, B. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/08997660360675026 · Cited by 25
Stringer, S. M., & Rolls, E. T. (2006) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/09548980601004032 · Cited by 24
“For η = 0 the trace becomes just the present firing rate, and as η is increased the contribution of preceding firing at times earlier than the current timestep is increased (Földiák 1991; Stringer et al. 2000a, 2000b; Rolls & Deco 2002).”
BackgroundHow cortical neurons help us see: visual recognition in the human brain
Blumberg, J., & Kreiman, G. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci42161 · Cited by 27
“3 , 108, 132–134 ).”
Toward a self-organizing pre-symbolic neural model representing sensorimotor primitives
Zhong, J., Cangelosi, A., & Wermter, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00022 · Cited by 23
“The terms of the horizontal products of both pathways can be presented as follows: xvk = ∑ j svj u v kj; xdk = ∑ l sdl u d kl (6) The output of the two streams composes a horizontal product for the network output as we defined in Equation (1).”
BackgroundMultiscale analysis of slow-fast neuronal learning models with noise
Galtier, M., & Wainrib, G. (2012) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/2190-8567-2-13 · Cited by 23
“As Földiàk suggested in [27], it makes sense to consider the learning equation as being dW dt = −κW + (v ∗ g1) ⊗ (v ∗ g1), where ∗ is the convolution and g1 : t ∈ R → β1e−β1tH(t).”
What have We Learned from Deep Representations for Action Recognition?
Pinz, A. J., Zisserman, A., Wildes, R. P., & Feichtenhofer, C. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00818 · Cited by 45
Transformation-invariant visual representations in self-organizing spiking neural networks
Evans, B. D. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00046 · Cited by 23
“Trace learning utilizes the temporal continuity of objects in the world to learn transformation-invariant representations (Földiák, 1991).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInformation maximization in face processing
Bartlett, M. S. (2007) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.025 · Cited by 23
“models of learning invariances from spatiotemporal dependencies (e.g. [10, 12, 28 , 56, 66, 77]).”
Wiskott, L. (1999) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(99)00011-9 · Cited by 23
“The approach described in this paper is conceptually most closely related to work by Földiák (1991),Mitchison (1991), Becker & Hinton (1995) and Stone (1996).”
MethodNeurons with Two Sites of Synaptic Integration Learn Invariant Representations
Kording, K. P., & Peter König, B. (2001) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976601317098547 · Cited by 23
Complex Feature Recognition: A Bayesian Approach for Learning to Recognize Objects
Viola, P. A. (1996) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 23
Generating feature spaces for linear algorithms with regularized sparse kernel slow feature analysis
Böhmer, W., Grünewälder, S., Nickisch, H., & Obermayer, K. (2012) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-012-5300-0 · Cited by 22
“The last degree of freedom is eliminated by demanding order (Equation 10), leading to the following constraints: The principle of slowness, although not the above definition, has been used very early in the context of neural networks (F¨oldi´ak, 1991; Becker and Hinton, 1992).”
BackgroundNovel Biologically Inspired Approaches to Extracting Online Information from Temporal Data
Malik, Z. K., Hussain, A., & Wu, Q. M. J. (2014) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-014-9257-0 · Cited by 21
“In [9], the author has proposed a novel learning method which allows the network to learn transformation invariance by introducing a modified Hebbian learning approach between the simple and complex units which is a good way to implement positional invariance criteria but still the method is not able to extract invari…”
MethodConstruction of approximation spaces for reinforcement learning
Böhmer, W., Grünewälder, S., Shen, Y. C., Musial, M., & Obermayer, K. (2013) · Cited by 21
Task-dependent recurrent dynamics in visual cortex
Tajima, S., Koida, K., Tajima, C. I., Suzuki, H., Aihara, K., & Komatsu, H. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.26868 · Cited by 21
“In our analysis, a maximum-likelihood decoder (Földiák, 1991; Sanger, 1996; Jazayeri and Movshon, 2006; Ma et al., 2006; Graf et al., 2011; Fetsch et al., 2011) of the stimulus was constructed based on the neural responses in the discrimination task and then applied to the data for categorization task to reconstruct t…”
MethodTemporal chunking as a mechanism for unsupervised learning of task-sets
Bouchacourt, F., Palminteri, S., Koechlin, É., & Ostojic, S. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50469 · Cited by 22
Bray, A. J., & Martinez, D. (2002) · Cited by 21
Vision, emotion and memory: from neurophysiology to computation
Rolls, E. T. (2003) · International Congress Series · doi:10.1016/s0531-5131(03)00981-6 · Cited by 21
“The learning process involves what is essentially a simple Hebbian associative learning rule, but which includes a short memory trace of preceding neuronal activity (in, for example, the post-synaptic term) [28,79,106,110,133].”
BackgroundThe Sparse Manifold TransformPreprint
Chen, Y., Paiton, D. M., & Olshausen, B. A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08887 · Cited by 21
“The general idea of imposing a ‘slowness prior’ was initially proposed by [20] and [59] to extract invariant or slowly varying features from temporal sequences rather than using static orderless data points.”
BackgroundContinuous transformation learning of translation invariant representations
Perry, G., Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2309-0 · Cited by 20
“CT learning is compared in Experiment 2 with another approach to invariance learning, trace learning, and we summarize next the trace learning procedure developed and analyzed previously (Fo¨ldia´k 1991; Rolls 1992; Wallis and Rolls 1997; Rolls and Milward 2000; Rolls and Stringer 2001).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRolls, E. T. (2001) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524885.003.0004 · Cited by 22
Learning receptive field properties of complex cells in V1
Lian, Y., Almasi, A., Grayden, D. B., Kameneva, T., Burkitt, A. N., & Hamish Meffin, A. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007957 · Cited by 22
“Using the concept of the trace rule, where the response is determined by the current and past responses [38], the average of N sets of simple cell responses is then used as the input to the complex cells; i.”
MethodBootstrap Motion Forecasting With Self-Consistent Constraints
Ye, M., Xu, J., Xu, X., Wang, T., Cao, T., & Chen, Q. (2023) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00781 · Cited by 20
“Other works [1, 14, 38, 42, 52, 45] apply consistency constraints to predictions from the same input with different transformations in order to obtain perturbation-invariant representations.”
MethodIndependent Component Analysis
Du, K.-L., & Swamy, M. N. S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5571-3_14 · Cited by 20
Neural basis for the perception of goal-directed actions
Jellema, T., & Perrett, D. I. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203311875-10 · Cited by 26
Slow Feature Analysis: Perspectives for Technical Applications of a Versatile Learning Algorithm
Escalante-B., A. N., & Wiskott, L. (2012) · Künstliche Intell. · doi:10.1007/s13218-012-0190-7 · Cited by 20
“This principle has probably first been formulated by Hinton [13] and online learning rules were developed shortly after [9, 22].”
BackgroundImproved Binocular Vergence Control via a Neural Network That Maximizes an Internally Defined Reward
Wang, Y., & Shi, B. E. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2011.2128318 · Cited by 19
“In order to relax these constraints, we have recently demonstrated that finding a policy that maximizes the total response across the entire population of disparity neurons used to represent disparity leads to the autonomous development of vergence control to maintain fixation [29].”
BackgroundMethodRepresentation Learning in Sensory Cortex: A Theory
Anselmi, F., & Poggio, T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3208603 · Cited by 20
“) and a complex cell may develop is to invoke a Hebbian trace rule ([35], see also [10], [89]).”
BackgroundSelf-Organization in the Basal Ganglia with Modulation of Reinforcement Signals
Nakahara, H., Амари, Ш.-И., & Hikosaka, O. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602317318974 · Cited by 19
“Various types of self-organization rules have been proposed to investigate mainly the cerebral cortical formation (von der Malsburg, 1973; Amari & Takeuchi, 1978; Willshaw & von der Malsburg, 1979; Bienenstock, Cooper, & Munro, 1982; Obermayer, Ritter, & Schulten, 1990; Földiák, 1991).”
BackgroundHurri, J., & Hyvärinen, A. (2003) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/14/3/308 · Cited by 19
Slowness and Sparseness Have Diverging Effects on Complex Cell Learning
Lies, J.-P., Häfner, R., & Bethge, M. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003468 · Cited by 18
Invariant Pattern Recognition using Bayesian Inference on Hierarchical Sequences
George, D. (2004) · Cited by 18
Learning Synaptic Clusters for Nonlinear Dendritic Processing
Spratling, M., & Hayes, G. M. (2000) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1023/a:1009634821039 · Cited by 18
“input translations [10] it was used with (two layers of) linear units in which case it is only possible to learn invariances if there is little overlap between patterns [11] and the node will incorrectly respond if the input consists of partial patterns from different translational positions.”
MethodOkamura, J., Yamaguchi, R., Honda, K., Wang, G., & Tanaka, K. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1898-14.2014 · Cited by 20
“It has been proposed that different views of each object become associated with one another when they are experienced in succession during rotation (Földiák, 1991; Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002; Wyss et al., 2006; Masquelier and Thorpe, 2007).”
BackgroundBiederman and Cooper's 1991 Paper
Biederman, I., Cooper, E. E., Kourtzi, Z., Sinha, P., & Wagemans, J. P. (2009) · Perception · doi:10.1068/pmkbie · Cited by 19
“Experience with the statistical regularities in natural scenes has been proposed as a potential solution to this problem (Foldiak 1991; Ullman and Soloviev 1999; Wallis and Bu« lthoff 2001; Wallis and Rolls 1997; Wiskott and Sejnowski 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-organization of shift-invariant receptive fields
Fukushima, K., & Yoshimoto, K. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0098239 · Cited by 18
Columnar Organization in the Inferotemporal Cortex
Tanaka, K. (1997) · Cerebral cortex · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9625-4_11 · Cited by 18
Learning invariant features using inertial priors
Dean, T. (2007) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10472-006-9039-9 · Cited by 18
“• Fukushima [22] and Földiák [19] suggest that units within each level of the hierarchy form composite features from the conjunction of simpler features at lower levels to achieve shift-and scale-invariant pattern recognition.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSparse Spatiotemporal Coding for Activity Recognition
Dean, T., Corrado, G. S., & Washington, R. (2010) · Cited by 17
An edge-simplicity bias in the visual input to young infants
Anderson, E. M., Candy, T. R., Gold, J. M., & Smith, L. B. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj8571 · Cited by 21
“By the principles of slow feature analysis ( 37 – 39 ), slow change in inputs that consist principally of sparse edge patterns would be expected to be optimal for a system learning to extract edges.”
BackgroundSoto, F. A., Siow, J. Y. M., & Wasserman, E. A. (2012) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.004 · Cited by 17
“Several learning algorithms have been proposed that can achieve invariance learning (e.g., Foldiák, 1991; Stringer et al., 2006; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002), most of them based on the same general idea: objects in the world tend to remain present for several seconds, but changes in the position of…”
Raman, R., & Hosoya, H. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0945-x · Cited by 18
“While spatial statistics can explain well position or phase invariance in early vision 32,42,43 , temporal coherence 44 for learning the most slowly changing features has been commonly used for explaining more complex invariance properties in higher vision 36,45,46 and experimentally tested 47 .”
BackgroundModelling tonal attraction: tonal hierarchies, interval cycles, and quantum probabilities
Blutner, R. (2015) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1801-7 · Cited by 17
“This is a case of symmetry breaking by learning, which is prominently investigated in connectionist modelling (e.g., Földiák 1991).”
BackgroundYamashita, W., Wang, G., & Tanaka, K. (2010) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07057.x · Cited by 18
“…different views of the same object and ⁄ or experiencing their successive appearance may be necessary for recognition across larger changes in viewing angle (Foldiak, 1991; Wallis & Bülthoff, 2001; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002; Stringer & Rolls, 2006; Wyss et al., 2006; Masquelier & Thorpe, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialMultinomial Bayesian Learning for Modeling Classical and Nonclassical Receptive Field Properties
Hosoya, H. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00310 · Cited by 15
“Since temporal structure is known to help acquire invariance, we plan to incorporate trace learning into our learning algorithm (F¨oldiak, 1991; Hurri & Hyv¨arinen, 2003; Stringer, Rolls, & Tromans, 2007; Cadieu & Olshausen, 2009).”
BackgroundAcquisition of the Head-Centered Peri-Personal Spatial Representation Found in VIP Neuron
Fuke, S., Ogino, M., & Asada, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development · doi:10.1109/tamd.2009.2031013 · Cited by 17
“Therefore, for example, we will try to apply the trace rule [29] that is a modified Hebbian rule and changes synaptic weights according to both the current”
MethodLearning Generic Invariances in Object Recognition: Translation and Scale
Leibo, J. Z., Mutch, J., Rosasco, L., Ullman, S., & Poggio, T. (2010) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 17
A Canonical Microfunction for Learning Perceptual Invariances
Stone, J. V. (1996) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p250207 · Cited by 16
“The potential of Gibson's approach has recently begun to be realised as a series of connectionist models (Becker & Hinton, 1992; Becker, 1992; Zemel & Hinton, 1991; Foldiak, 1991; Schraudolph & Sejnowski, 1991; Mitchison, 1991; Phillips, Kay, & Smyth, 1995).”
BackgroundLearning generalisation and localisation: Competition for stimulus type and receptive field
Oram, M. W., & Földiák, P. (1996) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/0925-2312(95)00099-2 · Cited by 17
Unsupervised learning of mid-level visual representations
Matteucci, G., Piasini, E., & Zoccolan, D. (2023) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2023.102834 · Cited by 19
“Another intriguing possibility is that such extended lingering of postsynaptic activity may reflect the existence of mechanisms allowing higher-order neurons to deploy the “trace” learning rule at the base of UTL [10] over longer integration times.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Földiák, P.
- Affiliations
- Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, U.K.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-200
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2096388912
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- invariance learning, transformation sequences, translation invariance, local learning rules, visual object recognition, complex cells, primary visual cortex, visual system development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review