The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences
Abstract
The visual system can reliably identify objects even when the retinal image is transformed considerably by commonly occurring changes in the environment. A local learning rule is proposed, which allows a network to learn to generalize across such transformations. During the learning phase, the network is exposed to temporal sequences of patterns undergoing the transformation. An application of the algorithm is presented in which the network learns invariance to shift in retinal position. Such a principle may be involved in the development of the characteristic shift invariance property of complex cells in the primary visual cortex, and also in the development of more complicated invariance properties of neurons in higher visual areas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This idea of continuity is used in a great number of artificial neural networks and related models (Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002; Földiák, 2008; Mobahi et al., 2009).”
From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Földiák, 2008
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Fukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Feature Discovery by Competitive Learning*
Rumelhart, D. E., & Zipser, D. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_5 · Cited by 1,398
Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex
Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00239352 · Cited by 1,385
Forming sparse representations by local anti-Hebbian learning
Földiák, P. (1990) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf02331346 · Cited by 541
Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex
Barlow, H. B., & Földiák, P. (1989) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 263
Learning translation invariant recognition in a massively parallel networks
Hinton, G. E. (1987) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-17943-7_117 · Cited by 179
A complex-cell receptive-field model
Spitzer, H., & Hochstein, S. (1985) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1985.53.5.1266 · Cited by 144
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Barlow H. B., 1989, Chap., 4, 54
- Sutton R. S., 1981, Psychol. RKV., 88, 135
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 660
An investigation into face pose distributions
Gong, S., McKenna, S. J., & Collins, J. J. (2002) · International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition · doi:10.1109/afgr.1996.557275 · Cited by 91
“There clearly exist, however, a variety of spatial and temporal contextual cues such as body pose and continuity of pose change which could be used [1, 10, 11, 22].”
BackgroundNewborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience
Wood, J. N. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308246110 · Cited by 91
Face image analysis by unsupervised learning and redundancy reduction
Bartlett, M. S., & MacLeod, D. I. A. (1998) · Cited by 89
Unsupervised learning of invariant representations
Anselmi, F., Leibo, J. Z., Rosasco, L., Mutch, J., Tacchetti, A., & Poggio, T. (2016) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2015.06.048 · Cited by 88
“Unsupervised learning is the main mechanism: for a “complex” cell to pool over several simple cells, the key is a modified Hebbian rule based on temporal association (Foldiak-type rule, [30]): cells that fire in temporal contiguity are wired together.”
BackgroundBubbles: a unifying framework for low-level statistical properties of natural image sequences
Hyvärinen, A., Hurri, J., & Väyrynen, J. J. (2003) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.20.001237 · Cited by 85
Viewpoint Invariant Face Recognition using Independent Component Analysis and Attractor Networks
Bartlett, M. S., & B, T. J. S. A. (1996) · Cited by 85
Object Recognition and Sensitive Periods: A Computational Analysis of Visual Imprinting
O’Reilly, R. C., & Johnson, M. H. (1994) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1994.6.3.357 · Cited by 85
Learning Intermediate-Level Representations of Form and Motion from Natural Movies
Cadieu, C. F., & Olshausen, B. A. (2011) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00247 · Cited by 87
“…by a number of image modeling researchers (Chen & Gopinath, 2000; Shan, Zhang, & Cottrell, 2007; Lyu & Simoncelli, 2The linear relationship between the time derivative of phase and motion is a different effect from the linearization of the joint distribution dependencies of phase derivatives.”
BackgroundResultPoggio, T., & Serre, T. (2006) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 85
Neuronal tuning and associative mechanisms in form representation.Preprint
Sakai, K. L., Naya, Y., & Miyashita, Y. (1994) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1.2.83 · Cited by 82
Learning Perceptually Salient Visual Parameters Using Spatiotemporal Smoothness Constraints
Stone, J. V. (1996) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1996.8.7.1463 · Cited by 81
Treves, A. (2004) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.10187 · Cited by 78
“The “trace” rule of mechanism A1, for example, has been proposed long ago as a mechanism to set up invariant representations (Foldiak, 1991), and, while its asymmetry was experimentally characterized more precisely as STDP, it was proposed to underlie the learning of temporal sequences (Minai and…”
BackgroundLearning invariant object recognition in the visual system with continuous transformations
Stringer, S. M., Perry, G., Rolls, E. T., & Proske, J. H. (2005) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-005-0030-z · Cited by 79
“Continuous transform (CT) learning is compared with another approach to invariance learning, trace learning, in this paper, and we summarise next the trace learning procedure developed and analysed previously (Földiák 1991; Rolls 1992; Rolls and Milward 2000; Rolls and Stringer 2001; Wallis and Rolls 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialModeling Deep Temporal Dependencies with Recurrent Grammar Cells
Michalski, V., Memisevic, R., & Konda, K. (2014) · Cited by 77
Learning mechanisms in the temporal lobe visual cortex
Rolls, E. T. (1995) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(94)00138-6 · Cited by 77
Faces in early visual environments are persistent not just frequent
Jayaraman, S., & Smith, L. B. (2018) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2018.05.005 · Cited by 76
“invariances by tracking stable and slow-changing information in time (Földiák, 2008; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002).”
Reinforcement Learning on Slow Features of High-Dimensional Input Streams
Legenstein, R. A., Wilbert, N., & Wiskott, L. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000894 · Cited by 74
“that important stimulus features such as object category, the position of objects, or their orientation can be easily extracted by supervised training with high precision from the slow features of a high-dimensional visual input stream. It should be noted that the SFA algorithm is only one particular implementation of…”
BackgroundInvariant visual object recognition: A model, with lighting invariance
Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2006) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.004 · Cited by 77
“By presenting consistent sequences of transforming objects the cells in the network can learn to respond to the same object through all of its naturally transformed states, as described by Földiák (1991) and Rolls (1992).”
BackgroundMethodSlowness: An Objective for Spike-Timing–Dependent Plasticity?
Sprekeler, H., Michaelis, C., & Wiskott, L. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030112 · Cited by 74
“This ‘‘ slowness ’’ or ‘‘ temporal stability ’’ principle is the basis of a whole class of learning algorithms [1–7].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSlow Feature Analysis: A Theoretical Analysis of Optimal Free Responses
Wiskott, L. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603322297331 · Cited by 74
“This approach to unsupervised learning of invariant representations has been taken by a number of researchers since the early 90s (Földiák, 1991; Mitchison, 1991; Becker & Hinton, 1992; O'Reilly & Johnson, 1994; Stone & Bray, 1995; Wallis & Rolls, 1997; Peng et al., 1998; Kayser et al., 2001;…”
BackgroundDynamic Scene Classification: Learning Motion Descriptors with Slow Features Analysis
Thériault, C., Thome, N., & Cord, M. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.336 · Cited by 74
“One unsupervised learning principle in neuroscience is to minimize temporal variations created by motion in order to learn stable representations of object undergoing motion [27, 14, 24].”
BackgroundWhat Is the Relation Between Slow Feature Analysis and Independent Component Analysis?
Blaschke, T., Berkes, P., & Wiskott, L. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2495 · Cited by 81
“With such weights, this measure of slowness is similar to the objective of temporal smoothness used by Stone (1995) and somewhat related to the trace learning rules introduced by F¨oldi´ak (1991).”
MethodAshbridge, E., Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W., & Jellema, T. (2000) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432900380463 · Cited by 71
Position invariant recognition in the visual system with cluttered environments
Stringer, S. M., & Rolls, E. T. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00017-4 · Cited by 70
Self‐generated variability in object images predicts vocabulary growth
Slone, L. K., Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2019) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12816 · Cited by 75
Stringer, S. M., Rolls, E. T., & Trappenberg, T. P. (2003) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(03)00210-7 · Cited by 71
“However, a simpler form of trace learning rule, involving only two firing rate terms, has been previously used as a biologically plausible learning rule for invariant object recognition (Földiák, 1991; Rolls & Deco, 2002; Wallis & Rolls, 1997).”
MethodKeysers, C., Xiao, D. K., Földiák, P., & Perrett, D. I. (2005) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290442000103 · Cited by 72
“The long persistence of the responses in STSa may also have another function (e.g., Foldiak, 1991 ).”
BackgroundKoller, S. M., Hardmeier, D., Michel, S., & Schwaninger, A. (2008) · Journal of Transportation Security · doi:10.1007/s12198-007-0006-4 · Cited by 70
“It has been assumed that different views of each object become associated with one another during object rotation, either through active learning or through passive experiencing of the successive appearance of nearby views ( Foldiak 1991; Stryker 1991).”
BackgroundOn the design of neural networks in the brain by genetic evolution
Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2000) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(99)00066-0 · Cited by 68
“Use of such a rule has been proposed to be one way in which networks can learn invariant responses (FoÈ ldia k, 1991; Rolls, 1992; Wallis and Rolls, 1997; Rolls and Treves, 1998; Rolls and Milward, 2000; Rolls and Stringer, 2000).”
BackgroundDeep Neural Networks in Computational NeurosciencePreprint
Kietzmann, T. C., McClure, P., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/133504 · Cited by 74
“This potentially simplifies readout from downstream neurons (Berkes & Wiskott, 2005; Földiák, 1991; C. Kayser, Körding, & König, 2003; Christoph Kayser, Einhäuser, Dümmer, König, & Körding, 2001; Körding, Kayser, Einhäuser, & König, 2004; Rolls, 2012; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002).”
Invariant Object Recognition and Pose Estimation with Slow Feature Analysis
Franzius, M., Wilbert, N., & Wiskott, L. (2011) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00171 · Cited by 70
Extracting Slow Subspaces from Natural Videos Leads to Complex Cells
Kayser, C., Einhäuser, W., Dümmer, O., Peter König, B., & Kording, K. P. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44668-0_149 · Cited by 65
Using Spatio-temporal Correlations to Learn Invariant Object Recognition
Wallis, G. M. (1996) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00041-x · Cited by 63
Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Representations in Hierarchical ArchitecturesPreprint
Anselmi, F., Leibo, J. Z., Rosasco, L., Mutch, J., Tacchetti, A., & Poggio, T. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1311.4158 · Cited by 63
“We conjectured that this could be done by unsupervised learning based on the temporal adjacency assumption [55, 56].”
BackgroundNatural Image Coding in V1: How Much Use Is Orientation Selectivity?
Eichhorn, J., Sinz, F. H., & Bethge, M. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000336 · Cited by 65
“Besides redundancy reduction, a variety of other interesting criteria such as sparseness [7,8], temporal coherence [9], predictive information [10,11] , or bottom-up saliency [12] have been formulated.”
BackgroundLearning Transformational Invariants from Natural Movies
Cadieu, C. F., & Olshausen, B. A. (2008) · Cited by 62
A Taxonomy for Spatiotemporal Connectionist Networks Revisited: The Unsupervised Case
Barreto, G. A., Araujo, A. F. R., & Kremer, S. C. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780281 · Cited by 62
“As pointed out by Hinton and Sejnowski (1999), the generative framework can also be used to characterize some unsupervised STCNs, such as those involved in extracting perceptual invariances from spatiotemporal sequences of images (Földiák, 1991; Stone & Bray, 1995; Stone, 1996; Wallis, 1996; Kohonen, 1996; Kohonen, Ka…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning invariant responses to the natural transformations of objects
Wallis, G. M., Rolls, E. T., & Földiák, P. (2005) · IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks/IEEE ... International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1993.716702 · Cited by 61
“2 Theory of Learning The idea that incorporating a trace of cell activity could aid the learning of natural transforms of objects was first discussed in detail by Foldi6k (FoldiAk 1991).”
BackgroundRemoving Time Variation with the Anti-Hebbian Differential Synapse
Mitchison, G. (1991) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1991.3.3.312 · Cited by 61
“Hinton and Becker (1990) investigated a rule whereby units with nonoverlapping receptive fields try to maximize their mutual information.”
BackgroundThe development of newborn object recognition in fast and slow visual worlds
Wood, J. N., & Wood, S. M. W. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0166 · Cited by 60
A smoothness constraint on the development of object recognition
Wood, J. N. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.013 · Cited by 59
“…have long theorized that biological visual systems leverage the temporal smoothness of natural visual environments to recognize objects (e.g., DiCarlo, Zoccolan, & Rust, 2012; Feldman & Tremoulet, 2006; Foldiak, 1991; Gibson, 1979; Stone, 1996; Wallis & Rolls, 1997; Wiskott & Sejnowski, 2002).”
A neuromorphic approach to computer vision
Serre, T., & Poggio, T. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1831407.1831425 · Cited by 57
“, for V1-like complex units, learning which afferent units with the same orientation and neighboring locations should be wired together because, often, such a pattern changes smoothly in time (under translation) [31].”
BackgroundOptimal, Unsupervised Learning in Invariant Object Recognition
Wallis, G. M., & Baddeley, R. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.4.883 · Cited by 59
Connectionism and Developmental Psychology
Plunkett, K., Karmiloff‐Smith, A., Bates, E. A., Elman, J. L., & Johnson, M. H. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01505.x · Cited by 58
Computation of pattern invariance in brain-like structures
Ullman, S., & Soloviev, S. (1999) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00048-9 · Cited by 57
“Biologically plausible models have been described for the creation of such units, that emerge by simple synaptic modification rules as a result of patterns drifting across the retina (Földiák, 1991; Parga & Rolls, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvariant Object Recognition with Slow Feature Analysis
Franzius, M., Wilbert, N., & Wiskott, L. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87536-9_98 · Cited by 56
“The slowness principle has been applied in many models of the visual system in the past [11, 12, 13, 5, 6, 2].”
MethodLimited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition
Dill, M., & Fahle, M. W. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211918 · Cited by 58
Implicit Learning in 3D Object Recognition: The Importance of Temporal Context
Becker, S. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016683 · Cited by 55
Transform-Invariant Recognition by Association in a Recurrent Network
Parga, N., & Rolls, E. T. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017287 · Cited by 55
“Foldiak (1991) showed that translation-invariance learning over a one-dimensional input array was possible for a simple winner-take-all network with a decaying trace of previous neuronal activity and an associative Hebb rule. Rolls (1992, 1994, 1995) and (Rolls & Treves, 1997) suggest that invariant representations co…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2001) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1080/net.12.2.111.129 · Cited by 52
Learning the Lie Groups of Visual Invariance
Xu, M., & Rao, R. P. N. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.10.2665 · Cited by 53
“where kron denotes the Kronecker product (or tensor product) ( Eves, 1980 ) (see the appendix for definition),Ci = (Ii − I0i )IT 0i and Di = I0iI T 0i . Reshaping”
BackgroundMethodPredictive Coding and the Slowness Principle: An Information-Theoretic Approach
Creutzig, F., & Sprekeler, H. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.01-07-455 · Cited by 54
“(Földiak, 1991; Wallis & Rolls, 1997; O’Reilly & Johnson, 1994; Stone & Bray, 1995; Einhäuser, Hipp, Eggert, Körner, & König, 2005).”
The Role of Visual Area V4 in the Discrimination of Partially Occluded Shapes
Kosai, Y., El-Shamayleh, Y., Fyall, A. M., & Pasupathy, A. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1375-14.2014 · Cited by 55
Wallis, G. M., Backus, B. T., Langer, M., Huebner, G. M., & Bülthoff, H. (2009) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/9.7.6 · Cited by 52
Rolls, E. T. (2019) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23171 · Cited by 54
Naturalistic approaches to sensorimotor control
Ingram, J. N., & Wolpert, D. M. (2011) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53752-2.00016-3 · Cited by 53
Curriculum learning for human compositional generalization
Dekker, R., Otto, F., & Summerfield, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2205582119 · Cited by 63
“On a computational level, the idea that the brain uses temporal correlations to extract invariant information during sensory representation learning is the basis for slow feature analysis (33) and related approaches based on temporal stabilization (34, 35).”
BackgroundLeibo, J. Z., Liao, Q., Anselmi, F., Freiwald, W. A., & Poggio, T. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.015 · Cited by 48
Learning viewpoint invariant object representations using a temporal coherence principle
Einhäuser, W., Hipp, J. F., Eggert, J. P., Körner, E., & Peter König, B. (2005) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-005-0585-8 · Cited by 47
Tsanov, M., & Manahan-Vaughan, D. (2008) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858408315655 · Cited by 65
“It is assumed that this process, which takes place gradually from V1 to TE, obeys the Hebbian learning rule, and includes a short memory trace of preceding neuronal activity (Foldiak 1991; Rolls 1992; Wallis and Rolls 1997).”
BackgroundBilinear models of natural images
Olshausen, B. A., Cadieu, C. F., Culpepper, J., & Warland, D. K. (2007) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.715515 · Cited by 50
Oram, M. W., Perrett, D. I., & Hietanen, J. K. (1993) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00228696 · Cited by 50
“"decorrelation" of Foldiak 1991 ) will automatically extract orthogonal dimensions (or principal components amongst sensory inputs).”
BackgroundDevelopment of Maps of Simple and Complex Cells in the Primary Visual Cortex
Antolík, J., & Bednar, J. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2011.00017 · Cited by 49
“Thanks also to all of the Topographica developers, without whom this work would not have been possible. and Sejnowski, 2002) or the trace rule (Földiák, 1991).”
BackgroundDeep Predictive Learning in Neocortex and Pulvinar
O’Reilly, R. C., Russin, J., Zolfaghar, M., & Rohrlich, J. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01708 · Cited by 49
Anti-Hebbian learning in topologically constrained linear networks: a tutorial
Palmieri, F., Zhu, J., & Chang, C. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.248453 · Cited by 49
Learning viewpoint-invariant face representations from visual experience in an attractor network
Bartlett, M. S., & B, T. J. S. A. (1998) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/9/3/008 · Cited by 49
Learning Features of Intermediate Complexity for the Recognition of Biological Motion
Sigala, R., Serre, T., Poggio, T., & Giese, M. A. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11550822_39 · Cited by 45
“The algorithm is inspired by previous work [3] that exploits a simple trace rule for the learning of shift invariance.”
Kompella, V. R., Luciw, M., & Schmidhuber, J. (2012) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00344 · Cited by 56
“A temporal stability objective has been used in some other unsupervised learning techniques (Hinton, 1989; Földiák, 1991; Mitchison, 1991; Schmidhuber, 1992a; Bergstra and Bengio, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA contour propagation approach to surface filling-in and volume formation.
Tse, P. U. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.1.91 · Cited by 48
Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features
Ullman, S., & Bart, E. (2004) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2004.01.006 · Cited by 49
“A biologically plausible model for tracking and associating corresponding image regions was proposed by Foldiak (1991) and used in the VisNet model (Stringer & Rolls, 2002).”
MethodComputational Models of Object Recognition in Cortex: A Review
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2000) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada458109 · Cited by 51
Deep learning of invariant spatio-temporal features from video
Chen, B. (2010) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0051916 · Cited by 48
“One conjecture is that temporal coherence [3, 13, 53] is the key 1This only gives a coarse approximation to the true neuronal connectivity and the actual information processing pathway.”
BackgroundPrior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles
Wang, G., Obama, S., Yamashita, W., Sugihara, T., & Tanaka, K. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1600 · Cited by 47
“It has been assumed that different views of each object become associated with one another during object rotation, either through active learning or through passive experiencing of the successive appearance of nearby view”
BackgroundA learning rule for extracting spatio-temporal invariances
Stone, J. V., & Bray, A. J. (1995) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/6/3/008 · Cited by 47
Preintegration Lateral Inhibition Enhances Unsupervised Learning
Spratling, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602320264033 · Cited by 47
“…Swindale, 1996; von der Malsburg, 1973; Oja, 1989; Sanger, 1989; O’Reilly, 1998) or implicitly through a selection process which chooses the ‘win-ning’ node(s) (Rumelhart and Zipser, 1985; Kohonen, 1997; Grossberg, 1987; Ritter et al., 1992; Hertz et al., 1991; F ¨ oldi ´ ak, 1991; Wallis, 1996).”
Li, N., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3786-11.2012 · Cited by 51
“The ventral stream could take advantage of this natural tendency and learn to associate neuronal representations that occur closely in time to yield tolerant object selectivity (i.e., optimizing the “slowness” of visual representation) (Foldiak, 1991; Stryker, 1991; Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002).”
The role of visual field position in pattern–discrimination learning
Dill, M., & Fahle, M. W. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0142 · Cited by 47
“For simple visual features, like oriented lines, invariant detectors may even be built into the brain, much in the same way as complex cells pool information from several position-specific simple cells in early visual processing stages (Hubel & Wiesel 1962; Földiák 1991).”
BackgroundSpatial view cells in the hippocampus, and their idiothetic update based on place and head direction
Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2005) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2005.08.006 · Cited by 46
“Such rules are able to build associations between different patterns of neural activities that tend to occur in temporal proximity (Földiák, 1991; Rolls & Stringer, 2001; Wallis and Rolls, 1997).”
Primary visual cortex straightens natural video trajectories
Hénaff, O. J., Bai, Y., Charlton, J. A., Nauhaus, I., Simoncelli, E. P., & Goris, R. L. T. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25939-z · Cited by 42
“We then recorded responses to (1) sinusoidal gratings, (2) modified sparse-noise stimuli, and (3) static frames from natural and unnatural movie clips.”
MethodConsciousness in Neural Networks?
Rolls, E. T. (1997) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(97)00049-x · Cited by 44
“Foldiak (1991) has proposed computing an average activation of the postsynaptic neuron to assist with the same problem .”
BackgroundMethodObject knowledge in infancy: current controversies and approaches
Denis Mareschal, B. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01536-9 · Cited by 44
Spatial vs temporal continuity in view invariant visual object recognition learning
Perry, G., Rolls, E. T., & Stringer, S. M. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.025 · Cited by 44
“One proposed method for the learning of invariance in the visual system is to utilize the temporal continuity of objects in the visual environment (over short time periods) to help the learning of invariant representations (Földiák, 1991; Rolls, 1992; Wallis & Rolls, 1997; Rolls & Milward, 2000; Rolls & Stringer, 2001…”
Learning to Categorize Objects Using Temporal Coherence
Becker, S. (1993) · Cited by 43
CoTracker3: Simpler and Better Point Tracking by Pseudo-Labeling Real Videos
Karaev, N., Makarov, Y., Wang, J.-Y., Neverova, N., Vedaldi, A., & Rupprecht, C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00568 · Cited by 310
“Accounting for cycle consistency [13, 30, 41] or temporal continuity [9, 43] in videos is another way to obtain a reliable proxy signal to learn correspondences without full supervision, or even to learn generic visual features [10, 40].”
Temporal stability of stimulus representation increases along rodent visual cortical hierarchies
Piasini, E., Soltuzu, L., Muratore, P., Caramellino, R., Vinken, K., de Beeck, H. O., Balasubramanian, V., & Zoccolan, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24456-3 · Cited by 44
Perrett, D. I., & Oram, M. W. (1998) · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C · doi:10.1515/znc-1998-7-807 · Cited by 43
How Does Our Visual System Achieve Shift and Size Invariance?
Wiskott, L. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195148220.003.0016 · Cited by 41
“However, for clarity the left type of illustration will be used in the following. objective of extracting slowly changing features from the quickly varying sensory input (F¨oldi´ak, 1991), which then leads to a robust and invariant representation of the environment.”
MethodMarshall, J. A. (1995) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)00099-8 · Cited by 41
A fast, invariant representation for human action in the visual system
Işık, L., Tacchetti, A., & Poggio, T. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00642.2017 · Cited by 42
A Structured Model of Video Reproduces Primary Visual Cortical Organisation
Berkes, P., Turner, R. E., & Sahani, M. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000495 · Cited by 42
“Under the temporal stability objective, neuronal RFs are adapted so that their output firing rates vary slowly in time [24–26].”
BackgroundLocal plasticity rules can learn deep representations using self-supervised contrastive predictionsPreprint
Illing, B., Ventura, J., Bellec, G., & Wulfram Gerstner, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.08262 · Cited by 42
“…emerging from local plasticity rules implementing principal/independent component analysis [Oja, 1982, Hyvärinen and Oja, 1998], sparse coding [Olshausen and Field, 1997, Rozell et al., 2008] or slow-feature analysis [Földiák, 1991, Wiskott and Sejnowski, 2002, Sprekeler et al., 2007].”
MethodBootsTAP: Bootstrapped Training for Tracking-Any-Point
Doersch, C., Luc, P., Yan, S., Gokay, D., Koppula, S., Gupta, A., Heyward, J., Rocco, I., Goroshin, R., Carreira, J., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0901-7_28 · Cited by 39
Masquelier, T. (2011) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-011-0361-9 · Cited by 41
“The first one are the so called “trace rule” models (Földiák 1991; Wallis and Rolls 1997; Rolls and Milward 2000; Stringer and Rolls 2000; Einhäuser et al. 2002; Spratling 2005; Masquelier et al. 2007), able to learn invariance (for e.g. to position and scale) from a series of frames in which…”
BackgroundRolls, E. T., & Deco, G. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.021 · Cited by 40
Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system
Wallis, G. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497 · Cited by 40
“A plausible and robust solution appears to be that the visual system associates views on the basis of their temporal proximity as well as spatial similarity (Pitts and McCulloch, 1947; Földiák, 1991; Miyashita, 1993; Wallis and Bülthoff, 1999; Wallis et al., 2009).”
BackgroundGroup-based Learning of Disentangled Representations with Generalizability for Novel Contents
Hosoya, H. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/348 · Cited by 39
“They crucially assumed that the content variable remains similar in consecutive frames, as inspired by the temporal coherence principle [Földiák, 1991].”
BackgroundLearning and disrupting invariance in visual recognition with a temporal association rule
Isik, L., Leibo, J. Z., & Poggio, T. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00037 · Cited by 38
Brain mechanisms of vision, memory, and consciousness.
Rolls, E. T. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10247-006 · Cited by 38
Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Coding
Klindt, D. A., Schott, L., Sharma, Y., Ustyuzhaninov, I., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Paiton, D. M. (2020) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10930 · Cited by 88
“With the SlowVAE model we provide a parsimonious solution to identifiable nonlinear ICA that is inspired by a long history of learning visual representations from temporal data [39, 40].”
MethodSoft Mixer Assignment in a Hierarchical Generative Model of Natural Scene Statistics
Schwartz, O., B, T. J. S. A., & Dayan, P. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.11.2680 · Cited by 41
“First, various interesting bottom-up approaches to hierarchical representation are based on the idea that higher-level structure changes more slowly than low-level structure (Földiak, 1991; Wallis & Baddeley, 1997; Becker, 1999; Laurenz & Sejnowski, 2002; Einhäuser, Kayser, König, & Körding, 2002; Körding, Kayser, Ein…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Földiák, P.
- Affiliations
- Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, U.K.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 194-200
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2096388912
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- invariance learning, transformation sequences, translation invariance, local learning rules, visual object recognition, complex cells, primary visual cortex, visual system development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review