The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities
Abstract
Many neural network classifiers provide outputs which estimate Bayesian a posteriori probabilities. When the estimation is accurate, network outputs can be treated as probabilities and sum to one. Simple proofs show that Bayesian probabilities are estimated when desired network outputs are 1 of M (one output unity, all others zero) and a squared-error or cross-entropy cost function is used. Results of Monte Carlo simulations performed using multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks trained with backpropagation, radial basis function (RBF) networks, and high-order polynomial networks graphically demonstrate that network outputs provide good estimates of Bayesian probabilities. Estimation accuracy depends on network complexity, the amount of training data, and the degree to which training data reflect true likelihood distributions and a priori class probabilities. Interpretation of network outputs as Bayesian probabilities allows outputs from multiple networks to be combined for higher level decision making, simplifies creation of rejection thresholds, makes it possible to compensate for differences between pattern class probabilities in training and test data, allows outputs to be used to minimize alternative risk functions, and suggests alternative measures of network performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bidirectional recurrent neural networks
Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.650093 · Cited by 10,172
A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks
Buda, M., Maki, A., & Mazurowski, M. A. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011 · Cited by 3,088
“However, the most basic version simply compensates for prior class probabilities [43].”
BackgroundSolving Multiclass Learning Problems via Error-Correcting Output Codes
Dietterich, T. G., & Bakiri, G. (1995) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.105 · Cited by 2,739
Tu, J. V. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00002-9 · Cited by 1,818
Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labels
Northcutt, C., Jiang, L., & Chuang, I. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12125 · Cited by 795
Metadata
- Authors
- Richard, M. D., & Lippmann, R. P.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 461-483
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W1980501707
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/neco.1991.3.4.461
- The paper
- Richard, M. D., & Lippmann, R. P. (1991). Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1991.3.4.461
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.