Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 676

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flat Minima

Hochreiter, Sepp, Schmidhuber, Jürgen·1997·Neural Computation

Abstract

We present a new algorithm for finding low-complexity neural networks with high generalization capability. The algorithm searches for a “flat” minimum of the error function. A flat minimum is a large connected region in weight space where the error remains approximately constant. An MDL-based, Bayesian argument suggests that flat minima correspond to “simple” networks and low expected overfitting. The argument is based on a Gibbs algorithm variant and a novel way of splitting generalization error into underfitting and overfitting error. Unlike many previous approaches, ours does not require gaussian assumptions and does not depend on a “good” weight prior. Instead we have a prior over input output functions, thus taking into account net architecture and training set. Although our algorithm requires the computation of second-order derivatives, it has backpropagation's order of complexity. Automatically, it effectively prunes units, weights, and input lines. Various experiments with feedforward and recurrent nets are described. In an application to stock market prediction, flat minimum search outperforms conventional backprop, weight decay, and “optimal brain surgeon/optimal brain damage.”

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Buntine W. L., 1991, Complex Systems, 5, 603
  2. Carter M. J., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2, 340
  3. Fahlman S. E., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, D. S. Touretzky, ed., 525
  4. 10.2307/1268518 · DOI
  5. Hanson S. J., 1989, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, D. S. Touretzky, ed., 177
  6. LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2, D. S. Touretzky, ed., 598
  7. Levin A. U., 1994, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, J. D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, and J. Alspector, eds., 35
  8. Moody J. E., 1989, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, D. S. Touretzky, ed., 29
  9. Mozer M. C., 1989, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, D. S. Touretzky, ed., 107
  10. Wang C., 1994, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, J. D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, and J. Alspector, eds., 303
  11. Wolpert D. H., 1994, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6, J. D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, and J. Alspector, eds., 200

Cited by

See all 676

Metadata

Authors
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J.
Venue
Neural Computation
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-42
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2912811302
Cited by
676
References
42
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flat Minima. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1
The paper
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Flat Minima. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.