Cited by 1,180Psychedelics and Drug StudiesParanormal Experiences and BeliefsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

REBUS and the anarchic brain: Toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics

Open access
Carhart-Harris, R.L., Friston, K.J.·2019·Pharmacological Reviews

Abstract

This paper formulates the action of psychedelics by integrating the free-energy principle and entropic brain hypothesis. We call this formulation relaxed beliefs under psychedelics (REBUS) and the anarchic brain, founded on the principle that—via their entropic effect on spontaneous cortical activity—psychedelics work to relax the precision of high-level priors or beliefs, thereby liberating bottom-up information flow, particularly via intrinsic sources such as the limbic system. We assemble evidence for this model and show how it can explain a broad range of phenomena associated with the psychedelic experience. With regard to their potential therapeutic use, we propose that psychedelics work to relax the precision weighting of pathologically overweighted priors underpinning various expressions of mental illness. We propose that this process entails an increased sensitization of high-level priors to bottom-up signaling (stemming from intrinsic sources), and that this heightened sensitivity enables the potential revision and deweighting of overweighted priors. We end by discussing further implications of the model, such as that psychedelics can bring about the revision of other heavily weighted high-level priors, not directly related to mental health, such as those underlying partisan and/or overly-confident political, religious, and/or philosophical perspectives. Significance Statement Psychedelics are capturing interest, with efforts underway to bring psilocybin therapy to marketing authorisation and legal access within a decade, spearheaded by the findings of a series of phase 2 trials. In this climate, a compelling unified model of how psychedelics alter brain function to alter consciousness would have appeal. Towards this end, we have sought to integrate a leading model of global brain function, hierarchical predictive coding, with an often-cited model of the acute action of psychedelics, the entropic brain hypothesis. The resulting synthesis states that psychedelics work to relax high-level priors, sensitising them to liberated bottom-up information flow, which, with the right intention, care provision and context, can help guide and cultivate the revision of entrenched pathological priors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/pr.118.017160

Cites

277 of 277 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute psychedelic treatment is thought to cause inhibition of top-down regulation of the brain by higher-order cortical regions, such as PFC and PPC, resulting in prediction errors and enormous increases in updates in prior beliefs.

    “Another model of psychedelic actions on brain-wide circuits is the”

    From Psychedelics and Neural Plasticity: Therapeutic Implications (2022) · cites this paper as Carhart-Harris and Friston, 2019

    The Introduction and REBUS Model propose that psychedelics relax high-level priors, weakening top-down suppression so ascending prediction errors can influence and revise beliefs. The passages support that mechanism, but do not identify PFC and PPC as the regions responsible or establish an enormous increase in belief updates. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Carhart-Harris and Friston distinguish between complete ego-dissolution-a state of complete surrender, associated bliss, and union with all things-and incomplete ego-dissolution-a state characterized by intense fear, anxiety and distress.

    “Carhart-Harris and Friston (2020) distinguish between ‘complete ego-dissolution’—a state of ‘complete surrender, associated bliss, and union with all things’ (Carhart-Harris and Friston 2019, 321); and ‘incomplete’ ego-dissolution—a state characterized by intense fear, anxiety and distress.”

    From Consciousness in active inference: Deep self-models, other minds, and the challenge of psychedelic-induced ego-dissolution (2021) · cites this paper as Carhart-Harris and Friston 2019

    In II.H, the paper says that ego dissolution, when surrendered to, includes a unitive experience—a sense of union and interconnectedness. The Introduction also describes anxiety and uncertainty as possible psychedelic experiences. Our copy does not distinguish these as ‘complete’ and ‘incomplete’ ego-dissolution, characterize the latter by intense fear and distress, or contain the quoted wording about bliss. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The REBUS model suggests psychedelics "relax" high-level cortical cognitive structures, or "priors," reducing the precision of these priors and allowing bottom-up subcortical sensory information, along with dissociated memories, emotions, and thoughts, to surface.

    “It suggests that psychedelics “relax” high-level cortical cognitive structures, or “priors” - deep-seated beliefs and assumptions that shape how individuals perceive and interpret the world.”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [101]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The altered state of consciousness induced by psychedelics is characterized by high sensitivity to the immediate and previous context, which can help actualize the person's belief system with bottom-up information.

    “The altered state of consciousness induced by psychedelics is characterized by high sensitivity to the immediate and previous context, which can help actualize of the person’s belief system with bottom-up information (56).”

    From Ayahuasca-assisted meaning reconstruction therapy for grief: a non-randomized clinical trial protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction and section II.C describe heightened sensitivity to context under psychedelics, and section II.F proposes that bottom-up information can prompt revision of high-level beliefs. These passages support the central paraphrase, but they do not specifically distinguish sensitivity to immediate context from sensitivity to previous context. The belief-revision mechanism is also presented as a proposal, not an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ayahuasca experience could bring new information to the foreground to enrich the therapeutic process, providing an opportunity to transform maladaptive narratives about oneself, other people, or the world.

    “The ayahuasca experience, therefore, could bring new information to the foreground to enrich the therapeutic process, providing an opportunity to transform maladaptive narratives about oneself, other people (including the deceased) or the world (56, 57).”

    From Ayahuasca-assisted meaning reconstruction therapy for grief: a non-randomized clinical trial protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Introduction says psychedelics can allow previously suppressed information into conscious experience, and the REBUS Model’s Summary proposes that, with good contextual support, this may help revise pathologic beliefs in therapy. That supports the proposed mechanism, but the paper describes psychedelics generally rather than establishing this process specifically for ayahuasca or for narratives involving deceased people. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 283 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alexander BK (2008) The Globalisation of Addiction: A Study in Poverty of the Spirit, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  2. Freud S (1949) An Outline of Psycho-Analysis, Hogarth Press, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Carhart-Harris, R.L.
Venue
Pharmacological Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
316-344
ISSN
0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949457836
Cited by
1,180
References
283
Citations by year
2026: 262 · 2025: 245 · 2024: 210 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
psychedelics, rebus, free energy principle, hierarchical predictive coding, prior distributions, belief updating, spontaneous cortical activity, limbic system, mental illness, consciousness
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Culture, Hallucinogens, Humans, Models, Neurological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review