Cited by 331Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Stochastic completion fields: A neural model of illusory contour shape and salience.

Williams, Lance R., Jacobs, David W.·1997·Neural Computation

Abstract

We describe an algorithm- and representation-level theory of illusory contour shape and salience. Unlike previous theories, our model is derived from a single assumption: that the prior probability distribution of boundary completion shape can be modeled by a random walk in a lattice whose points are positions and orientations in the image plane (i.e., the space that one can reasonably assume is represented by neurons of the mammalian visual cortex). Our model does not employ numerical relaxation or other explicit minimization, but instead relies on the fact that the probability that a particle following a random walk will pass through a given position and orientation on a path joining two boundary fragments can be computed directly as the product of two vector-field convolutions. We show that for the random walk we define, the maximum likelihood paths are curves of least energy, that is, on average, random walks follow paths commonly assumed to model the shape of illusory contours. A computer model is demonstrated on numerous illusory contour stimuli from the literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1997.9.4.837

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lee and Mumford suggested that the formation of illusory contours is primarily a top-down mechanism, in combination with lateral mechanisms.

    “Lee and Mumford [1] suggested that the formation of illusory contours is primarily a top-down mechanism, as also suggested in our experiments, in combination with lateral mechanisms proposed in [66].”

    From Towards a mathematical theory of cortical micro-circuits (2009) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, L. R., & Jacobs, D. W.
Affiliations
NEC Research Institute, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
837-858
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W1992336406
Cited by
331
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
illusory contours, contour completion, random walks, lattice model, visual cortex, boundary completion, shape priors
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Form Perception, Models, Neurological, Random Allocation, Stochastic Processes, Visual Fields, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review