The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Balanced Random Networks
Abstract
The balanced random network model attracts considerable interest because it explains the irregular spiking activity at low rates and large membrane potential fluctuations exhibited by cortical neurons in vivo. In this article, we investigate to what extent this model is also compatible with the experimentally observed phenomenon of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Confronted with the plethora of theoretical models for STDP available, we reexamine the experimental data. On this basis, we propose a novel STDP update rule, with a multiplicative dependence on the synaptic weight for depression, and a power law dependence for potentiation. We show that this rule, when implemented in large, balanced networks of realistic connectivity and sparseness, is compatible with the asynchronous irregular activity regime. The resultant equilibrium weight distribution is unimodal with fluctuating individual weight trajectories and does not exhibit development of structure. We investigate the robustness of our results with respect to the relative strength of depression. We introduce synchronous stimulation to a group of neurons and demonstrate that the decoupling of this group from the rest of the network is so severe that it cannot effectively control the spiking of other neurons, even those with the highest convergence from this group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., & Munro, P. (1982) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.02-01-00032.1982 · Cited by 2,896
Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons
Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Nelson, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36103 · Cited by 2,226
Cited by
Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning
Buzsáki, G. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22488 · Cited by 1,759
Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing
Morrison, A., Diesmann, M., & Gerstner, W. (2008) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-008-0233-1 · Cited by 593
Self-citationThe temporal paradox of Hebbian learning and homeostatic plasticity
Zenke, F., Gerstner, W., & Ganguli, S. (2017) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.03.015 · Cited by 201
Theoretical Neuroscience Rising
Abbott, L. F. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.019 · Cited by 163
(2009) · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, A., Aertsen, A., & Diesmann, M.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1437-1467
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2038511109
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Balanced Random Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/neco.2007.19.6.1437
- The paper
- Morrison, A., Aertsen, A., & Diesmann, M. (2007). Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Balanced Random Networks. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2007.19.6.1437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.