The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multistability and Perceptual Inference
Open accessAbstract
Ambiguous images present a challenge to the visual system: How can uncertainty about the causes of visual inputs be represented when there are multiple equally plausible causes? A Bayesian ideal observer should represent uncertainty in the form of a posterior probability distribution over causes. However, in many real-world situations, computing this distribution is intractable and requires some form of approximation. We argue that the visual system approximates the posterior over underlying causes with a set of samples and that this approximation strategy produces perceptual multistability--stochastic alternation between percepts in consciousness. Under our analysis, multistability arises from a dynamic sample-generating process that explores the posterior through stochastic diffusion, implementing a rational form of approximate Bayesian inference known as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We examine in detail the most extensively studied form of multistability, binocular rivalry, showing how a variety of experimental phenomena--gamma-like stochastic switching, patchy percepts, fusion, and traveling waves--can be understood in terms of MCMC sampling over simple graphical models of the underlying perceptual tasks. We conjecture that the stochastic nature of spiking neurons may lend itself to implementing sample-based posterior approximations in the brain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and Bayesian samplers produce human-like autocorrelations in perceptual and reasoning tasks [18,25].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Explicit models of autocorrelated sampling have been used to account for perceptual switching times of multistable stimuli [18] and anchoring effects in reasoning tasks [25].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“In the Bayesian framework, the perceptual uncertainty that characterizes the “misleading” stimuli arises from weak or conflicting sensory evidence (Sundareswara and Schrater, 2008; Gershman et al., 2012), with 2 principal mechanisms.”
From What visual illusions teach us about schizophrenia (2014) · cites this paper as Gershman et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.52202/085713 · Cited by 16,043
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.001.0001 · Cited by 9,187
(2009) · Cited by 6,153
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Robert, C., & Casella, G. (2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2 · Cited by 5,871
Monte Carlo Statistical Methods
Kim, H., Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270959 · Cited by 5,596
Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1703954 · Cited by 3,649
A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines
Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1985) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0901_7 · Cited by 3,402
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20
Bonilla, E. V., Chai, K. M. A., & Williams, C. K. I. (2008) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2,701
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Levy R., 2009, Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 937
- Shi L., 2009, Advances in neural information processing systems, 22, 1669
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building machines that learn and think like people
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x16001837 · Cited by 2,550
Self-citationComputational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines
Gershman, S. J., Horvitz, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac6076 · Cited by 722
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667
Vul (2014) · doi:10.1111/cogs.12101 · Cited by 502
Bayesian Brains without Probabilities
Sanborn, A. N., & Chater, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.003 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Gershman, S. J., Vul, E., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W1972769376
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- handle.uba.uva.nl
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1216045)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- perceptual multistability, binocular rivalry, approximate Bayesian inference, Markov chain Monte Carlo, stochastic sampling, posterior distribution, perceptual uncertainty, traveling waves, fusion, spiking neurons, probabilistic graphical models, visual perception
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Neurological, Monte Carlo Method, Nerve Net, Neurons, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Visual Perception, Neural Networks, Computer, Uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
