The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development*
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the impact on agricultural development of the introduction of barbed wire fencing to the American Plains in the late nineteenth century. Without a fence, farmers risked uncompensated damage by others' livestock. From 1880 to 1900, the introduction and near-universal adoption of barbed wire greatly reduced the cost of fences, relative to the predominant wooden fences, especially in counties with the least woodland. Over that period, counties with the least woodland experienced substantial relative increases in settlement, land improvement, land values, and the productivity and production share of crops most in need of protection. This increase in agricultural development appears partly to reflect farmers' increased ability to protect their land from encroachment. States' inability to protect this full bundle of property rights on the frontier, beyond providing formal land titles, might have otherwise restricted agricultural development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/432166 · Cited by 2,385
Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024539 · Cited by 980
Entitled to work: urban property rights and labor supply in Peru
Field, E. (2007) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2007.122.4.1561 · Cited by 637
Cited by
Railroads and American Economic Growth: A “Market Access” Approach *
Donaldson, D., & Hornbeck, R. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjw002 · Cited by 1,238
Self-citationHornbeck, R. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.4.1477 · Cited by 571
Self-citationThe triple difference estimator
Olden, A., & Møen, J. (2022) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utac010 · Cited by 432
The Economics of Slums in the Developing World
Marx, B., Stoker, T., & Suri, T. (2013) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.27.4.187 · Cited by 423
When the levee breaks: black migration and economic development in the American South
Hornbeck, R., & Naidu, S. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.3.963 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornbeck, R.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 767-810
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2160579106
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.767
- The paper
- Hornbeck, R. (2010). Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development*. Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.767
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.