Cited by 879Global trade and economicsInternational Business and FDIEconomic and Technological Innovation

Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity… for Some Plants *

Lileeva, Alla, Trefler, Daniel·2010·Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Market size matters for innovation and hence for productivity. Improved access to foreign markets will thus encourage firms to simultaneously export and invest in raising productivity. We examine this insight using the responses of Canadian plants to the elimination of U.S. tariffs. Unique “plant-specific” tariff cuts serve as an instrument for changes in exporting. We find that Canadian plants that were induced by the tariff cuts to start exporting or to export more (a) increased their labor productivity, (b) engaged in more product innovation, and (c) had higher adoption rates for advanced manufacturing technologies. Further, these responses were heterogeneous.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1051

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lileeva and Trefler (2010) found US tariff reductions raised productivity only in the least productive new Canadian exporters, contrasting with Argentina where Brazil's tariff cuts induced technology upgrading mostly in the third quartile and among old as well as new exporters.

    “Their finding that the reduction in US tariffs induced productivity increases in only the least productive new entrants in the export market for the case of Canada contrasts with the findings for Argentina where the reduction in Brazil's tariffs induced technology upgrading mostly in the third quartile of the firm-size distribution and not only in new but also in old exporters.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D.
Affiliations
  • Statistics Canada (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2010-08
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
1051-1099
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2166164058
Cited by
879
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 41
FWCI
87.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
foreign market access, tariff reduction, plant-level productivity, labor productivity, product innovation, exporting, manufacturing technology adoption, Canadian firms, US tariffs, market size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review