Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty

Chen, S., Ravallion, M.·2010·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

A new data set on national poverty lines is combined with new price data and almost 700 household surveys to estimate absolute poverty measures for the developing world. We find that 25% of the population lived in poverty in 2005, as judged by what “poverty” typically means in the world's poorest countries. This is higher than past estimates. Substantial overall progress is still indicated—the corresponding poverty rate was 52% in 1981—but progress was very uneven across regions. The trends over time and regional profile are robust to various changes in methodology, though precise counts are more sensitive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1577

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S., & Ravallion, M.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2010-11-01
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
1577-1625
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W1985869080
Cited by
1,062
References
0
FWCI
391.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1577
The paper
Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2010). The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1577

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.