Cited by 1,283scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Web of Science as a Data Source for Research on Scientific and Scholarly Activity

Open access
Birkle, Caroline, Pendlebury, David A., Schnell, Joshua, Adams, Jonathan·2020·Quantitative Science Studies

Abstract

Web of Science (WoS) is the world’s oldest, most widely used and authoritative database of research publications and citations. Based on the Science Citation Index, founded by Eugene Garfield in 1964, it has expanded its selective, balanced, and complete coverage of the world’s leading research to cover around 34,000 journals today. A wide range of use cases are supported by WoS from daily search and discovery by researchers worldwide through to the supply of analytical data sets and the provision of specialized access to raw data for bibliometric partners. A long- and well-established network of such partners enables the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) to continue to work closely with bibliometric groups around the world to the benefit of both the community and the services that the company provides to researchers and analysts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/qss_a_00018

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. In E. Noyons, P. Ngulube, & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2011: The 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Leuven: International Society of Scientometrics & Informetrics, pp. 13-18.
  2. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1985). Scientometric in- dicators: A 32-country comparative evaluation of publishing performance and citation impact. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
  3. Cawkell, T., & Garfield. E. (2001). Institute for Scientific Information. In E. H. Fredriksson (Ed.), A century of science publishing (pp. 151-160). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  4. Cole, J. R. (2000). A short history of the use of citations as a measure of the impact of scientific and scholarly work. In B. Cronin and H. Barsky Atkins (Eds.), The Web of Knowledge (pp. 281-300).
  5. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition. American Sociological Review, 32, 377-390.
  6. Garfield, E. (1971). The mystery of transposed journal lists- wherein Bradford's Law of Scattering is generalized according to Garfield's Law of Concentration. Current Contents, No. 17, 5-6, reprinted in Garfield, E., Essays of an Information Scientist, 1962-1973, I (pp. 222-223). Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J.
Affiliations
Institute for Scientific Information, Web of Science Group, 160 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8EZ, UK
Corresponding author
Adams, Jonathan
Venue
Quantitative Science Studies
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2020-02
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
363-376
ISSN
2641-3337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000895385
Cited by
1,283
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 275 · 2025: 338 · 2024: 288 · 2023: 179 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 16
FWCI
58.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Quantitative Science Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
Web of Science, bibliometric data sources, Science Citation Index, citation data, Institute for Scientific Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review