Cited by 355Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityLabour Market and MigrationGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Matching as a Tool to Decompose Wage Gaps

Ñopo, Hugo·2008·Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology that uses matching comparisons to explain gender wage differences. The approach emphasizes gender differences in the supports of the distributions of observable characteristics and provides insights into the distribution of unexplained gender pay differences. This nonparametric alternative to the Blinder-Oaxaca (BO) decomposition does not require the estimation of earnings equations and divides the gap into four additive elements. Two of these are analogous to the elements of the BO decomposition (but computed only over the common support of the distributions of characteristics), while the other two account for differences in the supports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest.90.2.290

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Ñopo model allows generating a synthetic counterfactual of individuals by matching men and women with identical observable characteristics, without needing to assume any functional form in the relationship between explanatory variables and income.

    “Esto permite generar un contrafactual sintético de individuos al parear hombres y mujeres con características observables idénticas, sin necesidad de suponer ninguna forma funcional en la relación entre variables explicativas e ingresos.”

    From Changes in Peru's Gender Earning Gap: An Analysis from 1997 to 2021 (2023) · cites this paper as Ñopo (2008)

  • The Ñopo model restricts comparison only to differences between men and women with comparable characteristics (common support).

    “El modelo de Ñopo restringe la comparación únicamente a las diferencias entre hombres y mujeres con características comparables (soporte común).”

    From Changes in Peru's Gender Earning Gap: An Analysis from 1997 to 2021 (2023) · cites this paper as Ñopo (2008)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ñopo, H.
Affiliations
Inter-American Development Bank (US)
Corresponding author
Ñopo, Hugo
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Published
2008-05
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
290-299
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W2021582121
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
42.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
gender pay gap, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, common support, wage differentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review