Cited by 12Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Usage of glucometer is associated with improved glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Malaysian public primary care clinics: an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Open access
Mastura, I, Teng, CL, Mimi, O, Ho, BK, Kusiar, Z, Hasim, R·2013·Singapore Medical Journal

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been underutilised. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of introducing SMBG in primary care clinics in Malaysia. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted in five public primary care clinics in Malaysia. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (age range 35-65 years) not performing SMBG at the time of the study were randomised to receive either a glucometer for SMBG or usual care. Both groups of patients received similar diabetes care from the clinics. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled. Of these, 58 and 47 were randomised to intervention and control groups, respectively. After six months, the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level in the intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement of 1.3% (p = 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.6-2.0), relative to the control group that underwent usual care. The percentages of patients that reached the HbA1c treatment target of ≤ 7% were 14.0% and 32.1% in the control and intervention groups (p = 0.036), respectively. CONCLUSION: The usage of a glucometer improved glycaemic control, possibly due to the encouragement of greater self-care in the intervention group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11622/smedj.2013140

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mastura, I., Teng, C., Mimi, O., Ho, B., Kusiar, Z., & Hasim, R.
Affiliations
Selangor Business School (MY)
Corresponding author
Hasim, R
Venue
Singapore Medical Journal
Publisher
Medknow
Published
2013-07
Volume
54
Issue
07
Pages
391-395
ISSN
0037-5675 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083286702
Cited by
12
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Singapore Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, blood glucose meters, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, primary care, diabetes self-care, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Malaysia, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review