Cited by 34Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsBone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

Electrospinning and Evaluation of PHBV-Based Tissue Engineering Scaffolds with Different Fibre Diameters, Surface Topography and Compositions

Tong, Ho-Wang, Wang, Min, Lu, William W.·2012·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

While electrospinning is an effective technology for producing poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) micrometre-scale fibrous scaffolds for tissue regeneration, electrospinning of PHBV fibrous scaffolds composed of sub-micrometre fibres, surface-porous fibres or nanocomposite fibres is rarely explored. In this study, the average PHBV fibre diameter was successfully reduced to the sub-micrometre scale by dissolving a conductivity-enhancing salt in the polymer solution for electrospinning. Surface-porous fibres were made using a mixture of solvents, and carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) nanoparticles were incorporated into the fibres with the aid of an ultrasonic power source. Water contact angle measurements demonstrated that both fibre diameter reduction and CHA incorporation enhanced the wettability of the fibrous scaffolds. Tensile properties of the scaffolds were not undermined by the reduction of fibre diameter and the presence of surface pores. In vitro biological evaluation using a human osteoblast-like cell line (SaOS-2) demonstrated that all types of fibrous scaffolds supported cell attachment, spreading and proliferation. Analysis of cell morphology revealed similar projected cell areas on all types of scaffolds. However, cells on sub-micrometre fibres possessed a lower cell aspect ratio than cells on microfibres. The reduction of fibre diameter to the sub-micrometre scale enhanced cell proliferation after 14 days cell culture, while the incorporation of CHA…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/092050611x560708

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, H.-W., Wang, M., & Lu, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
779-806
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2052052477
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), electrospun scaffolds, fiber diameter, surface topography, nanocomposite fibres, wettability, tensile properties, Saos-2 cells, osteoblast-like cells, cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity, tissue engineering scaffolds
MeSH terms
Polyhydroxybutyrates, Alkaline Phosphatase, Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Cell Movement, Humans, Materials Testing, Osteoblasts, Polyesters, Salts, Solvents, Surface Properties, Tensile Strength, Water, Porosity, Durapatite, Bone Substitutes, Tissue Engineering, Cell Proliferation, Nanoparticles, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review