Cited by 4Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity Studies

Raamses, Pithom, and the Exodus: A Critical Evaluation of Ex 1:11

Schipper, Bernd Ulrich·2015·Vetus Testamentum

Abstract

Up to the present, the brief notice on the storage cities of “Pithom” and “Raamses” and the forced labour of the Israelites in Ex 1:11 has been taken as the historical nucleus of a possible exodus scenario under Ramesses ii. This article presents a critical evaluation of the classical theory, taking into account recent insights in Archaeology, Egyptology, and Philology. Since a number of arguments call the classical theory into question, a historical background of Ex 1:11 in the late 7th century bce becomes more likely, when Judahites had to perform forced labour for the Egyptian hegemon in the Southern Levant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15685330-12301194

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Aḥituv, 1970, “Pashhur”, iej, 20, 95
  2. Albertz, 2012, Exodus
  3. Allen, 2002, “A Report of Bedouin (3.5)”, 16
  4. Bietak, 2003, “Dab ca, Tell ed-”, 351
  5. Carr, 2006, “What is Required to Identify Pre-Priestly Narrative Connections between Genesis and Exodus? Some General Reflections and Specific Cases”, 159
  6. Collins, 2008, “The Biblical Pithom and Tell el-Mashkuta: A Critique of Some Recent Theories on Exodus 1,11”, sjot22, 135
  7. Gardiner, 1933, “Tanis and Pi-Ra cmesse: A Retraction”, jea, 19, 122
  8. Gardiner, 1937, Late Egyptian Miscellanies, 7
  9. Gesenius, 2007, Hebräisches und Aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament, 4
  10. Gitin, 1998, “Philistia in Transition: The Tenth Century bceand Beyond”, 162
  11. Goedicke, 1986, “Tell er-Retabe”, 353
  12. Görg, 2000, “Mose—Name und Namensträger”, 189, 17
  13. Graham, 2003, “Tanis”, 348
  14. Herrmann, 1973, Israel in Egypt
  15. Holladay, 2003, “Wadi Tumilat”, 878
  16. James, 1993, The Late Bronze Egyptian Garrison at Beth Shan: A Study of Levels viiand viii, vol i
  17. Jansen-Winkeln, 2002, “Die Schischak-Schoschenk-Gleichung: Weitere Begründung der konventionellen Sichtweise”, 113
  18. Jansen-Winkeln, 2007, “Pithom”, wibilex
  19. Kitchen, 1998, “Egyptians and Hebrews from Ra camses to Jericho”, The Origin of Early Israel, 65
  20. Koehler, 2001, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament ( halot)
  21. Loprieno, 1998, “ Nḥsjder Südländer”, 211
  22. Malamat, 1997, “The Exodus: Egyptian Analogies”, 15
  23. Moore, 2011, Biblical History and Israel’s Past
  24. Montet, 1930, “Tanis, Avaris et Pi-Ramsès”, rb, 39, 5
  25. Nöldeke, 1869, “Die so genannte Grundschrift des Pentateuchs”, 1
  26. Osing, 1976, Die Nominalbildung des Ägyptischen
  27. Otto, 2000, “Die Mose-Figur als Gegenentwurf politischer Theologie zur neuassyrischen Königsideologie im 7. Jh. v. Chr.”, 43
  28. Pusch, 2003, “Piramesse”, 48
  29. Ragazzoli, 2008, Éloges de la ville en Égypte ancienne. Histoire et littérature
  30. Ranke, 1909, “Aegypten iii: Aegypten und das Alte Testament”, rgg i, 202
  31. Redford, 1987, “An Egyptian Perspective on the Exodus Tradition”, 137
  32. Redmount, 1989, On an Egyptian/Asiatic Frontier: An Archaeological History of the Wadi Tumilat, 6 volumes
  33. Redmount, 1998, “Bitter Lives: Israel in and out of Egypt”, 58
  34. Renz, 1995, Die althebräischen Inschriften Teil 1: Text und Kommentar
  35. Röllig, 2003, Siegel und Gewichte, ii
  36. Schmidt, 1988, Exodus, ii
  37. Spiegelberg, 1904, Der Aufenthalt Israels in Aegypten im Lichte der aegyptischen Monumente
  38. Uehlinger, 1988, “Der Amun-Tempel Ramses iii. in pꜣ-Kn cn, seine südpalästinischen Tempelgüter und der Übergang von der Ägypter- zur Philisterherrschaft: Ein Hinweis auf einige wenig beachtete Skarabäen”, zdpv, 104, 6
  39. Van Seters, 2001, “The Geography of the Exodus”, 343, 255
  40. Vergote, 1980, “A propos du nom de Moïse”, bseg, 4, 89
  41. Weippert, 1990, “Die Petition eines Erntearbeiters aus Mɘṣad Ḥăšavyāhūund die Syntax althebräischer erzählender Prosa”, 449

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Schipper, B. U.
Affiliations
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Schipper, Bernd Ulrich
Venue
Vetus Testamentum
Published
2015-05-08
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
265-288
ISSN
  • 0042-4935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5330
OpenAlex
W290895325
Cited by
4
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Vetus Testamentum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Exodus, Ramesses II, Southern Levant, 7th century BC, biblical historiography, Egyptian archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review