Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisAncient Egypt and Archaeology

The Jubilee Calendar

Mayshar, Joram·2020·Vetus Testamentum

Abstract

I propose that the jubilee legislation intended to provide an alternative calendar system to replace the prevailing one, based on the year of the reigning monarch. In that alternative calendar, the Day of Atonement on which the jubilee was declared was to serve as the substitute for the date of the king’s accession to the throne. This proposal provides a new interpretation of Lev 25:20–22 and resolves multiple difficulties on the alignment of the sabbatical and jubilee year-counts. It implies that the jubilee cycle was intended to be forty-nine years long, with coincidence of the jubilee fallow and that of the seventh sabbatical year.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15685330-12341451

Cites

7 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 13 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Mayshar, J.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Mayshar, Joram
Venue
Vetus Testamentum
Published
2020-12-03
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
219-232
ISSN
  • 0042-4935 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5330
OpenAlex
W3112635541
Cited by
0
References
20
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Vetus Testamentum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
jubilee, sabbatical year, biblical calendar, Day of Atonement, biblical chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review