Dynamics of Hierarchy Formation: the Sequential Development of Dominance Relationships
Abstract
A method for investigating the behavioral sequences used in forming dominance hierarchies is presented. There are four possible sequences for the formation of the first two dominance relationships in groups of three individuals (triads). Designating the winner in the first relationship formed as the initial dominant, the loser as the initial subordinate, and the animal not involved as the bystander, the four possible sequences are: (1) the initial dominants goes on to dominate the bystander (Double Dominance), (2) the bystander later dominates the initial subordinate (Double Subordinance), (3) the bystander later dominates the initial dominant (Bystander Dominates Initial Dominant), and (4) the initial subordinate later dominates the bystander (Initial Subordinate Dominates Bystander). Although each sequence has an equal probability of occurrence if dominance relationships are formed randomly, two of the sequences have different implications for the formation of the empirically common linear and near linear hierarchies than the other two. Linear and near linear hierarchies are, by definition, composed of all or nearly all triads with transitive dominance relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C, and A dominates C), while hierarchies far from linearity have many triads with intransitive relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C, and C dominates A). Double Dominance and Double Subordinance sequences guarantee the formation of triads with transitive dominance relationships,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stable social hierarchies emerge when costs for continued conflict are high, meaning that all individuals benefit from establishing resolved social dominance relationships.
“Stable social hierarchies emerge when costs for continued conflict are high, meaning that all individuals benefit from establishing resolved social dominance relationships [2].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119 · see citing works
Temporal dynamics of social hierarchy formation and maintenance in male mice
Williamson, C. M., Lee, W., & Curley, J. P. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.03.004 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Evolution of cooperation with asymmetric social interactions
Su, Q., Allen, B., & Plotkin, J. B. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2113468118 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society
Hobson, E. A., & DeDeo, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004411 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Williamson, C. M., Romeo, R. D., & Curley, J. P. (2017) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.11.001 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The Third Man: hierarchy formation in Wikipedia
Lerner, J., & Lomi, A. (2017) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0043-2 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Milewski, T. M., Lee, W., Young, R. L., Hofmann, H. A., & Curley, J. P. (2025) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011548 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chase, I. D.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chase, Ivan D.
- ORCID
- Chase, Ivan D.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 218-239
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2132109709
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- dominance relations, behavioral sequences, linear hierarchy, triads, chickens, bystander effect, social dominance, group development, animal social behavior, tetrads
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review