Cited by 204Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Dynamics of Hierarchy Formation: the Sequential Development of Dominance Relationships

Chase, Ivan D.·1982·Behaviour

Abstract

A method for investigating the behavioral sequences used in forming dominance hierarchies is presented. There are four possible sequences for the formation of the first two dominance relationships in groups of three individuals (triads). Designating the winner in the first relationship formed as the initial dominant, the loser as the initial subordinate, and the animal not involved as the bystander, the four possible sequences are: (1) the initial dominants goes on to dominate the bystander (Double Dominance), (2) the bystander later dominates the initial subordinate (Double Subordinance), (3) the bystander later dominates the initial dominant (Bystander Dominates Initial Dominant), and (4) the initial subordinate later dominates the bystander (Initial Subordinate Dominates Bystander). Although each sequence has an equal probability of occurrence if dominance relationships are formed randomly, two of the sequences have different implications for the formation of the empirically common linear and near linear hierarchies than the other two. Linear and near linear hierarchies are, by definition, composed of all or nearly all triads with transitive dominance relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C, and A dominates C), while hierarchies far from linearity have many triads with intransitive relationships (A dominates B, B dominates C, and C dominates A). Double Dominance and Double Subordinance sequences guarantee the formation of triads with transitive dominance relationships,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853982x00364

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chase, I. D.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Chase, Ivan D.
Venue
Behaviour
Published
1982
Volume
80
Issue
3-4
Pages
218-239
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W2132109709
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
dominance relations, behavioral sequences, linear hierarchy, triads, chickens, bystander effect, social dominance, group development, animal social behavior, tetrads

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review