Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys
Abstract
The question whether rhesus monkeys reconcile was empirically translated as: Do they seek non-agonistic contact with former adversaries? The study concerned a captive group of forty-one monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Participants in 350 aggressive incidents were followed both immediately after the incident and during matched control periods. Comparison of the two sets of data showed that: - After the incident former opponents had an increased tendency to approach and contact each other. - The attraction between them was selective, i.e., the number of inter-opponent contacts showed not only an absolute but also a relative increase. - Also former alliance partners showed attraction to each other. - Inter-opponent contacts were behaviorally distinctive. The most characteristic behavior patterns were embrace, lipsmack and redirected threat. - Conciliatory tendency increased with general bond strength between individuals, even though the first measure had a built-in correction for the second. - A higher conciliatory tendency among matrilineal relatives could be fully explained by the above mentioned influence of bond strength. - General effects of agonistic interactions included a grooming increase for violent aggressors, a grooming decrease for victim of severe aggression, and an increased receipt of grooming for mild aggressors. - Grooming of outsiders by violent aggressors depended on the intensity of the bond between aggressor and victim. Therefore, this grooming behavior was interp…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The matched control design controlled for changes in the birds' behavior expected throughout the day, isolating changes due to encounters.
“By employing this powerful “matched control” design [17,18,19], we controlled for changes in the birds’ behavior that would be expected throughout the day, due to factors such as fixed feeding times, to isolate changes due to the encounters themselves.”
From Evaluating the Behavior and Temperament of African Penguins in a Non-Contact Animal Encounter Program (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys
de Waal, F. B. M. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1471 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Consolation as possible expression of sympathetic concern among chimpanzees
Romero, T., Castellanos, M. A., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1006991107 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Self-citationShared neural coding for social hierarchy and reward value in primate amygdala
Munuera, J., Rigotti, M., & Salzman, C. D. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0082-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Saiyed, S. T., Hopper, L. M., & Cronin, K. A. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060326 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Cafazzo, S., Marshall-Pescini, S., Lazzaroni, M., Virányi, Z., & Range, F. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.171553 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Competition Elicits more Physical Affiliation between Male than Female Friends
Benenson, J. F., White, M. M., Pandiani, D. M., Hillyer, L. J., Kantor, S., Markovits, H., & Wrangham, R. W. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26544-9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- De Waal, F. B. M., & Yoshihara, D.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1983
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 224-241
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W1974562461
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- reconciliation, rhesus monkeys, alliance partners, bond strength, matrilineal kinship, grooming, aggression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review