Cited by 433Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys

De Waal, Frans B.M., Yoshihara, Deborah·1983·Behaviour

Abstract

The question whether rhesus monkeys reconcile was empirically translated as: Do they seek non-agonistic contact with former adversaries? The study concerned a captive group of forty-one monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Participants in 350 aggressive incidents were followed both immediately after the incident and during matched control periods. Comparison of the two sets of data showed that: - After the incident former opponents had an increased tendency to approach and contact each other. - The attraction between them was selective, i.e., the number of inter-opponent contacts showed not only an absolute but also a relative increase. - Also former alliance partners showed attraction to each other. - Inter-opponent contacts were behaviorally distinctive. The most characteristic behavior patterns were embrace, lipsmack and redirected threat. - Conciliatory tendency increased with general bond strength between individuals, even though the first measure had a built-in correction for the second. - A higher conciliatory tendency among matrilineal relatives could be fully explained by the above mentioned influence of bond strength. - General effects of agonistic interactions included a grooming increase for violent aggressors, a grooming decrease for victim of severe aggression, and an increased receipt of grooming for mild aggressors. - Grooming of outsiders by violent aggressors depended on the intensity of the bond between aggressor and victim. Therefore, this grooming behavior was interp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853983x00237

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The matched control design controlled for changes in the birds' behavior expected throughout the day, isolating changes due to encounters.

    “By employing this powerful “matched control” design [17,18,19], we controlled for changes in the birds’ behavior that would be expected throughout the day, due to factors such as fixed feeding times, to isolate changes due to the encounters themselves.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Waal, F. B. M., & Yoshihara, D.
Venue
Behaviour
Published
1983
Volume
85
Issue
3-4
Pages
224-241
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W1974562461
Cited by
433
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
reconciliation, rhesus monkeys, alliance partners, bond strength, matrilineal kinship, grooming, aggression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review