Cited by 262Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

Consolation as possible expression of sympathetic concern among chimpanzees

Open access
Romero, Teresa, Castellanos, Miguel A., de Waal, Frans B. M.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Chimpanzees are known to spontaneously provide contact comfort to recent victims of aggression, a behavior known as consolation. Similar behavior in human children is attributed to empathic or sympathetic concern. In line with this empathy hypothesis, chimpanzee consolation has been shown to reduce the recipient's state of arousal, hence to likely alleviate distress. Other predictions from the empathy hypothesis have rarely been tested, however, owing to small sample sizes in previous studies. An exceptionally large database of spontaneous consolation in two outdoor-housed groups of chimpanzees lends further support to the empathy hypothesis in that consolation occurred disproportionally between individuals that are socially close (i.e., kin and affiliation partners) and was more typical of females than males, which differences are also known of human empathy. These effects were demonstrated using generalized linear mixed models, which control multiple variables at once. An exception to the above pattern was formed by the highest-ranking males, which frequently offered consolation to victims of aggression, probably as part of their general policing function in chimpanzee society. Consolation occurred more frequently in the absence of reconciliation between former opponents, suggesting that actors are sensitive to the contact need of victims of aggression, which may be greater if the aggressor ignores them. That consolation is an integrated part of close mutual relationships is supported by the tendency for it being reciprocated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1006991107

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human and non-human females are more empathic than males.

    “Consistent with previous findings that human and non-human females are more empathic than males (5–7)”

    From Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats (2011) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romero, T., Castellanos, M. A., & de Waal, F. B. M.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Department of Methodology of the Social Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid, Spain
  • Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
107
Issue
27
Pages
12110-12115
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2143440118
Cited by
262
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Emory University
  • National Institutes of Health (RR‐00165)
  • Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University (RR 00165)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
aggression, kinship, social affiliation, sex differences, social rank, reconciliation, reciprocity, animal social behavior
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Arousal, Pan troglodytes, Conflict, Psychological, Empathy, Female, Male, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review