The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variation in Schooling and Aggression Amongst Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata) Populations in Trinidad
Abstract
Schooling behaviour is an effective defence against predation but, since it depends on coordinated behaviour, it may restrict individual competition for limited resources. We tested the hypothesis that levels of individual aggression will be reduced in fish with a high schooling tendency by comparing the behaviour of guppies, Poecilia reticulata, from eight Trinidad populations. Schooling tendency was assayed in the wild. Fish were then transferred to the laboratory where aggression was measured when groups of eight males foraged on a small, but profitable, food patch. An inverse relationship between schooling tendency and intensity of aggression emerged. Guppies from populations without fish predators displayed a wide range of aggressive behaviours including active patch defence by the most dominant individual. Conversely, populations experiencing high predation, and with well-developed schooling behaviour, showed little aggression. Female guppies (three population tested) also varied in level of aggression and aggression was present in laboratory-bred as well as wild-caught fish. Individual aggression increased with group size but was independent of tank size. These results point towards a trade-off between antipredator behaviour and resource defence and confirm that schooling has associated costs as well as benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
ELGAR, M. A. (1989) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00636.x · Cited by 1,119
Cited by
Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies
Endler, J. A. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88956-9 · Cited by 600
Development of predator defences in fishes
Fuiman, L. A., & Magurran, A. E. (1994) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/bf00044127 · Cited by 347
Self-citationRapid color change in fish and amphibians – function, regulation, and emerging applications
Nilsson Sköld, H., Aspengren, S., & Wallin, M. (2013) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/pcmr.12040 · Cited by 329
The effects of mixed-species assemblage on the behaviour and welfare of fish held in home aquaria
Sloman, K. A., Baldwin, L., McMahon, S., & Snellgrove, D. (2011) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.008 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Magurran, A. E., & Seghers, B. H.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 214-234
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2031471516
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in Schooling and Aggression Amongst Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata) Populations in Trinidad. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853991x00292
- The paper
- Magurran, A. E., & Seghers, B. H. (1991). Variation in Schooling and Aggression Amongst Guppy (Poecilia Reticulata) Populations in Trinidad. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853991x00292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.