CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overview

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gorillas' Vocalizations During Rest Periods: Signals of Impending Departure?

Stewart, Kelly J., Harcourt, Alexander H.·1994·Behaviour
DOI 10.1163/156853994x00127
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Animal signals have been interpreted as indicating something about the signaller's internal state and hence its subsequent behaviour, while at the same time eliciting a response from the receiver. Such signals are often given when the costs and benefits of an action depend on what others do. This interpretation of meaning and function of signals has been applied primarily to ritualized competitive or courtship displays. Here we use the approach to analyse another context of signalling and a more subtle communicatory behaviour. Gorillas live in small cohesive groups whose synchronized activities alternate between travel/ feeding periods and resting periods. We present data on gorillas' vocalizations - the grunts - prior to a coordinated departure from a rest period. We suggest that gorillas use these signals to indicate their readiness to depart and to assess that readiness in others. Vocal activity increased significantly towards the end of rest periods, due both to individuals calling at higher rates, and to a greater number of vocalizers. This increase in vocal activity was not associated with a greater clumping of animals, nor with an increase in non-rest activities, and therefore appeared to be related to subsequent departure. The frequent exchange of grunts supports the notion that gorillas might use the calls of others to assess their readiness to depart. We speculate that such signalling could function to synchronize the behaviour of group members and lead to coordinated group movement.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853994x00127

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 138

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stewart, K. J., & Harcourt, A. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Behaviour
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
1994
Volume
130
Issue
1-2
Pages
29-40
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
DOI
10.1163/156853994x00127
OpenAlex
W2002466756
Cited by
137
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
Keywords
gorillas, vocalizations, grunts, rest periods, animal communication, collective synchronization, social cohesion, primate behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review