Mate switching and copulation behaviour in the Adélie penguin
Abstract
[In monogamous species of birds sperm competition may result from either extra-pair copulations or mate switching. Copulation behaviour in individuals involved in extra-pair activity is well documented while little attention has been paid to mate switching. The aim of this study was to examine copulation behaviour in the Adelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae), a species in which females copulate sequentially with more than one male. 14.9% of females switched mates during the pre-laying period; all of these females engaged in successful copulations with both initial and final males. An estimated 9.8% of females engaged in successful EPCs over the same time period. Females that switched mates had on average 8 successful copulations with their initial partner while females that engaged in extra-pair copulation attempts had on average only 0.5 successful copulations with their extra-pair partner. These same females had on average 17 pair copulations per clutch. So in both cases females had significantly more copulations with their final, pair male than their initial partner or extra-pair partner. Frequencies of copulation that are higher than necessary for fertilisation are consistent with mechanisms of both last male sperm precedence and proportional representation. However there is no support for last male sperm precedence from either diurnal or seasonal patterns of copulation relative to fertilisation. It appears that a high frequency of copulation may have evolved in pair males…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extra-pair copulation has been described in Humboldt penguins and Adélie penguins.
“Although long believed a monogamous species, extra-pair copulation has been described in different penguin species: the Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti; Schwartz et al. 1999) and the Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae; Hunter et al. 1995;Hunter and Davis 1998;Pilastro et al. 2001;Sakaoka et al. 2014).”
From Molecular Genetics Unveiled Unknown Family Relationships and Hybrids in an Ex-Situ Colony of African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) (2018) · cites this paper as Hunter et al. 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modesto, P., Biolatti, C., Favaro, L., Colussi, S., Peletto, S., Piga, S., Riina, M. V., Pessani, D., Trincas, E., Isaja, V., et al. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esy032 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hunter, F. M., Miller, G. D., & Davis, L. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 691-707
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W1985001212
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Keywords
- mate switching, extra-pair copulation, copulation, sperm competition, Pygoscelis adeliae, monogamy, last-male sperm precedence, proportional representation, female mating behavior, fertilization success, pre-laying period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review