The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploration, Aggressive Behaviour and Dominance in Pair-Wise Confrontations of Juvenile Male Great Tits
Abstract
In the development of social dominance, constitutional behavioural characteristics may play an important role apart from morphological traits. Previous work has shown that juvenile male great tits Parus major differ consistently in their early exploratory behaviour and can be classified as fast and superficial explorers or slow and thorough explorers. This study investigated whether these individual differences in exploratory behaviour are related to aggressive behaviour, and whether this affects dominance. In an experimental set-up, pair-wise fights were observed. The obtained data were corrected for possible influences of morphological traits. Consistent individual differences in aggressive behaviour were found, indicating that juvenile great tits can be characterised by that behaviour. Fast explorers started more fights than slow explorers, and birds that started more fights also won more fights. An additional experiment with pairs of fast and slow explorers confirmed that fast explorers won more fights than slow explorers. In conclusion, we demonstrated that individual differences in exploratory behaviour are related to aggressive behaviour, which affects dominance. The striking agreement of these findings with studies of rodents and pigs is discussed. It is suggested that the behaviour of fast explorers agrees with an active style of coping with stress, while the behaviour of the slow explorers resembles a passive coping style.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview
Sih, A., Bell, A., & Johnson, J. C. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009 · Cited by 2,861
Korte, S. M., Koolhaas, J. M., Wingfield, J. C., & McEwen, B. S. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.08.009 · Cited by 1,097
KORSTEN, P., MUELLER, J. C., HERMANNSTÄDTER, C., BOUWMAN, K. M., DINGEMANSE, N. J., DRENT, P. J., LIEDVOGEL, M., MATTHYSEN, E., Van OERS, K., Van OVERVELD, T., et al. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04518.x · Cited by 123
Self-citationDoes it always pay to defend one's nest? A case study in African penguin
Traisnel, G., & Pichegru, L. (2018) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12704 · Cited by 31
Boldness at the nest predicts foraging and diving behaviour of female but not male African penguins
Traisnel, G., & Pichegru, L. (2019) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.02.003 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Verbeek, M. E. M., Boon, A., & Drent, P. J.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 945-963
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2033454995
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.