Cited by 27

Born to be bad: Agonistic behaviour in hatchling saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus)

Christian, Keith A., Webb, Grahame J., McGuinness, Keith A., Brien, Matthew L., Lang, Jeffrey W.·2013·Behaviour

Abstract

Detailed observations on groups of captive saltwater crocodile (Crocodylus porosus) hatchlings revealed sporadic periods of intense agonistic interactions, with 16 highly distinctive behaviours, in the morning (06:00–08:00 h) and evening (17:00–20:00 h) in shallow water. Ontogenetic changes in agonistic behaviour were quantified by examining 18 different groups of hatchlings, six groups each at 1 week, 13 weeks and 40 weeks after hatching. Agonistic interactions between hatchlings at 1 week of age (mean 7.3 ± 0.65/night) were not well-defined and varied in intensity (low, medium, high), number of individuals that were aggressive, and the outcome, while most interactions involved contact (94.5%). There were also clutch specific differences in the frequency of agonistic interactions. At 13 and 40 weeks, a more hierarchal dominance relationship appeared to be established which primarily involved aggression–submission interactions. Agonistic interactions were more frequent (13 weeks 9.7 ± 0.61/night; 40 weeks 22.2 ± 0.61/night) and intense (medium, high), but shorter in duration, in which the subordinate individual fled in response to an approach by a dominant animal that often gave chase but did not make contact. While the full repertoire of behaviour was displayed by hatchlings at 1 week of age, a smaller subset based on dominance status was displayed among 13- and 40-week-old hatchlings. Agonistic behaviour occurs in C. porosus shortly after hatching and is important in establ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/1568539x-00003078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christian, K. A., Webb, G. J., McGuinness, K. A., Brien, M. L., & Lang, J. W.
Venue
Behaviour
Published
2013
Volume
150
Issue
7
Pages
737-762
ISSN
  • 0005-7959
  • 1568-539X
Cited by
27
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review