The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A phylogenetic tree of nematodes based on about 1200 full-length small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences
Open accessAbstract
As a result of the scarcity of informative morphological and anatomical characters, nematode systematics have always been volatile. Differences in the appreciation of these characters have resulted in numerous classifications and this greatly confuses scientific communication. An advantage of the use of molecular data is that it allows for an enormous expansion of the number of characters. Here we present a phylogenetic tree based on 1215 small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (ca 1700 bp each) covering a wide range of nematode taxa. Of the 19 nematode orders mentioned by De Ley et al. (2006) 15 are represented here. Compared with Holterman et al. (2006) the number of taxa analysed has been tripled. This did not result in major changes in the clade subdivision of the phylum, although a decrease in the number of well supported nodes was observed. Especially at the family level and below we observed a considerable congruence between morphology and ribosomal DNA-based nematode systematics and, in case of discrepancies, morphological or anatomical support could be found for the alternative grouping in most instances. The extensiveness of convergent evolution is one of the most striking phenomena observed in the phylogenetic tree presented here – it is hard to find a morphological, ecological or biological characteristic that has not arisen at least twice during nematode evolution. Convergent evolution appears to be an important additional explanation for the seemingly persistent volatility of nematode systematics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Top 10 plant‐parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology
Jones, J. T., Haegeman, A., Danchin, E. G. J., Gaur, H. S., Helder, J., Jones, M. G. K., Kikuchi, T., Manzanilla‐López, R., Palomares‐Rius, J. E., Wesemael, W. M. L., et al. (2013) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12057 · Cited by 2,315
Self-citationKikuchi, T., Cotton, J. A., Dalzell, J. J., Hasegawa, K., Kanzaki, N., McVeigh, P., Takanashi, T., Tsai, I. J., Assefa, S. A., Cock, P. J. A., et al. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002219 · Cited by 428
Functional roles of effectors of plant-parasitic nematodes
Haegeman, A., Mantelin, S., Jones, J. T., & Gheysen, G. (2012) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2011.10.040 · Cited by 280
Wilbers, R. H. P., Schneiter, R., Holterman, M. H. M., Drurey, C., Smant, G., Asojo, O. A., Maizels, R. M., & Lozano-Torres, J. L. (2018) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1007300 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Megen, H., van den Elsen, S., Holterman, M., Karssen, G., Mooyman, P., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., Bakker, J., & Helder, J.
- Venue
- Nematology
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 927-950
- ISSN
- 1388-5545 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5411
- OpenAlex
- W2102776218
- Cited by
- 588
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phylogenetic tree of nematodes based on about 1200 full-length small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156854109x456862
- The paper
- van Megen, H., van den Elsen, S., Holterman, M., Karssen, G., Mooyman, P., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., Bakker, J., & Helder, J. (2009). A phylogenetic tree of nematodes based on about 1200 full-length small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Nematology. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854109x456862
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.