Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,091

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review

Liston, E.M., Martinu, L., Wertheimer, M.R.·1993·Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

Abstract

Since the earliest systematic research during the 1960s, the field of materials surface modification by 'cold', low-pressure plasma treatment has undergone an enormous expansion. Much of this expansion has taken place in recent years, particularly in the surface modification of polymeric materials, for which there now exist numerous industrial applications (enhancement of paint adhesion, improved bonding in polymer matrix composites, etc.). In this paper, we provide a critical review of the development and trends in this field; reference is also made to other surface modification techniques, particularly to corona treatment, and comparisons are made wherever appropriate. We begin with a brief overview of adhesion theory, and of the physics and chemistry of 'cold' plasmas. Next, interaction mechanisms between a plasma and a polymer surface are examined; these include physical bombardment by energetic particles and by ultraviolet photons, and chemical reactions at or near the surface. The resulting four main effects, namely cleaning, ablation, crosslinking, and surface chemical modification, occur together in a complex synergy, which depends on many parameters controlled by the operator. In spite of this complexity, for there are still many unanswered questions, it is nevertheless possible to optimize the main set of parameters governing a given process, and then to reliably reproduce the process outcome. Three industrially important systems, for which many research results exist, are then separately examined, namely: (i) polymer-polymer bonding, (ii) polymer-matrix composites, and (iii) metal-polymer bonding. Finally, we present a brief overview of commercial plasma reactors for industrial (non-semiconductor) purposes, and of process considerations for efficient use of such equipment. We foresee that the use of plasma processes will continue to expand, because they have unique capabilities, are economically attractive, and are 'friendly' towards the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856193x00600

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,091

Metadata

Authors
Liston, E. M., Martinu, L., & Wertheimer, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
Published
1993-01
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1091-1127
ISSN
  • 0169-4243 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5616
OpenAlex
W2028026272
Cited by
1,091
References
0
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856193x00600
The paper
Liston, E. M., Martinu, L., & Wertheimer, M. R. (1993). Plasma surface modification of polymers for improved adhesion: a critical review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856193x00600

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.