The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro
Abstract
We investigated the potential of a nanofiber-based poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) scaffold to be used for cartilage reconstruction. The mechanical properties of the nanofiber scaffold, degradation of the scaffold and cellular responses to the scaffold under mechanical stimulation were studied. Three different types of scaffold (lactic acid/glycolic acid content ratio = 75 : 25, 50 : 50, or a blend of 75 : 25 and 50 : 50) were tested. The tensile modulus, ultimate tensile stress and corresponding strain of the scaffolds were similar to those of skin and were slightly lower than those of human cartilage. This suggested that the nanofiber scaffold was sufficiently mechanically stable to withstand implantation and to support regenerated cartilage. The 50 : 50 PLGA scaffold was degraded faster than 75 : 25 PLGA, probably due to the higher hydrophilic glycolic acid content in the former. The nanofiber scaffold was degraded faster than a block-type scaffold that had a similar molecular weight. Therefore, degradation of the scaffold depended on the lactic acid/glycolic acid content ratio and might be controlled by mixing ratio of blend PLGA. Cellular responses were evaluated by examining toxicity, cell proliferation and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation using freshly isolated chondrocytes from porcine articular cartilage. The scaffolds were non-toxic, and cell proliferation and ECM formation in nanofiber scaffolds were superior to those in membrane-type scaffolds. Intermittent hydrostatic pressure applied to cell-seeded nanofiber scaffolds increased chondrocyte proliferation and ECM formation. In conclusion, our nanofiber-based PLGA scaffold has the potential to be used for cartilage reconstruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Improved Cellular Infiltration in Electrospun Fiber via Engineered Porosity
Nam, J., Huang, Y., Agarwal, S., & Lannutti, J. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0306 · Cited by 414
Nanofibers for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications
Rasouli, R., Barhoum, A., Bechelany, M., & Dufresne, A. (2019) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201800256 · Cited by 319
Applications of electrospun nanofibers
Fang, J., Niu, H., Lin, T., & Wang, X. (2008) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s11434-008-0319-0 · Cited by 313
Recent advances in PLGA-based biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration
Jin, S., Xia, X., Huang, J., Yuan, C., Zuo, Y., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.067 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, H. J., Lee, C. H., Cho, I. H., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, I. A., Park, K.-D., Yui, N., & Shin, J.-W.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 103-119
- ISSN
- 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5624
- OpenAlex
- W1974784466
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856206774879126
- The paper
- Shin, H. J., Lee, C. H., Cho, I. H., Kim, Y.-J., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, I. A., Park, K.-D., Yui, N., & Shin, J.-W. (2006). Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856206774879126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.