The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage
Abstract
New cartilage formation has been successfully achieved by technology referred to as tissue engineering. Polymers and hydrogels such as poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate, and poly(ethylene) and poly(propylene) hydrogels have been used as cell carriers to regenerate cartilage in the nude mouse model. The next step toward human applications of engineered cartilage is to demonstrate their potential in immunocompetent animal models. This study compared the suitability of three polymers for generating tissue engineered elastic cartilage using autologous cells in an immuno-competent porcine animal model. Auricular cartilage was obtained from pigs. Chondrocytes were isolated onto fiber based poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) scaffolds or suspended in calcium alginate or pluronic F127 gel at constant concentrations. Chondrocyte-polymer constructs were either implanted (PGA) or injected (calcium alginate and pluronic) as autologous implants subcutaneously into the pigs from which the cells had been isolated. Specimens were harvested and analyzed grossly and historically after 6 weeks in vivo. All explants demonstrated cartilage formation to a variable degree. When using PGA or calcium alginate, the overall histological appearance of the tissue formed is that of fibrocartilage with thick bundles of collagen dispersed in the tissue. When using pluronics as scaffold, histologic features resemble those of native elastic cartilage, showing a more organized arrangement of the cells, which seems to correlate to functional properties as elastin presence in the tissue engineered cartilage. Elastic cartilage engineered in an immunocompetent animal model varies with the type of polymer used. The behavior of the cell-polymer constructs is not fully understood and outcome seems to be related to several factors, including inflammatory reaction. Further studies with similar models are needed to determine the feasibility of engineering tissue generated from different cell-polymer constructs prior to human application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hydrogels for biomedical applications
Hoffman, A. S. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00239-3 · Cited by 4,864
Hydrogels for biomedical applications
Hoffman, A. S. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010 · Cited by 3,396
Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials
Yu, L., & Ding, J. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b713009k · Cited by 1,545
Bryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Chiappetta, D. A., & Sosnik, A. (2007) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.022 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, Y., Rodriguez, A., Vacanti, M., Ibarra, C., Arevalo, C., & Vacanti, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 475-487
- ISSN
- 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5624
- OpenAlex
- W2045274824
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856298x00578
- The paper
- Cao, Y., Rodriguez, A., Vacanti, M., Ibarra, C., Arevalo, C., & Vacanti, C. A. (1998). Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856298x00578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.