Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage

Yilin Cao, Rodriguez, Angela, Vacanti, Martin, Ibarra, Clemente, Arevalo, Carlos, Vacanti, Charles A.·1998·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

New cartilage formation has been successfully achieved by technology referred to as tissue engineering. Polymers and hydrogels such as poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate, and poly(ethylene) and poly(propylene) hydrogels have been used as cell carriers to regenerate cartilage in the nude mouse model. The next step toward human applications of engineered cartilage is to demonstrate their potential in immunocompetent animal models. This study compared the suitability of three polymers for generating tissue engineered elastic cartilage using autologous cells in an immuno-competent porcine animal model. Auricular cartilage was obtained from pigs. Chondrocytes were isolated onto fiber based poly(glycolic acid) (PGA) scaffolds or suspended in calcium alginate or pluronic F127 gel at constant concentrations. Chondrocyte-polymer constructs were either implanted (PGA) or injected (calcium alginate and pluronic) as autologous implants subcutaneously into the pigs from which the cells had been isolated. Specimens were harvested and analyzed grossly and historically after 6 weeks in vivo. All explants demonstrated cartilage formation to a variable degree. When using PGA or calcium alginate, the overall histological appearance of the tissue formed is that of fibrocartilage with thick bundles of collagen dispersed in the tissue. When using pluronics as scaffold, histologic features resemble those of native elastic cartilage, showing a more organized arrangement of the cells, which seems to correlate to functional properties as elastin presence in the tissue engineered cartilage. Elastic cartilage engineered in an immunocompetent animal model varies with the type of polymer used. The behavior of the cell-polymer constructs is not fully understood and outcome seems to be related to several factors, including inflammatory reaction. Further studies with similar models are needed to determine the feasibility of engineering tissue generated from different cell-polymer constructs prior to human application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856298x00578

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Cao, Y., Rodriguez, A., Vacanti, M., Ibarra, C., Arevalo, C., & Vacanti, C. A.
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
1998-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
475-487
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2045274824
Cited by
293
References
0
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856298x00578
The paper
Cao, Y., Rodriguez, A., Vacanti, M., Ibarra, C., Arevalo, C., & Vacanti, C. A. (1998). Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856298x00578

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.