The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 44 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Melchizedek Legend of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch
Open accessAbstract
Contemporary scholarship does not furnish a consensus concerning the possible provenance of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch. 1 In the context of the ambiguity and uncertainty about the cultural and theological origins of 2 Enoch, even distant voices of certain theological themes in the text become very important.One of these important theological reminiscences of 2 Enoch is the theme of Melchizedek-the legendary priest of God Most High. 2 Before giving an exposition of the content of the story it is worth mentioning that for a long time the legend was considered to be an interpolation in the text of 2 Enoch.Charles, Morfill, and Bonwetsch 3 thought that the theme of Melchizedek was a sort of appendix and did not belong to the main body of the text.For this reason, the legend was not investigated for a long time.Even Fred Horton in his fundamental work dedicated to the Melchizedek tradition ignores the material of 2 Enoch on the basis that it is found only in one recension. 4 On the contrary to these opinions, A. Vaillant successfully demonstrates that Melchizedek's legend is an integral part of 2 Enoch.F. Andersen supports this position.His new collation of manuscripts shows that the Melchizedek tradition is found in both recensions, in six manuscripts which represent four text families.His final conclusion is that "there is no evidence that the second part ever existed separately."
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Orlov argues that the Melchizedek story at the end of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch is not a later appendix but an integral part of the text, used to legitimize an alternative priestly line. The story engages and polemicizes against Jewish, targumic/rabbinic, Qumran, and Sethian traditions about priesthood, Noah, Shem, and Melchizedek.
Key findings
- The Melchizedek material appears in both recensions and in six manuscripts representing four text families, supporting its integral status rather than an interpolation, as older scholarship had claimed.
- 2 Enoch constructs a priestly succession from Methuselah to Nir, Lamech’s second son and Noah’s brother, and then to Melchizedek, bypassing the traditional Noah–Shem line. Melchizedek is born from Sothonim’s corpse, bears the badge of priesthood, is hidden, and is taken by Gabriel to Eden to become high priest after the Flood.
- The paper finds parallels with rabbinic and targumic traditions identifying Melchizedek with Shem, including the chronology that Shem lived 500 years after Arphaxad’s birth, that 290 years separated Arphaxad and Abram, and that Shem outlived Abraham by 35 years. It also cites b. Ned. 32b’s claim that Melchizedek was a priest but not his seed.
- Sectarian features include the sacrificial practice of tying all four animal legs, which the Mishnah treats as contrary to tradition, and parallels with the Nag Hammadi Melchizedek tractate and Sethian priestly motifs; 2 Enoch instead replaces the Sethian priestly line with a postdiluvian Melchizedek.
Methods
- The study is a textual and tradition-historical analysis of the Melchizedek chapters of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch, with attention to the short and long recensions and manuscript families.
- It compares the Slavonic Enoch material with targumic and rabbinic sources, Qumran texts such as the Genesis Apocryphon, 1 Enoch, Mishnaic sacrificial rules, and the Nag Hammadi Melchizedek tractate.
- The main analysis is exegetical and comparative, reconstructing the text’s priestly polemic and the possible community setting behind it.
Limitations
- The author states that the observations are fragmentary and do not allow a complete picture of the Melchizedek story’s cultural, historical, or theological provenance; the relationship to the temple at Leontopolis remains open.
- The author also notes that Qumran materials alone cannot explain the document because major Judaic and Qumranite symbols are absent.
- Evident from the text: the conclusions about a sectarian community and its polemics rest on comparative parallels and reconstructed theological conflict rather than direct external evidence, and some proposed identifications and parallels remain debated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
In the shorter recension, chapter 72 has the Lord say that Melchizedek will head priests in another generation as Seth did in this one.
“In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: “... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation.”57”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Noachic Traditions
The Melchizedek story contains references to Noachic tradition.
“Our previous analysis of Shem traditions in the Melchizedek story reveals also some references to the Noachic tradition.31”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
The phrases "children of Seth" and "race of the High priest" in Melchizedek have parallels with 2 Enoch's Melchizedek narrative and its material on Seth's priestly functions.
“These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Melch. 5:20
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Melch. 6:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
Chapter 71 of 2 Enoch presents a priestly line beginning with Seth and including Melchizedek, Enoch, and Nir.
“Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: “Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir....” 61”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Noachic Traditions
The Genesis Apocryphon also contains information about a transformed Enoch.
“The information about the transformed Enoch can be found also in the Genesis Apocryphon.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
Both traditions also remove the priestly line from Enoch's historical descendants.
“Both traditions are also interested in taking away the priestly line from Enoch's historical descendants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
Both Melchizedek and 2 Enoch emphasize Seth's priestly functions in connection with Melchizedek's priesthood.
“Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Conclusion
In 2 Enoch, Nir's destiny is linked to the 'clearing of the Earth.'
“In 2 Enoch the destiny of Nir is connected with”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusion
Nir is the final priest before the Flood's great destruction.
“Nir is the last priest before the great destruction of the Flood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusion
Sothonim hid herself from Nir during her pregnancy.
“The hypothesis is supported by the fact that Sothonim hid herself from Nir during days of her pregnancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Conclusion
In 2 Enoch, the Lord told Nir that He intended to send a great destruction upon the earth.
“The Lord told him that He planned”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Theology Department, Marquette University Milwaukee, WI
Scholarship today has no agreed view about where 2 (Slavonic) Enoch came from.
“Contemporary scholarship does not furnish a consensus concerning the possible provenance of 2 (Slavonic) Enoch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Noachic Traditions
Replacing the Noah-Shem line with the Nir-Melchizedek line shows that Noah is a main target of the author's polemic.
“A substitution of the line Noah-Shem for the line Nir-Melchizedek shows that one of the main targets of the author's polemic in 2 Enoch is in fact a Noah figure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
The grouping of Adam, Seth, and Enoch in 2 Enoch shows that Sethian tradition had value equal to Adam and Enoch traditions for the author.
“Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
The Slavonic Enoch constructs an alternative to the traditional rabbinic line from Methuselah, parallel to the official Noah-Shem line.
“the text of the Slavonic Enoch attempts to build an alternative to the traditional rabbinic line from Methuselah's priestly vocation, which can be some type of parallel to the official Noah-Shem line.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
Seth is rarely portrayed as a priest in Sethian traditions, where he is more often an astrologer, scribe, or head of a generation.
“In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] 62. "...of Adam [Abel], Enoch, [Noah] you, Melchizedek, [the Priest] of God [Most High] (12:7-11)." Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 63.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Shem Traditions
Rabbinic tradition widely identified Melchizedek with Shem, Noah's son and a descendant of Methuselah and Lamech.
“This identification of Melchizedek with Shem, son of Noah, descendant of Methuselah and Lamech by Rabbi Ishmael ben Elisha was very popular in rabbinic literature.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites b.Ned.32b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Rabbi Ishmael ben Elisha
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
Nir, Noah's younger brother, plays a key theological role in this shift.
“The important theological role in this shift is played by previously unknown Nir, the young brother of Noah.30”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
Melchizedek's final translation to heaven in 2 Enoch signals the end of the historical priestly line of Enoch's relatives.
“Melchizedek's final translation to heaven at the end of 2 Enoch also shows discontinuation of the historical priestly line of Enoch's relatives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Noachic Traditions
The practice of tying together all four legs of sacrificial animals had strong sectarian meaning for the authors of Mishnaic sacrificial rules.
“The practice of tying together all four legs had very strong sectarian meaning for the authors of Mishnaic sacrificial prescriptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites m.Tamid, 4:1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Noachic Traditions
The animal sacrifices in 2 Enoch suggest a possible connection with sectarian Judaism.
“Another feature of 2 Enoch which shows some possible connection between this text and the sectarian Judaism is the issue of animal sacrifices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
The author of 2 Enoch engages in theological polemic against traditional Judaic positions.
“We can see some sort of theological polemic by the author of 2 Enoch with traditional Judaic (targumic, rabbinic) positions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Shem Traditions
2 Enoch treats Melchizedek as Lamech's grandson.
“2 Enoch therefore considers Melchizedek as the grandson of Lamech.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
The Nag Hammadi tractate Melchizedek deserves attention because it echoes motifs found in 2 Enoch's Melchizedek story.
“One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Melch.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Shem Traditions
2 Enoch portrays Melchizedek as the continuation of a priestly line running from Methuselah through Nir to Melchizedek.
“2 Enoch presents Melchizedek as a continuation of the priestly line from Methuselah, son of Enoch, directly to the second son of Lamech, Nir (brother of Noah), and on to Melchizedek.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Another important point in identification of Shem and
The blessing of Shem in Gen 9:26 has notable parallels with Melchizedek's blessing of Abraham.
“Another important point in identification of Shem and Melchizedek is the fact that the blessing of Shem in Gen 9:26 has distinct parallels with the blessing which Melchizedek gives to Abraham.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Gen 9:26
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Horton
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Shem Traditions
The identification of Melchizedek as Shem appears in the Targums.
“We can find the origins of the tradition from a very early time; identifying Melchizedek as Shem can be found in the Targums, 22 Aramaic renderings of the Hebrew Bible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Targums
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
The Melchizedek material of 2 Enoch was probably composed in a community that respected Jewish lore, including the view that Enoch's ancestors preceded Melchizedek.
“Fifth, the Melchizedek material of 2 Enoch was probably composed in a community which respected the authority of the Jewish lore (the opinion about Enoch's ancestors as predecessors of Melchizedek).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Pirke R. El. contains two references to Melchizedek-Shem.
“Pirke R. El. has two references to Melchizedek-Shem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pirke R. El.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sethian Traditions Schlomo Pines' reference to sacrificial practices of "minim," heretics, which were usually represented in the Jewish orthodox mindset as Jewish Gnostics, 51 necessitated further examination of the relationship between the Melchizedek story of 2 Enoch and some Gnostic traditions.One of the tractates of the Nag Hammadi corpus, Melchizedek (further Melch.)deserves special attention because it contains materials that echo certain motifs in 2 Enoch's story.52 The text has a form of revelations given by heavenly intermediaries to Melchizedek who communicates the revelations to a privileged few, "the congregation (e)kklhsi&a) of [the] [children] of Seth (5:19-20)."53 According to scholars, Melch.has important similar features with traditions associated with Sethian gnosticism.54 It is possible that the author of the tractate reworked some earlier Judaic Melchizedek's traditions into gnostic Christian settings.55 In spite of the fragmentary character of the tractate, there are a number of important details which can be connected with Melchizedek's story in 2 Enoch.Two features of the Gnostic text are especially valuable.First, the author's use of the phrase "the children of Seth" (5:20), and second, his usage of the phrase "the [race] (ge&nov) of the High priest (a)rxiereu&v) (6:17)."56 These details seem to have certain parallels with Melchizedek's narrative of 2 Enoch, which contains materials about priestly functions of Seth.In chapter 72 of the shorter recension of 2 Enoch, the following statement comes from the lips of the Lord: "... and Melchizedek will be the head of the priests in another generation as was Seth in this generation."57 The author's familiarity with the traditions which exalted Seth, however, become evident much earlier in chapter 33:10 where the Lord promises to give Enoch an intercessor archangel Michael and guardian angels Ariokh and Mariokh on account of his handwritings and the handwritings of his fathers-Adam and Seth.58 Mentioning all three traditions together shows that Sethian tradition has in the eyes of 2 Enoch's author equal value to the tradition of Adam and Enoch. Melch. also gives an interesting list which includes Adam, Enoch, and Melchizedek.59 Birger Pearson suggests that "the list of biblical figures mentioned in this passage, culminating with Melchizedek, may be intended as a list of those heroes of the past who functioned as priests."60 Another important testimony to Sethian tradition is found in chapter 71 where the author of 2 Enoch depicts a priestly line which begins with Seth: "Therefore honor him (Melchizedek) together with your servants and great priests, with Seth, and with Enoch, and Maleleil, and Aamilam, and Phrasidam, and with Maleleil, and with Rusif and with Enoch and with your servant Nir...." 61 These testimonies to Sethian tradition show that there are obvious similarities between Melch.and 2 Enoch.Both stories emphasize priestly functions of Seth in their connections with priestly functions of Melchizedek.It is noteworthy that this emphasis on priestly role of Seth is a rare motif in Sethian traditions.In the variety of Sethian traditions, Seth is often pictured as an astrologer, a scribe, or the head of a generation, but he is rarely viewed as a priest.62 From the other side, despite these parallels, 63 there is a fundamental divergence between Melch.and 2 Enoch.The purpose of the author of Melch. is apparent-to place Melchizedek in the context of Sethian priestly authority.In observations on the tractate, B. Pearson stresses that because of the reference to the "children of Seth" (5:20), and the parallel reference to the "race of the high priest" (i.e.Melch.6:17), it is possible that in Melch., the priest-savior Melchizedek is regarded as an earthly incarnation of the heavenly Seth.64 On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
2 Enoch attempts to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.
“On the contrary, in 2 Enoch, however, there is an established attempt to challenge the Sethian priestly line and replace it with a new postdiluvian priestly authority of Melchizedek.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
The Melchizedek portion's liturgical and exegetical features have similarities to Qumran ideology, such as an alternative priestly line and exegesis of Noah and Melchizedek.
“Seventh, liturgical (priesthood line) and exegetical (Noah, Melchizedek) features of the Melchizedek portion of 2 Enoch have certain similarities to the ideology of the Qumran community (an alternative priestly line, exegesis of Noah, and Melchizedek's story).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
The second Pirke R. El. reference says Abraham gave a tithe to Shem, Noah's son.
“Rabbi Joshua said: Abraham was the first to begin to give a tithe.He took all the tithe of the kings and all the tithe of the wealth of Lot, the son of his brother, and gave (it) to Shem, the Son of Noah, as it is said, 'And he gave him a tenth of all.'”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pirke R. El.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
It is possible that 2 Enoch displays a specific attitude toward the priestly authority connected with the Jerusalem Temple.
“Fourth, it is possible that in the text we can see a specific attitude toward the priestly authority (hierocracy) connected with the Temple in Jerusalem.65”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Achuzan is a specific name for the hill of the Temple in Jerusalem.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The ideological and theological setting of 2 Enoch cannot be explained only by Qumran materials, because major Judaic symbols and themes central to Qumran ideology are absent.
“It is evident, however, that the ideological and theological settings of the document cannot be explained solely by referring to the Qumran materials because of an absence of major Judaic symbols and themes which occupied a central place in the ideology of the Qumranites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
- Premisecitation§ Conclusion
Two additional rabbinic sources that attest Melchizedek as Shem are Pirke R. El. and Gen. Rab.
“Two other rabbinic evidences that attest Melchizedek as Shem include Pirke R. El. and Gen. Rab.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pirke R. El.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gen. Rab.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion
The replacement of the official Noah-Shem line with the Nir-Melchizedek line may be the main reason for a legitimate background for new sectarian priestly authority.
“This may also be the main reason for the replacement of official priestly line Noah-Shem to the line Nir-Melchizedek, as a legitimate background for the new sectarian priestly authority.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Achuzan is a specific name for the hill of the Temple in Jerusalem.
- Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
The Melchizedek story is used in 2 Enoch, as in many other traditions, as a theological tool to legitimize an alternative priestly authority.
“Third, the story of Melchizedek, this sacerdos in aeternum, is used in 2 Enoch as well as in many other traditions as the theological tool of legitimization of alternative priestly authority (line).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion
The community of 2 Enoch apparently rejected the sacrificial customs of traditional Judaism in Jerusalem, including the tying together of all four animal legs.
“Sixth, the community of 2 Enoch apparently repudiated the sacrificial customs prevailing in traditional Judaism (Jerusalem) (the tying together of all the four legs of the animals during the sacrifices).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 47
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Shem TraditionsIn chapter 69 the Lord appeared to Methuselah in a night vision and made him priest before the people.
“In chapter 69 the Lord appeared to Methuselah in a night vision and appointed him as the priest before the people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The Melchizedek narrative is placed in the final chapters of 2 Enoch.
“The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Sothonim, Nir's wife, bore a child in old age on the day she died.
“Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child “in her old age,” 9 right “on the day of her death.”10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.When Nir called Sothonim at birth, he saw she was pregnant, wished to send her away, and she died at his feet.
“She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingreasoning§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Sothonim concealed herself throughout her pregnancy.
“Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingcitation§ Noachic TraditionsIn 2 Enoch, Sothonim did not explain the conception and told Nir she did not know how her womb had conceived.
“On the other hand, in 2 Enoch Sothonim did not explain the circumstances of the conception.She answered Nir: “O my lord!Behold, it is the time of my old age, and there was not in me any (ardor of) youth and I do not know how the indecency of my womb has been conceived.”38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Nir and Noah clothed the child in priestly garments and gave him holy bread.
“Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Melchizedek was born from Sothonim's dead body.
“Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The newborn Melchizedek had the priestly badge on his chest and a glorious appearance.
“the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how “the badge of priesthood” 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Shem TraditionsChapter 70 tells of Methuselah's final days and the Lord's command to transfer the priesthood to Nir, Lamech's second son.
“Chapter 70 reveals the last days of Methuselah on the earth before his death.The Lord again appeared to Methuselah in a night vision and commanded him to pass his priesthood duties on to the second son of his son Lamech-Nir.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Nir had abstained from Sothonim from the time the Lord appointed him before the people.
“Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Nir and Noah found the child beside Sothonim's corpse, clothed, and were frightened because he appeared fully formed.
“When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with “his clothing on him.”According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The Lord ordered Gabriel to take the child to paradise Eden so that he would become high priest after the Flood.
“Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in “the paradise Eden” so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Shem TraditionsThis portrayal of Melchizedek as continuing Enoch's priestly line has parallels in rabbinic literature.
“This understanding of Melchizedek as the continuation of the priestly line of descendants of Enoch has interesting parallels in rabbinic literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingcitation§ Another important point in identification of Shem andBoth traditions build up the priestly antecedents of Melchizedek.
“The main point of the passage from b. Ned. as well as from Gen. Rab. and Pirke R. El. is the building up of the priestly antecedents of Melchizedek (Shem) in the context of the transmission of this priestly line to Abraham.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites b. Ned.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gen. Rab.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Pirke R. El.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ Another important point in identification of Shem andBoth 2 Enoch and targumic/rabbinic sources place Melchizedek's genealogy among Enoch's descendants and give the Genesis figure a pre-Deluge historical setting.
“2 Enoch as well as targumic and rabbinic sources tried to put the genealogy of Melchizedek into the Semitic context of Enoch's descendants.They endeavored to give this abstract and ahistorical character of Genesis a certain historical location and place him in the context of the pre-Deluge generation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Nir and Noah hid the child because they feared the people would kill him.
“They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The Melchizedek story concerns the household of Nir, a priest described as Lamekh's second son and Noah's brother.
“The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as “second son of Lamekh” 7 and the brother of Noah.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone given§ Another important point in identification of Shem andThere are several important similarities between targumic and rabbinic material and the Melchizedek portion of 2 Enoch.
“It is interesting to note several important similarities between targumic and rabbinic material and Melchizedek's portion of 2 Enoch.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The newborn child spoke and blessed the Lord.
“The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Noachic TraditionsThe relationship of Lamech and Bathenosh in the Apocryphon closely resembles that of Nir and Sophonim.
“The story of the relationship between Lamech and Bathenosh found in the Apocryphon is very similar to the story of the relationships between Nir and Sophonim.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingcitation§ Shem TraditionsMethuselah put priestly vestments on Nir before all the people and set him at the head of the altar.
“Methuselah invested Nir with the vestments of priesthood in front of the face of all the people and “made him stand at the head of altar. ” 19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Shem TraditionsThe Melchizedek narrative is tied to Noah, Methuselah, and Lamech.
“The Melchizedek narrative in the book is connected with the name of Noah, the legendary pre-deluge patriarch.We can not only find Noah in the book but also his grandfather, Methuselah 17 and his father, Lamech.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingown data§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.Sothonim conceived while barren and without sexual relations with her husband.
“She conceived the child, “being sterile” and “without having slept with her husband.”11”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Exposition The Melchizedek narrative occupies the last chapters of the book.The content of the story is connected with the family of Nir, 6 the priest, who is pictured in the book as "second son of Lamekh" 7 and the brother of Noah.Sothonim8 the wife of Nir, gave birth to a child "in her old age," 9 right "on the day of her death."10 She conceived the child, "being sterile" and "without having slept with her husband."11 The book narrates that Nir the priest had not slept with her from the day that the Lord had appointed him in front of the face of the people.Therefore, Sothonim hid herself during all the days of her pregnancy.12 Finally, when she was at the day of birth, Nir remembered his wife and called her to himself in the temple.She came to him and he saw that she was pregnant.Nir, filled with shame, wanted to cast her from him, but she died at his feet.Melchizedek 13 was born from Sothonim's corpse.When Nir and Noah came in to bury Sothonim, they saw the child sitting beside the corpse with "his clothing on him."According to the story they were terrified because the child was fully developed physically.The child spoke with his lips and he blessed the Lord.It is of great significance that the newborn child was marked by the sign of priesthood.The story describes how "the badge of priesthood" 14 was on his chest, and it was glorious in appearance.Nir and Noah dressed the child in the garments of priesthood and they fed him the holy bread.They decided to hide him, fearing that the people would have him put to death.Finally, the Lord commanded His archangel Gabriel 15 to take the child and place him 16 in "the paradise Eden" so that he might become the high priest after the Flood.Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.The short recension ends by describing Melchizedek's ascent on Gabriel's wings to paradise Eden.
“Final passages of the short recension describe the ascent of Melchizedek on the wings of Gabriel to the paradise Eden.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Shem TraditionsThe midrashim about Enoch's descendants occupy chapters 68 through 73.
“The midrashim of these descendants of Enoch occupy chapters 68-73 of the text.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingnone given§ Shem TraditionsThe text gives no reason why the Lord gave the priesthood to Nir rather than to Noah, Lamech's firstborn.
“The text does not explain why the Lord wanted to pass on the priesthood to Nir instead of Noah -Lamech's firstborn son.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingcitation§ Shem TraditionsAfter Enoch's ascent, Methuselah and the sons of Enoch built an altar at Achuzan, the place from which Enoch was taken up.
“Right after Enoch's ascension to the highest heaven, the firstborn son of Enoch, Methuselah, and his brothers, “the sons of Enoch,” constructed an altar at Achuzan, 18 the place where Enoch had been taken up (ch.68).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Findingcitation§ ReferencesThe text names Achuzan, the center of the world where Adam was created, as the place of Melchizedek's future priestly vocation.
“It is interesting to note that the text specifies the place of the future priestly vocation of Melchizedek-”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaillant
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data§ ConclusionAt the conclusion of 2 Enoch, Nir states that the race will end in confusion and all will perish except Noah, who will be preserved for procreation.
“At the very end of 2 Enoch, Nir says:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Theology Department, Marquette University Milwaukee, WIThe Melchizedek legend belongs to 2 Enoch and is not a later insertion.
“A. Vaillant successfully demonstrates that Melchizedek's legend is an integral part of 2 Enoch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vaillant
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Andersen
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Theology Department, Marquette University Milwaukee, WIThere is no evidence that the second part of 2 Enoch ever circulated separately.
“there is no evidence that the second part ever existed separately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andersen
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Theology Department, Marquette University Milwaukee, WIThe Melchizedek tradition occurs in both recensions of 2 Enoch, across six manuscripts from four text families.
“His new collation of manuscripts shows that the Melchizedek tradition is found in both recensions, in six manuscripts which represent four text families.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Andersen
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Noachic TraditionsSome scholars see parallels between Melchizedek's story in Slavonic Enoch and Noah's birth in the Genesis Apocryphon.
“According to some scholars, Melchizedek's story in Slavonic Enoch recalls some parallels with the birth of Noah 33 in the Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran.34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites some scholars
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Shem TraditionsBiblical chronology makes it possible for Shem, identified as Melchizedek, to have met Abraham after the kings' defeat, and Shem outlived Abraham by 35 years.
“Therefore Shem in fact outlived Abraham by 35 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gen 14:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gen 11:10-26
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gen 25:7
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Noachic TraditionsKvanvig shows that Noah and Enoch often appear in the same roles in Noachic traditions.
“Kvanvig shows that in Noachic traditions Noah and Enoch often appear in the same roles.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kvanvig
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Noachic TraditionsPines suggests the four-leg binding may have been an accepted rite of a sect rejecting Jerusalem's sacrificial customs, possibly the Essenes.
“In his final conclusion, Pines suggests that “it may have been an accepted rite of a sect, which repudiated the sacrificial customs prevailing in Jerusalem.It might be conjectured that this sect might have been the Essenes, whose sacrificial usage differed according to the one reading of the passage of Josephus 49 from those practiced at the Temple.”50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Josephus
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThe preservation of Melchizedek as protection against the world's unrighteousness shows a parallel to the Qumranic phrase 'paradise of righteousness.'
“The preservation of Melchizedek as protection against the unrighteousness of the world reveals an interesting parallel to the Qumranic term )+#q sdrp-”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ ReferencesIn Slavonic Enoch, Melchizedek has three manifestations: miraculous birth before the Flood, service as a great priest after the Flood, and priestly function in the end-time.
“Pearson rightly observes that in Slavonic Enoch Melchizedek”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pearson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionThe phonetic pattern of Sothonim can be traced to the Hebrew word Mynwpc, meaning hidden or mysteries.
“He mentioned that the phonetic pattern of the name could be traced to the Hebrew word Mynwpc, hidden or mysteries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wacholder
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionJastrow's dictionary defines the root ryn as 'to break ground' or 'to clear.'
“M. Jastrow in his dictionary defines ryn as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites M. Jastrow
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Gen. Rab.Gen. Rab. interprets Abram's fear after meeting Melchizedek as fear of Shem.
“Gen. Rab. gives a very interesting interpretation to the fear of Abram after his meeting with Melchizedek.It says:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gen. Rab.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionThis community may have had liturgical and theological differences, sectarian biases, from mainstream Second Temple Judaism.
“This community might have had certain liturgical and theological differences (sectarian biases) from the mainstream of Second Temple Judaism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationcitation§ ConclusionThe hypothesis that Sothonim's name derives from the Hebrew word for hidden or mysteries is supported by her hiding from Nir during pregnancy.
“The hypothesis is supported by the fact that Sothonim hid herself from Nir during days of her pregnancy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wacholder
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ ReferencesBoth 2 Enoch and Melchizedek (Nag Hammadi) belong to the apocalyptic genre.
“According to Pearson, another parallel between 2 Enoch and Melch. is that both texts belong to the genre”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pearson
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThe material reflects complex polemics with various traditions of priestly practice and succession within Judaism.
“Second, the material reflects complicated polemics with various traditions of priestly practice and the priestly succession inside Judaism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionJastrow notes that ryn can sometimes mean 'new broken land.'
“According to Jastrow it can mean”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites M. Jastrow
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ ConclusionThe Melchizedek portion shows interest in priestly practice, succession, and authority, which are important in 2 Enoch's eschatology.
“First, the Melchizedek portion demonstrates the interest in the issues of priestly practice, succession and authority, which occupy an important part in the eschatology of 2 Enoch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ ReferencesAnother parallel motif in Noachic traditions is Noah's birth in 1 Enoch 106, where Noah appears as a wondrous child.
“Another similar motif in the Noachic traditions is the story of Noah's birth in 1 Enoch 106, who appears also as a marvellous child.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites 1 Enoch 106
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionThe first Pirke R. El. reference says Noah handed the tradition to Shem, who was initiated in intercalation, intercalated years, and was called a priest.
“The text says that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pirke R. El.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone given§ ReferencesThe replacement of Noah by Nir may be seen as a polemic against Noachic tradition.
“This substitution of Nir for Noah could be also viewed as a polemic with Noachic tradition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ ReferencesTargum Onqelos is the only targum that also displays a negative attitude toward Enoch.
“The interesting fact here is that Tg. Onq. is the only targum which also shows a negative attitude toward Enoch:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tg. Onq.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationcitation§ ReferencesThe Gen. Rab. passage indicates that Melchizedek was Shem and that the four Elamite kings were Shem's sons.
“This passage shows that not only was Melchizedek Shem, but the four kings of the Elamite opposition were sons of Shem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gen. Rab.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ ReferencesOnly Targum Onqelos omits Shem in connection with Melchizedek.
“Only the Tg. Onq. does not mention Shem in connection with Melchizedek.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tg. Onq.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationcitation§ ConclusionThe name Nir can be connected with the meaning 'clearing, breaking ground or earth.'
“In my opinion, one more possible explanation of the name Nir can be suggested.This interpretation can be connected with the meaning of Nir as”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites M. Jastrow
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ ConclusionNir witnessed the future 'clearing, breaking down' of the earth, so his name may reflect that coming situation.
“Nir is indeed the man who beheld the future”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Achuzan is a specific name for the hill of the Temple in Jerusalem.
“It is important to stress that the term Achuzan here is a specific name for the hill of the Temple in Jerusalem.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Melchizedek narrative in 2 Enoch can be used to reconstruct the theological concerns of a community behind the text.
“These conclusions focus on the problem of the hypothetical community behind the Melchizedek narrative.”
Citations
Cites
Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism
Albright, W. F., & Scholem, G. G. (1944) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3262553 · Cited by 355
Ascent to Heaven in Jewish and Christian Apocalypses
Himmelfarb, M. (1993) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195082036.001.0001 · Cited by 317
The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition
Tigchelaar, & Martínez, F. G. (2000) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004531420 · Cited by 211
Jewish literature between the Bible and the Mishnah
Nickelsburg, G. W. E. (1981) · Cited by 152
GNOSTICISM, JUDAISM, AND EGYPTIAN CHRISTIANITY
Pearson, B. A. (1990) · Cited by 109
The Jewish Temple at Leontopolis: A Reconsideration
Hayward, R. (1982) · Journal of Jewish Studies · doi:10.18647/1059/jjs-1982 · Cited by 107
Roots of Apocalyptic: The Mesopotamian Background of the Enoch Figure and of the Son of Man
Collins, J. J., & Kvanvig, H. S. (1990) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3267384 · Cited by 67
A study of the interpretation of Noah and the flood in Jewish and Christian literature
Lewis, J. P. (1968) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3263561 · Cited by 62
The Figure of Seth in Gnostic Literature
Pearson, B. A. (1980) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004378599_029 · Cited by 44
Qumran and Apocalyptic: Studies on the Aramaic Texts from Qumran
Martínez, F. G. (1992) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004350106 · Cited by 39
Pearson, B. A. (1975) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004378490_022 · Cited by 36
Further Light on Melchizedek from Qumran Cave 11
Fitzmyer, J. A. (1967) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3263241 · Cited by 34
Utnapishtim in the Book of Giants?
Reeves, J. C. (1993) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3267870 · Cited by 27
11Q Melchizedek and the New Testament
de Jonge, M., & van der Woude, A. S. (1966) · New Testament Studies · doi:10.1017/s0028688500018117 · Cited by 25
(1981) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004438873 · Cited by 9
ABRAM AND MELCHIZEDEK (Gen 14 18-20)
Smith, R. H. (1965) · Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft · doi:10.1515/zatw.1965.77.2.129 · Cited by 7
Melchizedek from Genesis to The Qumran Texts and The Epistle to the Hebrews
Delcor, M., & Caquot, M. A. (1979) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004663237_026 · Cited by 7
Report on Seth Traditions in the Armenian Adam Books
Stone, M. E. (1980) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004378599_028 · Cited by 5
Eschatologie und Jenseitserwartung im hellenistischen Diasporajudentum
Harrington, D. J., & Fischer, U. (1980) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/3265824 · Cited by 4
Philo on Seth: Was Philo Aware of Traditions Which Exalted Seth and His Progeny?
Kraft, R. (1980) · doi:10.1163/9789004378599_027 · Cited by 3
Eschatology and the concept of time in the Slavonic book of Enoch
Pines, S. (1970) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004378094_010 · Cited by 2
The SNTS Pseudepigrapha Seminars at Tübingen and Paris on the Books of Enoch
Charlesworth, J. H. (1979) · New Testament Studies · doi:10.1017/s002868850000494x
God's Angel of Truth and Melchizedek
Laubscher, F. D. T. (1972) · Journal for the Study of Judaism · doi:10.1163/157006372x00252
Melchisédech dans la polémique entre juifs et chrétiens et dans la légende
Simon, M. (1937) · Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses · doi:10.3406/rhpr.1937.2990
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- [6]6. R. H. Charles, and W. R. Morfill, The Book of the Secrets of Enoch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1896);
- [8]8. J. H. Charlesworth, The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the New Testament. Prolegomena for the Study of Christian Origins (SNTSMS, 54; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985);
- [20]20. F. Horton, The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews (SNTSMS, 30; Cambridge/London/New York/Melbourne: Cambridge University, 1976);
- [30]30. G. Vajda, for slaying his sons. And the latter (Shem) feared the former, thinking, Perhaps he nurses resentment against me for begetting wicked offspring." Midrash Rabbah (10 vols.; London: Soncino Press, 1961), 1.365. This passage shows that not only was Melchizedek Shem, but the four kings of the Elamite opposition were sons of Shem. 22 Only the Tg. Onq. does not mention Shem in connection with Melchizedek. The interesting fact here is that Tg. Onq. is the only targum which also shows a negative attitude toward Enoch: "and Enoch walked in reverence of the Lord, then he was no more, for the Lord has caused him to die (Gen. 5,24)." B. Grossfeld (tr.), The Targum Onkelos to Genesis (Aramaic Bible, 6;
- [32]32. M. McNamara (tr.), Targum Neofiti 1: Genesis (AB, 1A; Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 1992), 92.
- [33]33. M. Maher (tr.), Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Genesis (AB, 1B; Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 1992), 58. 25 Horton, 117.
- [39]39. J. VanderKam, "The Righteousness of Noah," Ideal Figures in Ancient Judaism: Profiles and Paradigms (eds. J. J. Collins and G. W. E. Nickelsburg; SBLSCS, 12; Chico: Scholars Press, 1980), 13-23;
- [40]40. J. VanderKam, The Birth of Noah," Intertestamental Essays in Honor of Josef Tadeusz Milik (ed. Z. J. Kapera; Qumranica Mogilanensia, 6; Krakow: The Enigma Press, 1992), 213-31.
- [42]42. Another similar motif in the Noachic traditions is the story of Noah's birth in 1 Enoch 106, who appears also as a marvellous child. The story in 1 Enoch 106-7 says: "And after (some) days my son Methuselah took for his son Lamech a wife, and she became pregnant by him and bore a son. And his body was white like snow and red like the flower of a rose, and the hair of his head (was) white like wool...and his eyes (were) beautiful; and when he opened his eyes, he made the whole house bright like the sun so that the whole house was exceptionally bright. And when he was taken from the hand of the midwife, he opened his mouth and spoke to the Lord of Righteousness. And his father Lamech was afraid of him and fled and went to his father Methuselah. And he said to him: 'I have begotten a strange son; he is not like a man, but is like the children of the angels of heaven, of a different type, and not like us. And his eyes (are) like the rays of the sun, and his face glorious. And it seems to me that he is not sprung from me, but from angels.'" M. Knibb, The Ethiopic Book of Enoch (2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978) 2,244-45.
- [46]46. F. García Martínez and E. J. C. Tigchelaar (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, 1.29.
- [47]47. F. García Martínez and E. J. C. Tigchelaar (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, 1.29-31. 38 Andersen, "2 Enoch," 205.
- [49]49. F. García Martínez and E. J. C. Tigchelaar (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, 1.31.
- [50]50. F. García Martínez and E. J. C. Tigchelaar (eds.), The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, 1.31.
- [56]56. The issue of possible connections between the Nag Hammadi texts and the Enochic tradition can be clarified by reference to some patristic materials. As we know, the place of discovery of the Nag Hammadi library was close to the former site of the Pachomian monastery at Chenoboskion. The following condemnation of the "apocryphal books" was made by patriarch Athanasius and recorded in the Pachomian Lives: "Who has made the simple folk believe that these books belong to Enoch even though no scriptures existed before Moses?" Cit. in D. Brakke, Athanasius and the Politics of Ascetism (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995), 330.
- [58]58. Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 36. 55 Pearson stresses the fact that Jewish apocalyptic elements are prominent in Melch. He argues that "it might be suggested that Melch. is a Jewish-Christian product containing an originally pre-Christian Melchizedek speculation overlaid with Christian christological re- interpretation." Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 34.
- [59]59. Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 53. 57
- [61]61. Slavjanskaja Kniga Enoha Pravednogo. Teksty, latinskij perevod i izsledovanie. Posmertnyj trud avtora prigotovil k izdaniju M. Speranskij," Chtenija v Obshchestve Istorii i Drevnostej Rossijskih (COIDR) 4 (1910), 106 and 155. 58 Andersen, 157.
- [62]62. "...of Adam [Abel], Enoch, [Noah] you, Melchizedek, [the Priest] of God [Most High] (12:7-11)." Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 63.
- [63]63. Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 25. Pearson supports his hypothesis by referring to the list of priests in the Hellenistic-Jewish synagogue prayer quoted in Const. Ap. VIII.5.3, which includes Abel, Seth, Enos, Enoch, Noah, and Melchizedek. 61 Manuscript
- [64]64. Cf. M. I. Sokolov, "Materialy i zametki po starinnoj slavjanskoj literature. Vypusk tretij, VII. Slavjanskaja Kniga Enoha Pravednogo. Teksty, latinskij perevod i izsledovanie. Posmertnyj trud avtora prigotovil k izdaniju M. Speranskij," COIDR 4 (1910), 106.
- [70]70. Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 30. Pearson also notes that in Melch. Melchizedek appears in several roles: "as ancient priest and recipient of heavenly revelations of the eschatological future, and as eschatological savior-priest identified with Jesus Christ." Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 20. According to Pearson, another parallel between 2 Enoch and Melch. is that both texts belong to the genre "apocalypse." Pearson notes that Melch. "satisfies the generic requirements of an apocalypse: it is pseudonymous, attributed to a biblical hero of the past, and contains purported prophecies of future events given by an angelic informant, as well as secrets pertaining to the heavenly world, presumably in a visionary experience." Birger A. Pearson (ed.), Nag Hammadi Codices IX and X, 20.
- [71]71. B. Pearson, "The Figure of Seth in Gnostic Literature," The Rediscovery of Gnosticism, 498. 65 The question of the relationship between 2 Enoch and the temple in Leontopolis remains open. A possible Alexandrian provenance of Slavonic Enoch could give additional support to this hypothesis. Cf.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The glory of the Son of Man in Revelation 1-3. Reflections on mysticism in the New Testament
Villiers, P. G. R. D. (2009) · Acta Theologica · doi:10.4314/actat.v29i1.44168 · Cited by 10
“The motif denotes “sanctity, divinity, or transcendence, often in theophanies or angelophanies” (Aune 1997:99); cf. also Orlov (2000a) for a discussion of this from a mystical per spective.”
BackgroundTHE HEIRS OF THE ENOCHIC LORE: «MEN OF FAITH» IN 2 ENOCH 35:2 AND SEFER HEKHALOT 48D:10
Orlov, A. A. (2007) · Scrinium · doi:10.1163/18177565-90000168
Self-citationFalbel, N. (2011) · Revista de História · doi:10.11606/issn.2316-9141.v0i165p333-366
Skowronek, M., & Gucio, K. (2014) · Studia Ceranea Journal of the Waldemar Ceran Research Centre for the History and Culture of the Mediterranean Area and South-East Europe · doi:10.18778/2084-140x.04.11
An Early Reader of James? Ethical Parallels between the Epistle and 2 Enoch
Gabrielson, T. A. (2020) · Journal for the Study of the New Testament · doi:10.1177/0142064x20961280
Somov, A. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of St Philaret s Institute · doi:10.25803/sfi.2020.36.4.009
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlov, A.
- Affiliations
- Marquette University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Orlov, Andrei
- ORCID
- Orlov, Andrei
- Venue
- Journal for the Study of Judaism
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 23-38
- ISSN
- 0047-2212 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-0631
- OpenAlex
- W2031514974
- Semantic Scholar
- c36779b302d6a8f69c6b87103db000a0a86d3525
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal for the Study of Judaism (publishedVersion)
- e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Keywords
- 2 Enoch, Melchizedek, Enochic literature, textual origins, interpolation, manuscript recensions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-03, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-03 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review