Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Biblical Studies and InterpretationReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, ChristianityClassical Antiquity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Origins of Oral Torah: A New Pauline Perspective

Open access
Fisch, Yael·2020·Journal for the Study of Judaism
DOI 10.1163/15700631-12511265
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Abstract This article proposes to rethink the genealogy and origin of the rabbinical terms Oral Torah and Written Torah. The terms appear for the first time in Tannaitic literature, yet scholars have attempted to ascribe to them an earlier date and to present them as a Second Temple, specifically Pharisaic, distinction. This article problematizes the existing genealogies and considers neglected evidence found in Paul’s Letter to the Romans that advances our understanding of the Oral Torah/Written Torah distinction in the first century CE. According to my rereading of Rom 10:5-13 and 3:19-31, Paul has a notion of double-nomos within scripture, and his twofold torah is presented as oral and written. Apart from rabbinic literature, it is only in Paul that we find the use of an Oral Torah/Written Torah distinction. This evidence affects both how the history of the rabbinic terms is understood and how Paul is configured in his Jewish matrix.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15700631-12511265

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Fisch Journal for the Study of Judaism 51 (2020) 43-66 Bibliography
  2. Baumgarten, Albert. "The Pharisaic Paradosis." Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987), 63-77.
  3. Calabi, Francesca. The Language and the Law of God: Interpretation and Politics in Philo of Alexandria (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1998).
  4. Dewey, Arthur J. "A Re-Hearing of Romans 10:1-15." Semeia 65 (1994), 109-27.
  5. Fraade, Steven D. Legal Fictions: Studies of Law and Narrative in the Discursive Worlds of Ancient Jewish Sectarians and Sages (Leiden: Brill, 2011). Journal for the Study of Judaism 51 (2020) 43-66
  6. Benjamin D. Sommer (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 31-46.
  7. Fredriksen, Paula. Paul: The Pagans' Apostle (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017).
  8. Friedrich, Gerhard. "Das Gesetz des Glaubens Röm. 3, 27." Theologische Zeitschrift 10 (1954), 401-16.
  9. Gaston, Lloyd. Paul and the Torah (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 1987).
  10. Heil, John Paul. "Christ, the Termination of the Law (Romans 9:30-10:8)." The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 63 (2001), 484-98.
  11. Henshke, David. "Studies in the Method of Two Verses Which Contradict Each Other.'" Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish Studies 11, no. 1 (1993), 39-46 [Hebrew].
  12. Henshke, David. "The Rabbis' Approach to Biblical Self-Contradictions." Sidra 10 (1994), 39-55 [Hebrew].
  13. Käsemann, Ernst. Commentary on Romans (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994). Fisch Journal for the Study of Judaism 51 (2020) 43-66
  14. Milgrom, Jacob. "Qumran's Biblical Hermeneutics: The Case of the Wood Offering." Revue de Qumrân 16/63 (1994), 449-56.
  15. Phillips, Thomas A. Paul, His Letters, and Acts (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2009).
  16. Räisänen, Heikki. "Paul's Word-Play on Nomos: A Linguistic Study." In Jesus, Paul and Torah: Collected Essays (Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1992), 69-94.
  17. Rosental, Abraham. "Torah She'Bapeh ve Torah Me'Sinai-Halakhah u'Ma'asaeh." Mehqerei Talmud 2 (1993), 448-89.
  18. Sagiv, Yonatan. Studies in Early Rabbinic Hermeneutics as Reflected in Selected Chapters in the Sifra, Dissertation (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2009).
  19. Schiffman, Lawrence H. "The Deuteronomic Paraphrase of the 'Temple Scroll.'" Revue de Qumrân 15/60 (1992), 543-67.
  20. Sussman, Ya'aqov. "'Oral Torah' in Its Literal Sense." Talmudic Studies 3 (2005), 209-384.
  21. Weinfeld, M. "God Versus Moses in the Temple Scroll." Revue de Qumrân 15/57-58 (1991), 175-80.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fisch, Y.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Fisch, Yael
Venue
Journal for the Study of Judaism
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2020-03-19
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
43-66
ISSN
  • 0047-2212 (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-0631
DOI
10.1163/15700631-12511265
OpenAlex
W3014503916
Cited by
5
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Journal for the Study of Judaism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Oral Torah, Pauline theology, Epistle to the Romans, Tannaim, Pharisees, Second Temple Judaism, nomos, Paul and Judaism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.