The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch
Open accessAbstract
This essay is concerned with the meaning of torah and its relationship with wisdom in late Second Temple Judaism. It has been previously argued that, as the Mosaic torah had gained dominance, the wisdom school absorbed and accommodated the Mosaic torah tradition, and yet maintained all the essential elements of the sapiential tradition. Through a study of two Jewish apocalypses, 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, the essay discovers not only the sapientialization of the Mosaic torah, but also the total submission of the wisdom tradition under the authority of the Mosaic torah tradition to gain legitimacy. It argues that this is done through a submission of sapiential revelations to the Mosaic revelation received at Sinai, and a portrayal of wisdom recipients and apocalyptic visionaries as types of Moses. This process reflects religious innovation under the disguise of compliance with established, older traditions.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This essay argues that in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch the Mosaic torah is sapientialized—spoken of as wisdom and interpreted through sapiential vocabulary—while the wisdom tradition is simultaneously subordinated to Mosaic authority. The two apocalypses achieve this by portraying Ezra and Baruch as types of Moses and by grafting their revelations into Sinai/Deuteronomic tradition.
Key findings
- Both apocalypses equate torah with wisdom and express torah obedience in sapiential terms rather than through specific halakhic rulings; torah is called “the way(s) of the Most High” in 4 Ezra and is developed through the “torah is light” metaphor in 2 Baruch.
- The paper counts words for torah (Latin *lex*, Syriac *namusa*) appearing twenty-eight times in 4 Ezra and forty-two times in 2 Baruch, showing the authors’ concern for torah obedience.
- 4 Ezra aligns Ezra’s esoteric revelations with Moses: Ezra is called like Moses from a bush, kept forty days, and receives ninety-four books—twenty-four for all and seventy esoteric books for the wise—so that new wisdom is presented as previously concealed Mosaic revelation.
- 2 Baruch presents Baruch as a second Moses/teacher of Israel; its Deuteronomic scheme of sin, punishment, repentance, and renewal is extended eschatologically, with the “bright and dark waters” vision covering twelve periods and ending in messianic restoration and the age to come.
Methods
- The study is a literary and comparative analysis of two Jewish apocalypses, 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, written around the end of the first century CE as responses to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in 70 CE.
- It examines torah terminology, sapiential vocabulary, Moses typology, and claims about revelation in both works, with background comparison to Hebrew Bible and Apocrypha texts such as Deuteronomy, Proverbs, Sirach, 1 Baruch, and Psalm 119.
- The analysis is qualitative and text-based; no empirical sample or statistical method is used.
Limitations
- The paper states that 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch did not represent all streams of Second Temple Judaism and do not provide evidence for how the process of integrating torah and wisdom took place, though they witness the importance of writing and scriptures.
- Evident from the article’s scope: the argument rests on two apocalypses, so its conclusions are not a comprehensive survey of Second Temple Judaism or of all wisdom/apocalyptic literature.
- Evident from the article’s method: the analysis depends on close readings and translations of 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, including Syriac terminology, and on interpretive judgments about literary allusions and typology.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
76 Own interpretation · 39 No basis given · 16 Sources not found · 3 Not checked yet · 2 Own result
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The instruction (tôrâ) is not only given in the aural mode through dialogues with the angel Uriel—a wisdom teacher type of figure—but also in the visual mode in apocalyptic visions: the heavenly Jerusalem (10:25-59), a messianic figure in the image of a lion defeating the enemy in the image of an eagle (12:1-34), and a son of man figure reproving the nations and restoring the tribes of Israel (13:”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Those who die are not dead, but are simply preserved to be raised in the last times (27:14; 30:2; 42:8; 50:2).”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“however, the life in this world promised in Deuteronomy is interpreted as eternal life in the age to come in 2 Baruch.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For 4 Ezra, even the infinite esoteric wisdom (represented by the seventy books) is turned into written torah in order to acquire its divinely derived authority, through Ezra the scribe of the Most High and his five assistant scribes, to be read and understood only by the “wise”;”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch did not represent all streams of Second Temple Judaism.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Real reward for those who obey the torah, therefore, is in the age to come.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The review of history presented as a vision is precisely the Deuteronomic history.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 4 Ezra this is done by attributing the entire Tanakh as well as all other books of esoteric teaching to Mosaic revelation;”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch understand and articulate their idea of torah in a way that is characteristic of the sapientialization of the Mosaic tradition in the Second Temple period.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Earthly prosperity is not entirely denied, but anticipated for in the messianic era;”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a matter of fact, not only the sapiential tradition, but also the prophetic as well as the apocalyptic strands, are all placed under Mosaic priority.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, they were certainly not unique in their reverence for the extra-biblical traditions about Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, the “life” in Deuteronomy is redefined to mean eternal life.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The author extends the Deuteronomic horizon through a two-step adaptation.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gore-Jones, When Judaism Lost, 185-86
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the selection of the episodes and the judging criterion are entirely in line with the Deuteronomic view of reward and punishment based on obedience to the Mosaic torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reward is 81 See also Burkes, “‘Life’ Redefined.”82 Henze, “Torah and Eschatology,” 204.83”
- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 · plain
“ever lasting, life in the age to come.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 2.2.1 · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The author of 2 Baruch places himself and his audience at the stage of the last dark waters, enduring the tribulations while preparing their hearts in repentance for the restoration.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many materials they use regarding Moses-for example, as a recipient of esoteric knowledge about the end, or about his being translated to heaven instead of being buried in a tomb-were not their own creation, but expanded Mosaic tradition of the Second Temple period, witnessed also in the legends recorded in other Jewish works such as Jubilees, Testament of Moses, and Liber antiquitatum biblicarum.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Najman's Seconding Sinai
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The very choice of the pseudonyms also testifies their approach to be one not of rejection and replacement, but of accommodation, coordination and ultimately reinterpretation of established traditions.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is equally important to mark how in the two apocalypses, the wisdom tradition is completely submitted under the authority of the Mosaic torah tradition.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and in both their proposed religious renewals, it is the scribal class that will be the core leadership for the future of their faith communities.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Baruch's teaching, therefore, is not intended as new revelation to replace the Mosaic torah, but rather a restoration and reinforcement of the old.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This process reflects religious innovation under the disguise of compliance with established, older traditions.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Baruch clearly adopts the Deuteronomic scheme of sin, punishment, repentance and renewal.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this respect both 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch conform to Sanders's proposition that the Mosaic torah tradition was absorbed into the wisdom tradition, and was interpreted and articulated through the sapiential outlet.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sanders
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The meaning and function of torah is expounded through the interwoven themes of light and darkness, Moses and Adam, and life and death.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the revelation received by Ezra originated from divine wisdom, it is none other than an encore of the Sinai revelation established by Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“here Baruch explicitly draws a comparison between Moses and himself.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch also demonstrate continuity with Hebrew Scripture, in which both the Mosaic and sapiential traditions are embedded.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His question about Israel's torah-based covenant is couched in a sapiential problem of theodicy”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The strongest analogy between Baruch and Moses is found in the Epistle of .”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only Moses, but also Baruch himself and Israel's future teachers prophesied by him are called bringers of light.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firstly, Ezra is portrayed as the second lawgiver in the likeness of Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both apocalypses, torah is understood less as laws and rules, but in terms of wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, Ezra's farewell speech is a shortened imitation of Moses's valedictory exhortation in Deut 30:15-20.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Secondly, not only is Ezra modeled after Moses, the esoteric revelations he has received and now recorded in the seventy books for the wise and worthy are also grafted into the trunk of Mosaic tradition.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Clear evidence for a confluence of the torah of Moses and wisdom emerges from two most commonly quoted examples of sapiential texts: Sirach and 1 Baruch.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 1 Torah in the Hebrew Bible and Apocrypha
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sirach
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 1 Baruch
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second Baruch, on the other hand, deals with the new crisis through a novel interpretation of the old Deuteronomic tradition.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Baruch's last days are also paralleled with those of Moses in Deuteronomy.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only is torah synonymous with wisdom, the giving and teaching of torah is also expressed within the context of seeking and learning wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apparent conflict is resolved through a two-step alignment.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the vision is in fact an extended version of the torah-light metaphor.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the one hand, the protagonists are cast as a type of Moses”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Torah obedience is not understood as moral conduct only”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the author is claiming that the apocalyptic revelations granted to Ezra had previously already been given to Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each of these is modeled after the rhetorical style of Mosaic speech in Deuteronomy”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the problem of Israel's covenant is turned into a sapiential question about human ability to understand divine wisdom (4:5-11; 5:36-40)”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, wisdom received in prophetic and apocalyptic revelations is made sure to also receive the imprimatur of Mosaic authority.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and on the other hand, the revelations they receive are claimed to be part of the revelation at Sinai or the teachings of Moses in Deuteronomy.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the absence of the temple, future access to divine revelation will be through the sages who are the interpreters and teachers of torah, as lamps that carry light.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the postexilic period, a complex phenomenon further emerged, namely the convergence of the concepts of torah and wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 1 Torah in the Hebrew Bible and Apocrypha
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The giving of the torah through Moses is described as an event with cosmic significance:”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The esoteric wisdom thus gains its credentials.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Baruch's intercessions on behalf of the people and his speeches and epistle indicate that Israel is experiencing the stage of repentance, in anticipation of restoration and renewal.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, torah observance is expressed overwhelmingly in the sapiential sense of torah piety, rather than halakhic matters.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When Ezra has eventually proved himself worthy to be the conduit of divine revelation of the torah, he is praised by the Most High for being one that has sought after wisdom”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to 4 Ezra then, 2 Baruch also believes that the future of Israel remains with the scriptures.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The portrayal of Ezra the law giver in 4 Ezra shows that, although torah may be the central key, its pursuit and its teaching are carried out in the sapiential style, as the pursuit and teaching of divine knowledge, especially the esoteric type.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second Baruch also more closely associates torah with the Mosaic torah; nevertheless, as in 4 Ezra, its presentation of torah is still heavily coloured by sapiential vocabulary.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The submission of sapiential revelation to Mosaic authority in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch is rather characteristic of later Second Temple Judaism.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second Baruch's call for a return to the torah is even louder and clearer than 4 Ezra's.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It was through the submission under Mosaic authority that the convergence of diverse traditions was achieved.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“nevertheless, as in 4 Ezra, its presentation of torah is still heavily coloured by sapiential vocabulary.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But in 4 Ezra, the symbolic meaning of such a written torah is more significant.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In terms of its understanding of the torah, therefore, 2 Baruch appears to be even closer to the Mosaic tradition than 4 Ezra.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, in both cases religious renewal is made possible through a reworking of established traditions.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This finding is consistent with that of Sanders and many others, that the torah paradigm is taken up by the wisdom tradition and interpreted in the latter's own terms.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sanders, “Sacred Canopies Collide”
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“No doubt, seventy here symbolizes the totality of knowledge.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hogan
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Najman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Mroczek
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it shows a radically different understanding about how revival and adaptation must be carried out.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The eschatological interpretation of the Deuteronomic scheme has thus resolved a dilemma intensified by the crisis of temple destruction.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 41
- It may state two separate claims as one. 37
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Throughout the apocalypse he lives up to it, as he stubbornly demands to comprehend (3:31), strives to understand (4:12; 5:34; 8:4), searches out the way of the Most High (12:4), beseeches (4:22; 5:56; 12:6; 13:13), and inquires (4:23).”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He engages the angel Uriel in three dialogues to inquire about the reason for Israel's afflictions and what the future holds; he prays and fasts in order to know God's will and the eschatological secrets.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch a similar pattern is discernible: there is a lack of specific discussion of commandments and halakhic rules; instead, torah obedience is expressed in terms of pursuing knowledge and striving to obtain divine teaching.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The dark waters symbolize the “bad” periods represented by Adam and the following generations, Israel's enslavement in Egypt, the Amorites and the days of the Judges, Jeroboam, Manasseh, and the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and the temple.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both claim authority for the wisdom received by their respective protagonist; however, the authority of the “new” revelation must be aligned with the Mosaic torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas for 2 Baruch, the intermediary between God and the covenant people will be the torah itself, accessible through teachers and interpreters the torah shall bring about-scribes like Baruch himself.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Firstly, longevity in itself is made of no value; instead, what matters are the benefits one's life brings to himself and to humanity.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in 2 Baruch, on the other hand, Israel's wise leaders in the future will be interpreters of the Mosaic torah, and divine revelations are only found through interpretations of torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both achieve this by characterizing their protagonist as a type of Moses: 4 Ezra as the second giver of torah, and Baruch as the torah teacher.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It functions as both an overview and a summary of divine revelation through biblical history and through the eschatological knowledge received by Baruch.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the Mosaic, sapiential, prophetic and apocalyptic traditions meet in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, there is no evidence that the ancient authors perceived any conflict or confrontation between them; instead, the diverse traditions were made to show conformity and continuity with the revelation of Sinai.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The wisdom of God Baruch has received reveals an imminent end of this age and the advent of a messianic era, followed by the age to come.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both also submit their own wisdom teaching under the authority of Moses, 4 Ezra by grafting the esoteric knowledge it propagates into the Sinaitic torah tradition, and 2 Baruch by presenting an eschatological interpretation to the Deuteronomic scheme and subordinating wisdom teaching to the Deuteronomic worldview enshrined in the name of Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The author attaches great significance to it by both describing its visual aspects and giving a detailed verbal explanation by the angel Remiel.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is the last vision before Baruch writing the epistle and departing from this world.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What comes after, the last bright waters, is not only the reward promised by the Deuteronomic scheme, but also the end of this age along with all its afflictions and imperfections, according to the wisdom of Baruch's apocalyptic revelation.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch, products of the very end of Second Temple Judaism, do not provide evidence for how the process took place, but they do witness the monumental importance of writing and scriptures;”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After these twelve periods, Baruch sees a last surge of dark waters, representing the sorrows and woes while the world anticipates the end.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This ingenuity is most clearly demonstrated in Baruch's vision of the “bright and dark waters” (chs.53-74), which occupies a strategic position in the book's literary structure.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are followed by another surge of bright waters, symbolizing the coming of the Messiah and the consummation of time.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The bright waters, on the other hand, symbolize the “good” periods of Israelite history, represented by Abrahamic patriarchs, Moses, David and Solomon, Hezekiah, Josiah, and the return from the exile and the rebuilding of the temple.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Although debate over its origins is far from being settled, both prophecy and wisdom have been identified as key influences.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hanson, Dawn of Apocalyptic
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites von Rad, Theologie
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Collins, Apocalyptic Imagination
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The same process of double alignment also occurs in 2 Baruch: the teaching of Baruch is essentially the same teaching of Moses, and Baruch is the second Moses, the teacher of Israel.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The destruction of Jerusalem and the temple triggered the covenant crisis, which led 4 Ezra to a cry for the restoration of the torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Now in the same manner, Ezra is kept from his people for forty days (14:23) before he is given the wisdom to dictate the entire torah, an intentional reference to the forty-day period in which Moses received the Ten Commandments (Exod 34:28).”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whereas in 4 Ezra, torah is compared to a seed to be sown, or food and drinks to be consumed”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The systematic conceptualization of the light metaphor is better seen if the writing is read in Syriac.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The strong sapiential inclination in both apocalypses is clearly visible in two ways: that torah is identified as wisdom and talked about in sapiential terminology; and that each protagonist is portrayed as a seeker or a teacher of wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Not only is the angel Uriel presented as a wisdom teacher, Ezra, the protagonist of the apocalypse, is also portrayed as a sapiential figure.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gore-Jones, 'Unity and Coherence'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The third and final reason for choosing 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch is their strategic position in time: situated at the conclusion of the Second Temple period, they are a precursor to both Rabbinic Judaism and early Christianity.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, both apocalypses were fictitiously set in the period after the destruction of the First Temple in 586 BCE by the Babylonians, and pseudepigraphically attributed to biblical Ezra and Baruch, two representative figures associated with torah and scribal traditions of the Hebrew Bible.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The way Levenson sums up the image of the psalmist in the torah-wisdom Ps 119 also fits Ezra perfectly; he is one whose exclamations are constantly heard”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Levenson, 'Source of Torah'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through a study of two Jewish apocalypses, 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch, the essay discovers not only the sapientialization of the Mosaic torah, but also the total submission of the wisdom tradition under the authority of the Mosaic torah tradition to gain legitimacy.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It has been previously argued that, as the Mosaic torah had gained dominance, the wisdom school absorbed and accommodated the Mosaic torah tradition, and yet maintained all the essential elements of the sapiential tradition.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction1 · boosted
“Sanders concludes that the wisdom school absorbed and accommodated the Mosaic torah tradition, yet maintained all the essential elements of the sapiential tradition.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Sanders
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Also stated in: § Introduction1 · boosted
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“in 2 Baruch torah is light that enables one to see the way, to dissipate darkness, to give life, and as a lamp to be passed down from Moses to Israel and their descendants.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the narrative all these things would then be written down and counted as God's torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, 4 Ezra never departs from the conviction that torah foremost refers to the law of Moses and has its roots in Israel's Sinaitic tradition.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Torah is equated with the covenant (5:29).”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, the understanding of torah and wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch also foreshadows later Jewish and Christian development of these traditions.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like in Sirach, so in 4 Ezra torah is identified as divine wisdom; in particular, torah is the law given at Sinai, a book/books of covenant.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“On the other hand, both apocalypses show an unmistakable sapiential outlook; their affinity to wisdom books and the wisdom tradition, such as Job, Proverbs, Qoheleth, and torah-wisdom Psalms, has been explored in many previous studies.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Knibb, 'Apocalyptic and Wisdom'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hogan, Theologies in Conflict
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Kim, 'Wisdom and Apocalyptic'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have seen above that 4 Ezra proposes an eschatological solution to the covenantal crisis and turns esoteric wisdom into torah, thus expanding the content of torah.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For our purpose here, it is clearly a literary strategy to reconcile the potential confrontation of the two torahs, one through Moses, and the other, Ezra.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The close affinity of the two apocalyptic works to rabbinic circles has been well observed by several scholars.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Longenecker, 'Locating 4 Ezra'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Bogaert, L' Apocalypse
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ezra, on the other hand, is also like the sagely Job, whose questions are not answered directly, but who is given a glimpse of unfathomable divine mysteries.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prophets and teachers pass, but the torah abides.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The esoteric part had been unknown because it had been concealed by God's command.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“namely, the total submission of wisdom under the supremacy of Moses.Both 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch also demonstrate this.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It argues that this is done through a submission of sapiential revelations to the Mosaic revelation received at Sinai, and a portrayal of wisdom recipients and apocalyptic visionaries as types of Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Secondly, both 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch belong to the apocalyptic literary genre, which itself was a product of the amalgamation of diverse traditions in the Second Temple period.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hanson, Dawn of Apocalyptic
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Collins, 'Prophecy to Apocalypticism'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites von Rad, Theologie
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As I have stated above, torah for 4 Ezra has a broad range of meaning that encompasses divine revelation written and unwritten, and ultimately the wisdom of God.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Firstly, it is believed that both works represented Jewish response to the destruction of Jerusalem and the Second Temple in 70 CE.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > Introduction1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Stone, Fourth Ezra
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sense, torah is another word for Israel's covenant and identity.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, it is not a new idea that scripturalization and the scribal class served as the nexus and crucible for the process of integration of various traditions,89 especially the merging of torah and wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In it he sees the entire human history, especially biblical history, divided into twelve periods, represented by bright and dark waters alternating, pouring down from a primeval cloud symbolizing time foreordained by God.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is noteworthy as well that they are expressed in a common sapiential parlance”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Torah indeed adopted the wisdom lens and voice; but wisdom itself eventually had to gain authority and legitimacy by becoming part of the ancient torah mediated through Moses.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 3 Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apocalyptic wisdom of Baruch does not negate the Mosaic teaching in Deuteronomy; on the contrary, it complements the latter and offers itself as a useful solution to the otherwise endless vicious cycle of sin and punishment in the Deuteronomic scheme.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also interesting how Ezra the scribe figure in the apocalypse combines the three traditional offices of sage, lawgiver, and prophet in one.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mroczek, however, argues that the number should be understood symbolically, rather than strictly realistically.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mroczek
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is how the eschatological worldview has put an end to the vicious cycle of sin and punishment and turned the Deuteronomic promise of reward into permanent good news.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The genius of 2 Baruch, as Henze comments, indeed lies in its ability of integrating multiple strands of Jewish thoughts, especially the seemingly mutually exclusive Deuteronomic and eschatological worldviews.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Henze, “Torah and Eschatology,” 204
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The biblical foundation of such a metaphor is specifically found in prophetic and wisdom literature”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 4 Ezra, however, what has been lost is not only guidance, but more precisely the covenant in written form.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Torah is thus one entity encompassing law, secret revelations, spoken prophetic words, and written books-ultimately God's wisdom.”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The repeated exhortation calling the people to prepare their hearts and souls for that which is to come strongly illustrates this point:”
§ Torah as Wisdom in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch > 2.2.1
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Scribal schools played a crucial role in the transmission and integration of various traditions in the Second Temple period.
“Historically, scribal schools were likely to have played a crucial role in the transmission and integration of various traditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The wisdom tradition and the Mosaic torah tradition are distinct entities that can be said to interact, absorb, or submit to one another.
“In the postexilic period, a complex phenomenon further emerged, namely the convergence of the concepts of torah and wisdom.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Deuteronomic promise consists of land, longevity and worldly prosperity.
“Within the context of the catastrophic destruction of the Second Temple, it can hardly be the Deuteronomic promise of land, longevity and worldly prosperity.”
Citations
Cites
The social construction of reality : a treatise in the sociology of knowledge
Simpson, G., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091739 · Cited by 16,462
The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion
Knudten, R. D., & Berger, P. L. (1968) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384646 · Cited by 3,550
Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School
Reif, S. C., & Weinfeld, M. (1973) · The Jewish Quarterly Review · doi:10.2307/1453375 · Cited by 668
The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature
Collins, J. J. (1998) · Cited by 555
The Literary Imagination in Jewish Antiquity
Mroczek, E. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190279837.001.0001 · Cited by 383
Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature
Carr, D. M. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195172973.001.0001 · Cited by 316
Writing on the Tablet of the Heart: Origins of Scripture and Literature
Sanders, J. A., & Carr, D. M. (2006) · Journal of Biblical Literature · doi:10.2307/27638408 · Cited by 294
The formation of the Hebrew Bible: a new reconstruction
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6224 · Cited by 226
Legal Revision and Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel
Levinson, B. M. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499029 · Cited by 187
Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Age
Lim, T. H., & Collins, J. J. (1999) · The Jewish Quarterly Review · doi:10.2307/1455414 · Cited by 166
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Burkes, Shannon. "'Life' Redefined: Wisdom and Law in Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch." Catholic Biblical Quarterly 63 (2001), 55-71.
- See, for example, the two books of Carr, Tablet of Heart and Formation of Hebrew Bible. Journal for the Study of Judaism 52 (2021) 388-416
- Collins, John J. "From Prophecy to Apocalypticism: The Expectation of the End." In The Origins of Apocalypticism in Judaism and Christianity, ed. John J. Collins. Vol. 1 of The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism, ed. John J. Collins, Bernard McGinn and Stephen J. Stein (New York: Continuum, 1998), 129-61.
- Kim, Daewoong. "Wisdom and Apocalyptic in 2 Baruch." Henoch 33 (2011), 250-74.
- Knibb, Michael A. "The Second Book of 2 Esdras." In The First and Second Books of Esdras, Richard J. Coggins and Michael. A. Knibb (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 76-305.
- Sanders, Jack T. "When Sacred Canopies Collide." Journal for the Study of Judaism 32 (2001), 121-36.
- Seybold, Klaus. Die Psalmen (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996). Gore-Jones Journal for the Study of Judaism 52 (2021) 388-416
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revelation Behind the Veil: An Intertextual Analysis
Palanci, M. K. (2025) · UMDE Dini Tetkikler Dergisi · doi:10.54122/umde.1685849 · Cited by 1
Teugels, L. M. (2023) · doi:10.1515/ejcro.18130553 · Cited by 1
Proverbs 31:10–31: An antithesis of pre-exilic Hebrew womanhood?
Nyarko-Mensah, P., & Human, D. J. (2024) · Verbum et Ecclesia · doi:10.4102/ve.v45i1.2977
Metadata
- Authors
- Gore-Jones, L.
- Affiliations
- St Andrew’s Greek Orthodox Theological College Surry Hills NSW Australia
- Corresponding author
- Gore-Jones, Lydia
- ORCID
- Gore-Jones, Lydia
- Venue
- Journal for the Study of Judaism
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2021-02-23
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 388-416
- ISSN
- 0047-2212 (ISSN-L)
- 1570-0631
- OpenAlex
- W3134877983
- Semantic Scholar
- c7792372e6b240974b9a218ac95f3d7d1957a155
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal for the Study of Judaism (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Keywords
- Pentateuch, wisdom, 4 Ezra, 2 Baruch, Second Temple Judaism, Jewish apocalypses, Moses, religious innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
