Cited by 31Biblical Studies and InterpretationHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesReligion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity

The Use of Term 'Son of Man' in the Similitudes of Enoch

Casey, Maurice·1976·Journal for the Study of Judaism

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/157006376x00023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deleuze and Guattari intend the rhizome image to represent something more thoroughly ecological than its strict sense might suggest.

    “They intend the image of the rhizome, however, to represent something more thoroughly ecological than, in its strictest sense, it might be understood to label.17”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casey, M.
Affiliations
1Ushaw Moor, Durham, U.K.
Corresponding author
Casey, Maurice
Venue
Journal for the Study of Judaism
Published
1976
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11-29
ISSN
  • 0047-2212 (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-0631
OpenAlex
W2047244305
Cited by
30
References
0
FWCI
55.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Study of Judaism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Keywords
Son of Man, Enoch, Second Temple Judaism, messianic imagery, heavenly ascent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review