Indigenous peoples between human rights and environmental protection-an Arctic perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MMPA affects the ability of Indigenous Peoples to sell marine mammal products through importation bans.
“The MMPA also affects the ability of Indigenous Peoples to sell marine mammal products through importation banswhich some consider a human rights issue (Lynge, 1995) and violation of Indigenous sovereignty (Fakhri, 2017).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Lynge, 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lynge, F.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Lynge, Finn
- Venue
- Nordic Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 489-494
- ISSN
- 0029-151X (ISSN-L)
- 0902-7351
- 1571-8107
- OpenAlex
- W1980513522
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nordic Journal of International Law (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- indigenous peoples, human rights, environmental protection, Arctic, indigenous rights, environmental law, Arctic Council
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
