CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeological Research and ProtectionLabor Movements and Unions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Battlefields of Class Conflict: Ludlow Then and Now

Saitta, Dean, Walker, Mark, Reckner, Paul·2005·Journal of Conflict Archaeology
DOI 10.1163/157407705774928971
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In April 1914, a tent colony of striking coal miners at Ludlow, Colorado was the setting of the most notorious example of open class warfare in American History. This paper explores some dimensions of the conflict as revealed by archaeological investigations at the Ludlow Massacre Memorial. We consider the tactical strategies used by Labor and Capital to gain advantage in the conflict, as well as the survival strategies employed by ordinary people in harm's way. We also address recent vandalism at the Memorial which suggests that, ninety years later, the Ludlow ground remains a contested landscape.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/157407705774928971

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Delarbre R, 2003, La Cronica de Hoy
  2. Fetty C.R., 2001, in Strike Force, Knights of the Union
  3. Firestone D, 2001, The New York Times
  4. Gray A, 2005, Contested Ideals: Cultural Citizenship at the Ludlow Tent Colony
  5. Green A, 1995, Labor’s Heritage, 6, 26
  6. Labor Heritage Foundation n.d., Inventory of American Labor Landmarks
  7. Limerick P, 1998, The Denver Post, G-01
  8. McGuire R, 2004, Archaeology, 57, 62
  9. Otterbein K, 2003, Anthropology News
  10. Saitta D, 2005, North American Archaeology, 359
  11. Strom S, 2000, The Business Journal of Portland
  12. Tomasky M, 1997, Lingua Franca, 40
  13. Whiteside J, 1990, Regulating Danger
  14. Wood M, 2002, The Dynamics of Power

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Saitta, D., Walker, M., & Reckner, P.
Venue
Journal of Conflict Archaeology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-11
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
197-213
ISSN
  • 1574-0773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-0781
DOI
10.1163/157407705774928971
OpenAlex
W2080234293
Cited by
9
References
31
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Conflict Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
Keywords
Ludlow Massacre, coal miners, strikes, class struggle, labor-capital conflict, contested landscapes, survival strategies, mining history, Colorado

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review