CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Analytical Concept of Asymmetrical Dependency

Winnebeck, Julia, Sutter, Ove, Hermann, Adrian, Antweiler, Christoph, Conermann, Stephan·2023·Journal of Global Slavery
DOI 10.1163/2405836x-00801002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In response to critiques of the ‘slavery versus freedom’ binary and its limitations, researchers at the international Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies (BCDSS—www.dependency.uni-bonn.de) at the University of Bonn tentatively employ the analytical concept of ‘asymmetrical dependency’ in their investigations of coercive social relations, such as slavery, debt bondage, and servitude. In this paper, we discuss some basic theoretical assumptions that undergird this analytical concept. In outlining an approach to asymmetrical dependency that is grounded in social and cultural theory, our goal is to provide a framework within which individual researchers can situate their projects and further develop their theoretical understanding of this phenomenon. To this end, we first introduce the analytical concept of asymmetrical dependency and explore its potential in light of the current state of research of slavery studies and related fields. We then conceptualize asymmetrical dependency as a dynamic relational process and employ a chiefly praxeological methodology to identify and describe some fundamental dynamics of these relations. Finally, we argue that the interdisciplinary study of asymmetrical dependency requires a broad practice of comparative analyses. We, therefore, consider several recent critiques of and models for comparison while relating them to the analytical concept of asymmetrical dependency we propose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/2405836x-00801002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 109

  1. Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” In Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster (London: New Left Books, 1971), 121–176.
  2. Amin, Samir. Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formation of Peripheral Capitalism (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1976.)
  3. Asad, Talal. “Conscripts of Western Civilization.” In Civilization in Crisis: Anthropological Perspectives, ed. Christine Ward Gailey. Vol. 1 of Dialectical Anthropology: Essays in Honor of Stanley Diamond (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1992), 333–351.
  4. Asprem, Egil. “Beyond the West: Towards a New Comparativism in the Study of Esotericism.” Correspondences: Online Journal for the Academic Study of Western Esotericism 2 (1) (2014): 3–33. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://correspondencesjournal.com/12302-2/.
  5. Austin, Gareth. “Reciprocal Comparison and African History: Tackling Conceptual Eurocentrism in the Study of Africa’s Economic Past.” African Studies Review 50 (3) (2007): 1–28.
  6. Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3) (2003): 801–831.
  7. Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009).
  8. Bergunder, Michael. “Comparison in the Maelstrom of Historicity: A Postcolonial Perspective on Comparative Religion.” In Interreligious Comparisons in Religious Studies and Theology: Comparison Revisited, eds. Perry Schmidt-Leukel and Andreas Nehring (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), 34–52.
  9. Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture (London: Routledge, 1994).
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).
  11. Bourdieu, Pierre. Practical Reason. On the Theory of Action (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994).
  12. Bourdieu, Pierre. Masculine Domination, trans. Richard Nice (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001).
  13. Brathwaite, Edward Kamau. “Creolization in Jamaica.” In The Post-colonial Studies Reader, eds. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. (London: Routledge, 1995), 202–205.
  14. Campbell, Gwyn, and Elizabeth Elbourne, eds. Sex, Power, and Slavery (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2014).
  15. Cerman, Markus. “‘Serfdom’ and Slavery in European History since the Middle Ages: Identifying Common Aspects for Future Research. Contribution to the Final Round Table.” In Schiavitù e servaggio nell’economia Europea, secc. XI–XVIII / Serfdom and Slavery in the European Economy, 11th–18th Centuries, ed. Simonetta Cavaciocchi (Firenze: Firenze University Press, 2014), 665–676.
  16. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
  17. Chakraborty, Titas, and Matthias van Rossum. “Slave Trade and Slavery in Asia—New Perspective.” Journal of Social History 54 (1) (2020): 1–14.
  18. Chevaleyre, Claude. “The Abolition of Slavery and the Status of Slaves in Late Imperial China.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Bondage and Human Rights in Africa and Asia, eds. Alessandro Stanziani and Gwyn Campbell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), 57–82.
  19. Coleman, James S. Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).
  20. Cardoso, Fernando H., and Enzo Faletto. Dependency and Development in Latin America, trans. Marjory Mattingly Urquidi (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).
  21. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6) (1991): 1241–1299.
  22. Davis, David Brion. “Re-Examining the Problem of Slavery in Western Culture.” Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society 118 (2) (2008): 247–266.
  23. Deville, Joe, Michael Guggenheim, and Zuzana Hrdličková, eds. Practising Comparison: Logics, Relations, Collaborations (Manchester: Mattering Press, 2016).
  24. De Vito, Christian G., and Anne Gerritsen. “Micro-Spatial Histories of Global Labour: Towards a new Global History.” In Micro-Spatial Histories of Global Labour, eds. Christian G. De Vito and Anne Gerritsen (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), 1–28.
  25. De Vito, Christian G., and Anne Gerritsen, eds. Micro-Spatial Histories of Global Labour (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
  26. De Vito, Christian G. “History Without Scale: The Micro-Spatial Perspective.” Past and Present: A Journal of Historical Studies 242 (S14) (2019): 348–372.
  27. De Vito, Christian G., Juliane Schiel, and Matthias van Rossum. “From Bondage to Precariousness? New Perspectives on Labor and Social History.” Journal of Social History 54 (2) (2020): 644–662.
  28. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., ed. Multiple Modernities (Somerset: Routledge, 2002).
  29. Elias, Friederike, Albrecht Franz, Henning Murmann, and Ulrich Wilhelm Weiser, eds. Praxeologie: Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Reichweite praxistheoretischer Ansätze in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).
  30. Eltis, David, Stanley L. Engerman, gen. eds. The Cambridge World History of Slavery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011–2021).
  31. Eltis, David, and Stanley L. Engerman. “Dependence, Servility and Coerced Labor in Time and Space.” In The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Vol. 3: AD1420–AD 1804, eds. David Eltis, Stanley L. Engerman, Seymour Drescher, and David Richardson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 1–21.
  32. Emerson, Richard M. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27 (1) (1962): 31–41.
  33. Epple, Angelika and Antje Flüchter. “Concluding Observations: Modes of Comparing and Communities of Practice.” In Contact, Conquest and Colonization: How Practices of Comparing Shaped Empires and Colonialism Around the World, eds. Eleonora Rohland, Angelika Epple, Antje Flüchter, and Kirsten Kramer (New York: Routledge, 2021), 332–338.
  34. Ferguson, James. “Declarations of Dependence: Labour, Personhood and Welfare in Southern Africa.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (2) (2013): 223–242.
  35. Fitzgerald, Timothy. The Ideology of Religious Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
  36. Finley, Moses I. Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology, ed. Brent Shaw (New York: The Viking Press, 1980).
  37. Freiberger, Oliver. Considering Comparison: A Method for Religious Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019).
  38. Gell, Alfred. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).
  39. Haraway, Donna J. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
  40. Hermann, Adrian. “European History of Religion, Global History of Religion: On the Expansion of a Gladigowian Concept for the Study of Religion.” In Die kulturwissenschaftliche Wende in der Religionswissenschaft: Der Beitrag Burkhard Gladigows / The Cultural Turn in the Study of Religion: The Contribution of Burkhard Gladigow, eds. Christoph Auffarth, Alexandra Grieser, and Anne Koch (Tübingen: Tübingen University Press, 2021), 237–268.
  41. Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970).
  42. Hoch, Steven L. Serfdom and Social Control in Nineteenth Century Russia. Petrovskoe, a village in Tambov (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).
  43. Hoolbraad, Martin and Morten Axel Pedersen. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  44. Johnson, Walter. “On Agency.” Journal of Social History 37 (1) (2003): 113–124.
  45. Keane, Webb. “Perspectives on Affordances, Or the Anthropologically Real: The 2018 Daryll Forde Lecture.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8(1/2) (2018): 27–38.
  46. Kloß, Sinah. “Embodying Dependency: Caribbean Godna (Tattoos) as Female Subordination and Resistance.” The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 27 (2022): 1–12.
  47. Knauer, Lisa Maya. “Consuming Slavery, Performing Cuba: Ethnography, Carnival and Black Public Culture.” Ethnicity and Race in a Changing World: A Review Journal 2 (2) (2011): 3–25.
  48. Kopytoff, Igor. “Slavery.” Annual Review of Anthropology 11 (1982): 207–230.
  49. Králová, Jana. “What is Social Death?.” Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences 10 (3) (2015): 235–248.
  50. Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
  51. Luhmann, Niklas. “The Improbability of Communication.” International Social Science Journal 33 (1) (1981): 122–132.
  52. Machado, Maria Helena P.T. “Slavery and Social Movements in Nineteenth-Century Brazil: Slave Strategies and Abolition in São Paulo.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 34 (1/2) (2011): 163–191.
  53. Mader, Christian, Markus Reindel, and Johny Isla. “Economic Directness in the Western Andes: A New Model of So-cioeconomic Organization for the Paracas Culture in the First Millennium BC.” Latin American Antiquity 33 (2022): 1–19.
  54. Marschke, Melissa and Peter Vandergeest. “Slavery Scandals: Unpacking Labour Challenges and Policy Responses within the Off-Shore Fisheries Sector.” Marine Policy 68 (2016): 39–46.
  55. Marshall, Lydia W. “Introduction: The Comparative Archaeology of Slavery.” In The Archaeology of Slavery: A Comparative Approach to Captivity and Coercion, ed. Lydia Wilson Marshall (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2015), 1–23.
  56. Marston, Sallie A., John P. Jones, and Keith Woodward. “Human Geography Without Scale.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4) (2005): 416–432.
  57. Mende, Janne. “The Concept of Modern Slavery: Definition, Critique, and the Human Rights Frame.” Human Rights Review 20 (2) (2019): 229–248.
  58. Meyer, Birgit. “Religion as Mediation.” Entangled Religions 11 (3) (2020). Accessed May 6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.13154/er.11.2020.8444. · DOI
  59. Michaels, James W. and James A. Wiggins. “Effects of Mutual Dependency and Dependency Asymmetry on Social Exchange.” Sociometry: A Journal of Research in Social Psychology 39 (4) (1976): 368–376.
  60. Miers, Suzanne. “Slavery: A Question of Definition, Slavery and Abolition.” Slavery and Abolition: A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies 24 (2) (2003): 1–16.
  61. Miller, Joseph C. The Problem of Slavery as History: A Global Approach (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).
  62. Miller, Daniel, ed. Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
  63. Morgan, Lynn M. “Dependency Theory in the Political Economy of Health: An Anthropological Critique.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1 (2) (1987): 131–154.
  64. Murphy, Laura T. The New Slave Narrative: The Battle Over Representations of Contemporary Slavery (New York: Columbia University Press, 2019).
  65. Nassehi, Armin, “Die Theorie funktionaler Differenzierung im Horizont ihrer Kritik.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 33, no. 2 (2004): 98–118.
  66. Needell, Jeffrey D. “The Abolition of the Brazilian Slave Trade in 1850: Historiography, Slave Agency and States.” Journal of Latin American Studies 33 (4) (2001): 681–711.
  67. Nicolaas, Samantha S., Matthias Van Rossum, and Ulbe Bosma. “Towards an Indian Ocean and Maritime Asia Slave Trade Database: An Exploration of Concepts Lessons and Models.” Slaveries and Post-Slaveries 3 (2020): 1–30.
  68. Østhus, Hanne. “Were All Servants Women? Reflections on the Use of Gender in Research on Domestic Service.” In Gender, History, Futures, Report from the XI Nordic Women’s and Gender History Conference, eds. Daniel Nyström and Johanna Overud (Stockholm: SKOGH, 2018), 103–111.
  69. Patterson, Orlando. “Revisiting Slavery, Property, and Social Death.” In On Human Bondage. After Slavery and Social Death, eds. John Bodel and Walter Scheidel (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017), 265–296.
  70. Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death. A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).
  71. Peacock, Vita. “Academic Precarity as Hierarchical Dependence in the Max Planck Society.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (1) (2016.): 95–119.
  72. Quirk, Joel. “Ending Slavery in all its Forms: Legal Abolition and Effective Emancipation in Historical Perspective.” The International Journal of Human Rights 12 (4) (2008): 529–554.
  73. Quirk, Joel. The Anti-Slavery Project: From the Slave Trade to Human Trafficking, ed. Bert B. Lockwood (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).
  74. Reckwitz, Andreas. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2) (2002): 243–263.
  75. Rio, Alice. “Self-sale and Voluntary Entry into Unfreedom, 300–1100.” Journal of Social History 45 (3) (2012): 661–685.
  76. Rio, Alice. Slavery After Rome: 500–1100 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017).
  77. Rohland, Eleonora and Kirsten Kramer. “Introduction: On ‘Doing Comparison’—Practices of Comparing.” In Contact, Conquest and Colonization: How Practices of Comparing Shaped Empires and Colonialism Around the World, eds. Eleonora Rohland, Angelika Epple, Antje Flüchter, and Kirsten Kramer (New York: Routledge, 2021), 1–16.
  78. Rossi, Benedetta. “From Slavery? Rethinking Slave Descent as an Analytical Category: The Case of the Mauritanian and Moroccan Haratin.” L’Ouest Saharien 10–11 (2020): 187–208.
  79. Roth, Ulrike. “Slavery and the Church in Visigothic Spain: The Donation and Will of Vincent of Huesca.” Antiquité Tardive 24 (2016): 433–452.
  80. Rotman, Youval. Byzantine Slavery and the Mediterranean World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009).
  81. Schatzki, Theodore R. Social Practices. A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
  82. Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (London: Routledge, 2001).
  83. Schatzki, Theodore R. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).
  84. Schatzki, Theodore R. “Practice Theory as Flat Ontology.” In Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, eds. Gert Spaargaren, Don Weenink, and Machiel Lamers (London: Routledge, 2016), 28–42.
  85. Schatzki, Theodore R. “Sayings, Texts, and Discursive Formations.” In The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners, eds. Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki, Elizabeth Shove (London: Routledge, 2017), 126–140.
  86. Schiel, Juliane. “The Ragusan ‘Maids-of-all-Work.’ Shifting Labor Relations in the Late Medieval Adriatic Sea Region.” Journal of Global Slavery 5 (2) (2020): 139–169.
  87. Schmieder, Ulrike. “Masculine and Feminine Identities of Slaves, Patrocinados and Freedmen in Cuba in the 1880s.” EnterText: An Interactive Interdisciplinary E-Journal for Cultural and Historical Studies and Creative Work 12 (2018). Accessed May 6, 2021. http://www.brunel.ac.uk/creative-writing/research/entertext/issues.
  88. Schwartz, Stuart B. “Denounced by Lévi Strauss CLAH Luncheon Address.” The Americas: A Quarterly Review of Latin American History 59 (1) (2002): 1–8.
  89. Scott, David. Refashioning Futures: Criticism, After Postcoloniality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
  90. Scott, David. Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004).
  91. Scott, James C. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66 (1) (1972): 91–113.
  92. Scott, Joan W. Gender and the Politics of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988).
  93. Sinha, Manisha. “Guest Editor’s Introduction: The Future of Abolition Studies.” The Journal of the Civil War Era 8 (2) (2018): 187–189.
  94. Smith, Jonathan Zittel. “The ‘End’ of Comparison. Redescription and Rectification.” In A Magic Still Dwells: Comparative Religion in the Postmodern Age, eds. Kimberly C. Patton, and Benjamin C. Ray (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), 237–241.
  95. Stichweh, Rudolf. “Conceptual Structures for a Theory of World Society.” In Challenges of Globalization and Prospects for an Inter-civilizational World Order, ed. Ino Rossi (Cham: Springer, 2020), 89–104.
  96. Stichweh, Rudolf. “How Do Divided Societies Come About? Persistent Inequalities, Pervasive Asymmetrical Dependencies, and Sociocultural Polarization as Divisive Forces in Contemporary Society.” Global Perspectives 2 (1) (2021): 25658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.25658. · DOI
  97. Stoler, Ann Laura. “Tense and Tender Ties: The Politics of Comparison in North American History and (Post) Colonial Studies.” The Journal of American History 88 (3) (2001): 829–865.
  98. Strathern, Marylin. The Gender of the Gift. Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).
  99. Strube, Julian. Global Tantra: Religion, Science, and Nationalism Colonial Modernity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2022).
  100. Testart, Alain. “The Extent and Significance of Debt Slavery.” Revue Française de Sociologie 43 (2001): 173–204.
  101. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom, at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015).
  102. Van der Veer, Peter. The Value of Comparison (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016).
  103. Van Oyen, Astrid. “Material Agency.” In The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, ed. Sandra L. López Varela (Oxford: Wiley, 2018), 1–5.
  104. Van Rossum, Matthias, Alexander Geelen, Bram van den Hout, and Merve Tosun. Testimonies of Enslavement: Sources on Slavery from the Indian Ocean World (London: Bloomsbury, 2020).
  105. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 (New York: Academic Press, 1980).
  106. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004).
  107. Whitehouse, Harvey. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission (Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press, 2004).
  108. Wissen, Markus, and Matthias Naumann. “Dialectics of Spatial Assimilation and Differentiation: The Uneven-development Concept in Radical Geography.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 7 (3) (2008): 377–406.
  109. Zacek, Natalie. “Holding the Whip-Hand: The Female Slaveholder in Myth and Reality.” Journal of Global Slavery 6 (1) (2021): 55–80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Winnebeck, J., Sutter, O., Hermann, A., Antweiler, C., & Conermann, S.
Affiliations
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies, Ancient Church History, Faculty of Protestant Theology Germany Bonn
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Department of Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology, Cultural Analysis and Cultural Anthropology Faculty of Arts Germany Bonn
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies, Religion Studies, Faculty of Arts Germany Bonn
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies, Southeast Asian Studies Germany Bonn
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies, History of the Islamicate World, Faculty of Arts Germany Bonn
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Global Slavery
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2023-02-23
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-59
ISSN
  • 2405-8351
  • 2405-836X
DOI
10.1163/2405836x-00801002
Cited by
22
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review