The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Great War and Modern Memory
Abstract
s The Great War and Modern Memory.It is a book which First World War literary scholars and historians return to obsessively, with a mixture of admiration and irritation.The admiration is for the way in which Fussell pioneered thinking about the war in terms of its impact on cultural history, rather than in terms of its military or geopolitical significance; his attention to literary detail; and the emotional intensity of his argument, both moving and sobering.The irritation flows from his narrow interpretation of the conflict; his sub-Northrop Fryean mode of literary analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kwon, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807596 · Cited by 411
Plenitude, scarcity and the circulation of cultural memory
Rigney, A. (2005) · Journal of European Studies · doi:10.1177/0047244105051158 · Cited by 265
Kleinman, A. (1997) · Harvard Theological Review · doi:10.1017/s0017816000006374 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Venue
- The SHAFR Guide Online
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- OpenAlex
- W2096505168
- Cited by
- 1,291
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Great War and Modern Memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim100050008
- The paper
- The Great War and Modern Memory. (2017). The SHAFR Guide Online. https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim100050008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
