The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam
Abstract
Vietnam was America's most divisive and unsuccessful foreign war. It was also the first to be televised and the first of the modern era fought without military censorship. From the earliest days of the Kennedy-Johnson escalation right up to the American withdrawal, and even today, the media's role in Vietnam has continued to be intensely controversial. The Uncensored gives a richly detailed account of what Americans read and watched about Vietnam. Hallin draws on the complete body of the New York Times from 1961 to 1965, a sample of hundreds of television reports from 1965-73, including television filmed by the Defense Department in the early years of the and interviews with many of the journalists who reported it, to give a powerful critique of the conventional wisdom, both conservative and liberal, about the media and Vietnam. Far from being a consistent adversary of government policy in Vietnam, Hallin shows, the media were closely tied to official perspectives throughout the though divisions in the government itself and contradictions in its public relations policies caused every administration, at certain times, to lose its ability to manage the news effectively. As for television, it neither showed the literal horror of war, nor did it play a leading role in the collapse of support: it presented a highly idealized picture of the war in the early years, and shifted toward a more critical view only after public unhappiness and elite divisions over the war were well advanced. The Uncensored is essential reading for anyone interested in the history of the Vietnam war or the role of the media in contemporary American politics. A groundbreaking study of the media's influence on the Vietnam War .Overturns the conventional notions about the media's role in the war .Draws directly on a huge body of newspaper and TV coverage
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is journalism?: Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered
Deuze, M. (2005) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884905056815 · Cited by 1,756
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media
Mutz, D. C. (2001) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055401000223 · Cited by 700
Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force
Jentleson, B. W., & Britton, R. L. (1998) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002798042004001 · Cited by 375
Gatekeeping, Indexing, and Live-Event News: Is Technology Altering the Construction of News?
LIVINGSTON, S., & BENNETT, W. L. (2003) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600390244121 · Cited by 317
Crossing the Water's Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon
Groeling, T., & Baum, M. A. (2008) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381608081061 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Venue
- The SHAFR Guide Online
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- OpenAlex
- W2070075534
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040274
- The paper
- The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam. (2017). The SHAFR Guide Online. https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim270040274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.