The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lost Horizon: H.P. Blavatsky and Theosophical Orientalism
Abstract
The premise of is that there is an essential polarity between East and West. All the narratives and images are common in the modern West and, again, all trade in stereotypes, fostering a perception of the exotic and the essential otherness of the Orient. A key tenet of Theosophy, is the belief in the existence of a Divine Wisdom, Theosophia, which constitutes an ageless, occult guide to life, the universe, and everything. However, this type of Orientalist perennialism, which sought archaic connections between disparate philosophies, religions, and spiritualities, is likewise very typical of the period. Moreover, as well as the Romantic penchant for Orientalist perennialism, it was also prevalent among nineteenth century Hindu reformers. The point to note is that, while one might debate the details of Blavatsky's Orientalism, in the final analysis it was Orientalism and functioned, as all Orientalism does, as a form of colonialism. Keywords:colonialism; Exoteric Hinduism; H.P. Blavatsky; Theosophical Orientalism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent historiographical tendency portrays the Theosophical Society as an essentially Western movement.
“Bringing these men into the conversation is significant as a corrective to a recent historiographical tendency to portray the Theosophical Society as an essentially Western movement.”
From Nothing Personal: Blavatsky and Her Indian Interlocutors (2021) · cites this paper as Partridge 2013: 327
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism
Asprem, E., & Strube, J. (2021) · doi:10.1163/9789004446458 · Cited by 63
Nothing Personal: Blavatsky and Her Indian Interlocutors
Chajes, J. (2021) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-12341648 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Partridge, C.
- Corresponding author
- Partridge, Christopher
- Venue
- Handbook of the Theosophical Current
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Pages
- 309-333
- OpenAlex
- W168161492
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- H. P. Blavatsky, Theosophy, Orientalism, colonialism, exoticism, Romanticism, otherness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review