On Using Multimedia in Language Renewal: Observations from Making the CD-ROM Taitaduhaan
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cost of developing and creating materials and software, filming, recording and purchasing hardware were very costly and involved considerable amounts of time.
“The cost of developing and creating materials and software, filming, recording and purchasing hardware, such as desktops and other multimedia tools, were very costly and involved considerable amounts of time (Kroskrity & Reynolds, 2001).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Kroskrity & Reynolds, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kroskrity, P. V., & Reynolds, J. F.
- Venue
- The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Pages
- 317-329
- OpenAlex
- W805951977
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Acquisition and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- multimedia, language revitalization, endangered languages, CD-ROM, language documentation, digital language resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
