Can the Web Help Save My Language?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This element can appeal particularly to the younger Indigenous generation and help restore prestige and pride in Indigenous languages and cultures.
“This element can appeal particularly to the younger Indigenous generation and help restore prestige and pride in Indigenous languages and cultures (Buszard-Welcher 2001).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Buszard-Welcher, 2001
Technology in the Web 1.0 era did offer much potential for ILR and also had an additional 'cool' element.
“Technology in the Web 1.0 era did offer much potential for ILR and also had an additional “cool” element (Buszard-Welcher, 2001, p. 337).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Buszard-Welcher, 2001
Buszard-Welcher (2001) found that 38% of the 50 sites on 'Native American or Canadian' Indigenous languages belonged to groups and only four of those were created by a 'Tribal' member or official organization.
“Looking in more detail at who creates endangered language websites and the level of knowledge co-creation, Buszard-Welcher (2001) finds that 38% of the 50 sites on “Native American or Canadian” Indigenous languages belonged to groups and only four of those were created by a “Tribal” member or official organization (p. 332).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Buszard-Welcher, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buszard-Welcher, L.
- Corresponding author
- Buszard-Welcher, Laura
- Venue
- The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Pages
- 331-345
- OpenAlex
- W852571948
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Keywords
- language preservation, endangered languages, digital language resources, language revitalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
