The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Late Sixteenth-Century Chinese Buddhist Fellowship: Spiritual Ambitions, Intellectual Debates, and Epistolary Connections
Abstract
Through a detailed analysis of epistolary writing, A Late Sixteenth-Century Chinese Buddhist Fellowship: Spiritual Ambitions, Intellectual Debates, and Epistolary Connections brings to life the Buddhist discourse of a network of lay disciples who debated the value of Chan versus Pure Land, sudden versus gradual enlightenment, adherence to Buddhist precepts, and animal welfare. By highlighting the differences between their mentor, the monk Zhuhong 袾宏 (1535-1615), and his nemesis, the Yangming Confucian Zhou Rudeng 周汝登 (1547-1629), this work confronts long-held scholarly views of Confucian dominance to conclude that many classically educated, elite men found Buddhist practices a far more attractive option. Their intellectual debates, self-cultivation practices, and interpersonal relations helped shape the contours of late sixteenth-century Buddhist culture.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But Lingnan was vastly different from Jiangnan, and so was Deqing's status as an exiled monk different from that of Zhuhong as a master deeply rooted in local society but always respected empire-wide (Yü 2021;Eichman 2016).”
From Struggling to Restore a Lost Identity: Hanshan Deqing’s 憨山德清 (1546–1623) Reforms at Nanhua Temple 南華寺, 1600–1610 (2023) · cites this paper as Eichman 2016
In the citing paper
“Zhuhong's Tract was reprinted more than twenty times, and his lay disciples formed societies that organized regular animal releases, maintained life-releasing ponds, and established sanctuaries for terrestrial animals (Eichman 2016, pp. 122, 172-80, 202-4).”
From Tracing the Influence of Ming-Qing Buddhism in Early Modern Japan: Yunqi Zhuhong’s Tract on Refraining from Killing and on Releasing Life and Ritual Animal Releases (2021) · cites this paper as Eichman 2016
In the citing paper
“In China, longevity had been a primary benefit of life releases from at least the Song into the Ming and Qing dynasties (Eichman 2016, p. 193).”
From Tracing the Influence of Ming-Qing Buddhism in Early Modern Japan: Yunqi Zhuhong’s Tract on Refraining from Killing and on Releasing Life and Ritual Animal Releases (2021) · cites this paper as Eichman 2016, p. 193
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ambros, B. R. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12100889 · Cited by 3
Zhang, D. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14040498 · Cited by 1
Buddhist Historiography: A Tale Of Deception in A Seminal Late Ming Buddhist Letter
Eichman, J. (2018) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/0737769x.2018.1507093 · Cited by 2
Self-citationUntitled work
Katz, P. R. (2019) · Journal of Chinese Religions
Untitled work
Darshani, A. (2021) · Journal of Chinese Religions
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichman, J.
- Corresponding author
- Eichman, Jennifer
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2016-01-19
- OpenAlex
- W4250068375
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Chinese Buddhism, Buddhist precepts, animal welfare, epistolary networks, self-cultivation, intellectual debates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Late Sixteenth-Century Chinese Buddhist Fellowship: Spiritual Ambitions, Intellectual Debates, and Epistolary Connections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/9789004308459
- The paper
- Eichman, J. (2016). A Late Sixteenth-Century Chinese Buddhist Fellowship: Spiritual Ambitions, Intellectual Debates, and Epistolary Connections. BRILL eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004308459