5 A Comparative Approach to Śubhakarasiṃha’s (637–735) “Essentials of Meditation”: Meditation and Precepts in Eighth-Century China
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars have highlighted doctrinal affinity and parallels in ritual practices in manuals attributed to these figures, including the Wuwei sanzang chanyao.
“Indeed, a host of scholars have highlighted their doctrinal affinity as well as parallels in the ritual practices outlined in manuals that are attributed to them, including the aforementioned Wuwei sanzang chanyao.”
From Esoteric, Chan and Vinaya Ties in Tang Buddhism (2021) · cites this paper as Lin 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Esoteric, Chan and Vinaya Ties in Tang Buddhism
Sokolova, A. (2021) · Buddhist Studies Review · doi:10.1558/bsrv.41138
- Authors
- Lin, P.-Y.
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Pei-ying
- ORCID
- Lin, Pei-ying
- Venue
- Chinese and Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Pages
- 121-146
- OpenAlex
- W2597607193
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Keywords
- meditation, precepts, Chinese Buddhism, Indian Buddhist texts, Chinese translation of Buddhist texts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
