Cited by 0Chinese history and philosophyIndian and Buddhist StudiesVietnamese History and Culture Studies

Esoteric, Chan and Vinaya Ties in Tang Buddhism

Open access
Sokolova, Anna·2021·Buddhist Studies Review

Abstract

This paper explores the reconstruction of the ordination platform in the Huishan monastery on Mount Song in 767 in the context of the reinforcement of pro-Buddhist policies at the court of Emperor Daizong (r. 762–779). The vinaya monks and state officials who engaged in this platform’s reconstruction are identified as associates of two prominent monastic figures: Amoghavajra (Bukong jin’gang; 704–774), an Esoteric leader at the imperial court; and Songshan Puji (651–739), regarded as the seventh patriarch in the Northern Chan tradition. The key roles played by disciples of these two masters in the reconstruction of the Huishan platform attest to significant congruence in ritual practices between proponents of the Esoteric and Chan groups in Tang dynasty China, primarily in the areas of precept conferral and monastic ordination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1558/bsrv.41138

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Śubhākarasiṃha met monks linked to the Mount Song community, including Shenxiu's student Jingxian, who lived at Huishan monastery.

    “For instance, Śubhākarasiṃha (Ch.Shanwuwei 善無畏; 637-735), who is regarded as one of the major transmitters of Esoteric teaching from India to China during the Tang era, 10 met a number of monks with links to the Mount Song community, including Shenxiu's student Jingxian 敬賢 (660-722), who was a resident of the Huishan monastery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The fullest accounts of the Huishan platform's reconstruction are a stele inscription in the Songyang shike jiji and Lu Changyuan's record composed in 795.

    “Therefore, the most detailed accounts of the platform's reconstruction are a stele inscription that is included in the Songyang shike jiji 嵩陽石刻集記 (A Collection of Stone Inscriptions from Songyang) under the title 'Songshan Huishansi jietan bei' 嵩山會善寺戒壇碑 ('Stele Inscription on [the Establishment of] the Ordination Platform in the Huishan Monastery on Mount Song') 3 and a text by Lu Changyuan 陸長源 (d”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    According to the stele inscription, the Huishan platform project was initiated and sanctioned by Wang Jin, Du Hongjian, and Yuan Zai, all chief ministers at Daizong's court.

    “According to the stele inscription, the project was initiated and sanctioned by a triumvirate consisting of Wang Jin 王縉 (700-781), Du Hongjian 杜鴻漸 (709-769) and Yuan Zai 元載 (713-777), all of whom were chief ministers at Emperor Daizong's court.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Amoghavajra's biographies indicate that he played a key role in promoting Vajrabodhi's ideas about rituals based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala.

    “Similarly, Amoghavajra's biographies indicate that he played a key role in promoting Vajrabodhi's ideas on ritual practices based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites T 2056 292b28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Orlando 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingcitation

    Amoghavajra became the principal monastic leader at the imperial court under Xuanzong, Suzong, and Daizong.

    “Later, he became the principal monastic leader at the imperial court under three successive emperors -Xuanzong 玄宗 (r.712-756), Suzong 肅宗 (r.756-762) and Daizong.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 49
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The re-establishment of the Huishan monastery ordination platform on Mount Song was omitted from the official Daizong-era record of Buddhist projects, which explains why scholars had previously overlooked it.

    “This was omitted from the Daizong chao zeng sikong dabianzheng guangzhi sanzang heshang biaozhi ji 代宗朝 贈司空大辨正廣智三藏和上表制集(Memorials and Edicts of the Venerable Monk Dabianzheng Guangzhi Trepiṭaka, Bestowed [with the Title] Minister of Works by the Daizong Court), the official record of Daizong's Buddhist construction projects, which explains why it has previously escaped the attention of Buddhist sch”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Śubhākarasiṃha associated with Puji's disciple Shouzhi, on whom he conferred bodhisattva precepts, and with Wengu, a former Songyue monastery resident who helped translate Esoteric scriptures in Chang'an.

    “Śubhākarasiṃha also associated with Puji's disciple Shouzhi 守直 (700-770), on whom he conferred the bodhisattva precepts, 13 and Wengu 溫古 (?-?), a one-time resident of Songyue monastery who assisted the Indian master with his translation of Esoteric scriptures in Chang'an.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The same stele states that the Huishan platform was originally founded by Yixing, a disciple of Vajrabodhi.

    “The same source also asserts that the platform was originally established by the prominent monk Yixing 一 行 (683-727), a disciple of Vajrabodhi (Ch.Jin'gangzhi 金剛智; 671-741), one of the foremost Indian missionaries of Tantric Buddhism in China during the Tang era.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In 755, the Huishan platform was desecrated during An Lushan's rebellion.

    “However, in 755, it was desecrated during the rebellion of General An Lushan 安祿山 (703-757).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Several Song gaoseng zhuan biographies mention ordinations at Huishan, with the first registered case being Yuanxiu, who received full precepts at age twenty.

    “For instance, several monks' biographies in the Song gaoseng zhuan 宋高僧傳 (Biographies of Eminent Monks [Compiled] under the Song Dynasty), compiled by Zanning 贊寜 (919-1001) in the tenth century, mention that such ordinations took place at Huishan, with the first registered case being that of Yuanxiu 圓脩 (735-833), who reportedly received the full precepts at the age of twenty (每年於嵩陽會善寺 納戒).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites T 2061 774c12

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In a lineage chart Li Hua appended to Śubhākarasiṃha's biography, Shenxiu appears directly below Śubhākarasiṃha and Puji below Shenxiu, suggesting close connections among the three.

    “In a lineage chart that the bureaucrat-literatus Li Hua 李華 (707-779) appended to Śubhākarasiṃha's biography, Shenxiu appears directly below Śubhākarasiṃha, and Puji below Shenxiu, 16 which suggests close connections between the three figures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Seven or eight years later, an imperial order sent Amoghavajra to the Hexi Corridor, where General Geshu Han was military governor.

    “Seven or eight years later, an imperial order instructed him to travel to the Hexi Corridor (Hexi zoulang 河西走廊), where the general Geshu Han 哥舒翰 (d.757) was the military governor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Yixing studied Chan meditation with Puji on Mount Song before becoming a disciple of Śubhākarasiṃha and then Vajrabodhi.

    “An adept of both Northern Chan and Esoteric teachings, he studied Chan meditation with Puji on Mount Song before becoming a disciple of Śubhākarasiṃha and then Vajrabodhi.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The three officials commended Amoghavajra to Emperor Daizong and helped secure his place at the heart of the imperial elite.

    “The three officials also commended Amoghavajra to Emperor Daizong and played a key role in securing his place at the heart of the imperial elite.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Yixing, the architect of Huishan's ordination platform, was widely regarded as Śubhākarasiṃha's most outstanding follower.

    “However, it was Yixing, the architect of Huishan's ordination platform, who was widely regarded as Śubhākarasiṃha's most outstanding follower.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Du Hongjian was initiated into the Esoteric tradition by Vajrabodhi and composed Vajrabodhi's biography.

    “For instance, Du Hongjian was not only initiated into the Esoteric tradition by Vajrabodhi but also composed the latter's biography.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Two years later, thirty-seven monks ordained by imperial edict were required to chant the new Sūtra for Humane Kings and perform rituals at the newly established Jin'ge monastery on Mount Wutai.

    “thirty-seven monks were ordained by imperial edict, they were obliged to chant the new version of the Sūtra for Humane Kings and perform the rituals in the newly established Jin'ge monastery 金閣寺 on Mount Wutai.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lehnert 2011 source
    • cites Orzech 1998
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    One of Vajrabodhi's maṇḍalas was used for Yixing's abhiṣeka, after which Yixing reportedly asked Vajrabodhi to translate the relevant manual so the procedures could circulate widely.

    “One of these was used for Yixing's abhiṣeka ceremony (立壇灌頂), 31 after which he reportedly 'entreated [Vajrabodhi] to translate the [relevant] manual [into Chinese], so that the procedures could be circulated [widely]' (請譯流通).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites T 2157 875a20

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites T 2157 875a21

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In serving these rulers, Amoghavajra introduced many rituals based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala and performed them for the imperial family, chief ministers, and military elite.

    “In the course of his service to these rulers, he introduced a wide repertoire of rituals and ceremonies based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala and then performed these rites for members of the imperial family, chief ministers and the military elite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Master Hongzheng is identified as the eighth patriarch and Puji's direct successor in several inscriptions predating the 'Dongjing da Jing'aisi Dazheng chanshi bei', including two compositions by Li Hua from around 754 and 764.

    “For instance, a certain Master Hongzheng 宏正 (弘政; ?-755?) 60 is identified as the eighth patriarch (i.e.Puji's direct successor) in several inscriptions that predate 'Dongjing da Jing'aisi Dazheng chanshi bei', including two compositions by Li Hua 李華 (717?-774?) that date from around 754 and 764.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    According to that inscription, Tanzhen died at Jing'ai monastery in 763, and his remains were buried at Songyue monastery on Mount Song's northern slope in homage to Puji.

    “According to this inscription, although Tanzhen died in the Jing'ai monastery in 763, his remains were buried in the Songyue monastery on the northern slope of Mount Song (葬於嵩嶽寺之北阜) 51 in homage to his master, Puji.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Amoghavajra received full ordination in the Sarvāstivāda tradition from Vajrabodhi at the Guangfu monastery in Luoyang in 724 and thereafter became a renowned expert in Sarvāstivāda vinaya texts.

    “Amoghavajra himself received full ordination in the Sarvāstivāda tradition from his teacher Vajrabodhi at the Guangfu monastery 廣福寺, Luoyang, in 724 and thereafter became a renowned expert in the Sarvāstivāda vinaya texts (善一切有部 律).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Orlando 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    At least three permanent abhiṣeka sanctuaries are known: two at the Daxingshan monastery, built in 763 and 774, and one at the Qinglong monastery, built in 775.

    “However, we also know of at least three permanent examples: two at the Daxingshan monastery (constructed in 763 and 774) and another at the Qinglong monastery 青龍寺 (constructed in 775).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Du Hongjian's inscription for Guangde is lost, so it cannot be known for certain whether it supported Wang Jin's identification of Guangde as the eighth Chan patriarch.

    “Unfortunately, this inscription has been lost, so we cannot know for sure that it corroborated Wang Jin's recent identification of Guangde as the eighth Chan patriarch.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Wang Jin's inscription states that he studied under Puji and was friends with Guangde while he served as a local official in Dengfeng.

    “he states that he studied under Puji and befriended Guangde while serving as a local official in the county of Dengfeng 登封”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites QTW 370.3758

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In the 'Dongjing da Jing'aisi Dazheng chanshi bei', Wang Jin constructs a Chan lineage presenting Tanzhen as a lineal disciple of Guangde, identified as the patriarch who succeeded Puji.

    “In 'Dongjing da Jing'aisi Dazheng chanshi bei', Wang Jin constructs a Chan lineage in which he presents Tanzhen as a lineal disciple of Guangde 廣德 (?-?), who in turn is identified as the Chan patriarch who succeeded Puji (大通傳大照.大照傳廣德.廣德傳大師).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Wang Wei lived as a recluse on Mount Song and associated with several monks connected to Shenxiu and Puji, including Chengru, Yifu, and Jingjue.

    “Wang Wei himself lived as a recluse on Mount Song, during which time he associated with several monks in the orbit of Shenxiu and Puji, including the latter's disciple Chengru 乘如, 65 Yifu 義福 (658-736; a major disciple of Shenxiu who may also have studied under Vajrabodhi) 66 and Jingjue 淨覺 (683-750; a disciple of Shenxiu).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang 2007
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    According to the 'Songshan Huishansi jietan bei', Wang Jin composed his stele inscription for Tanzhen on Mount Song in 769, and Xu Hao transcribed it there later that year.

    “According to the 'Songshan Huishansi jietan bei', Wang Jin composed his stele inscription for Tanzhen on Mount Song in 769 (the fourth year of the Dali era); 53 a certain Xu Hao 徐浩 (703-782) then transcribed the text on the mountain later that year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The monks summoned to oversee Huishan's re-established platform were all vinaya specialists, in addition to their dual affiliation with Northern Chan and Esoteric circles.

    “In addition to their dual affiliation to the aforementioned Northern Chan and Esoteric circles, the monks who were summoned to oversee Huishan's re-established platform were all vinaya specialists.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Xu Hao wrote an epitaph for Du Hongjian after Du's death in 769 and transcribed an epitaph for Amoghavajra in 781.

    “For instance, in addition to transcribing Wang Jin's composition, he wrote an epitaph for Du Hongjian upon the latter's death in 769; and he transcribed an epitaph for Amoghavajra in 781.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    According to the SGSZ, Zangyong came from Mount Song, where he studied under Puji's disciple Huikong.

    “According to this account, Zangyong hailed from Mount Song, where he studied under Puji's disciple Huikong 慧空 (696-773/4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SGSZ

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Uchida Seiichi asserts that Chengru studied under Puji on Mount Song before being summoned to the Anguo monastery and then to the Ximing monastery in Chang'an, where he worked with Yuanzhao on major translation projects.

    “Uchida asserts that Chengru studied under Puji on Mount Song before imperial edicts summoned him first to the Anguo monastery 安國寺 71 and then to the Ximing monastery 西明寺 in Chang'an, where he worked alongside Yuanzhao 圓照 (718-800), a disciple and biographer of Amoghavajra, on a series of major translation projects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Uchida 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The Guangfu monastery, where Vajrabodhi lived until his death in 741, had a stūpa chapel commissioned by Emperor Xuanzong for Vajrabodhi and another chapel housing an old stone ordination platform in accordance with the Sarvāstivāda tradition.

    “This monastery, where Vajrabodhi resided until his death in 741, had a stūpa chapel (tayuan 塔院, Skt.caitya) that Emperor Xuanzong commissioned specifically for Vajrabodhi as well as another chapel that housed an old stone ordination platform, in accordance with the Sarvāstivāda tradition (一切有部古石戒壇院).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites T 2120

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites T 2157

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Huishan platform was used as a venue for full monastic ordinations, and the monks who supervised its activities from 767 onwards were vinaya specialists.

    “Finally, it should be remembered that the Huishan platform was also used as a venue for full monastic ordinations (upasaṃpadās), and that the monks who supervised its activities from 767 onwards were vinaya specialists.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Daizong granted this request in 771, and two years later Amoghavajra's disciple Tanzhen oversaw the construction of a similar, identically named structure in the Cien monastery.

    “Suzong's successor Daizong finally granted this request in 771, 82 and two years later Amoghavajra's prominent disciple Tanzhen 曇貞 (fl.724-777) 83 oversaw the construction of a similar and identically named structure in the Cien monastery 慈恩寺.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites T 2120

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites T 2057

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    767 was also the year the Huishan ordination platform was re-established.

    “Of course, this was also the year that the Huishan ordination platform was re-established.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    There are striking parallels between Amoghavajra's description of Guangfu's stone platform and the accounts of Huishan's ordination platform: both were destroyed during An Lushan's rebellion, and each was overseen by seven vinaya monks who supervised the annual erection of ritual altars.

    “There are striking parallels between Amoghavajra's description of Guangfu's stone platform and the accounts of Huishan's ordination platform in the 'Songshan Huishansi jietan bei' and the 'Songshan Huishansi jietan ji'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Xu Hao belonged to the triumvirate's faction and often served the three officials as calligrapher and author.

    “A member of the triumvirate (元載王縉之黨), 55 Xu Hao often served the three officials as both a calligrapher and an author.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites ZZTJ 224.3352

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    During Daizong's reign, a number of Puji's disciples participated in the reconstruction of Huishan's platform, a project initiated by Amoghavajra, along with other pro-Esoteric schemes such as the annual construction of abhiṣeka sanctuaries.

    “Subsequently, during the reign of Emperor Daizong, a number of Puji's disciples participated in the reconstruction of Huishan's platform -a project that was the brainchild of Vajrabodhi's disciple, Amoghavajra -along with other pro-Esoteric schemes, such as the annual construction of abhiṣeka sanctuaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    According to his biographer Zhao Qian, Amoghavajra was for many years the only Sarvāstivāda vinaya master in China, where he personally ordained twenty thousand disciples in his preferred tradition.

    “According to his biographer Zhao Qian 趙遷 (?-?), for many years Amoghavajra was the only Sarvāstivāda vinaya master in China, where he personally ordained twenty thousand disciples in his preferred tradition (其登 戒壇.二千弟子.一切有部.獨爲宗).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites T 2056

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The affiliations of historical figures in these formations can be defined by their Esoteric and/or Chan lineages and their level of vinaya expertise.

    “The affiliations of particular historical figures within these formations may then be defined on the basis of their Esoteric and/or Chan lineages, 7 as well as their level of expertise in vinaya.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Esoteric and Northern Chan monks, as well as imperial elite members, all had key roles in re-establishing the Huishan ordination platform.

    “Overall, then, it seems that both Esoteric and Northern Chan monks, as well as members of the imperial elite, had key roles to play in the re-establishment of the ordination platform at Huishan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At least two attendants of the Huishan platform were affiliated with both the Northern Chan group on Mount Song and Amoghavajra's Esoteric circle, suggesting considerable affinity between these traditions in ritual practices including precept conferral.

    “At least two of the platform's attendants were affiliated with both the 'Northern Chan' group on Mount Song and Amoghavajra's Esoteric intimate circle, which suggests considerable affinity between these two 'traditions' in their ritual practices, including precept conferral.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Scholars have highlighted doctrinal affinity and parallels in ritual practices in manuals attributed to these figures, including the Wuwei sanzang chanyao.

    “Indeed, a host of scholars have highlighted their doctrinal affinity as well as parallels in the ritual practices outlined in manuals that are attributed to them, including the aforementioned Wuwei sanzang chanyao.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lin 2017 source
    • cites Pinte 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Full monastic ordination was the standard procedure by which novices entered the saṅgha in the presence of officials, conducted on a platform called a jietan.

    “Full monastic ordination (upasaṃpadā) -the standard procedure by which novices were accepted into the saṅgha in the presence of officials -was also conducted on a platform, in this case known as a jietan.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In Esoteric Buddhism, tan also refers to a ritual sanctuary or maṇḍala, called daochang or tanchang in Tang Esoteric sources.

    “In Esoteric Buddhism, the term tan is also used in reference to a ritual sanctuary, or maṇḍala (mantuluo 曼 荼羅), which may be designated as either a daochang 道塲 (ritual sanctuary) or a tanchang 壇 場 (ritual altar) in Tang dynasty Esoteric sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The Vajradhātu Maṇḍala is based on the Vajraśekhara Sūtra, one of the texts Vajrabodhi brought to China in 723.

    “The Vajradhātu Maṇḍala is based on the Vajraśekhara Sūtra (Jin'gangding jing 金剛頂 經; T 848), one of the texts that Vajrabodhi brought to China in 723.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Indian Esoteric masters introduced this type of maṇḍala to China in the early eighth century, after which it was soon used in bodhisattva precepts conferral.

    “Indian Esoteric masters introduced this type of maṇḍala to China in the early eighth century, after which it was soon employed in the conferral of the bodhisattva precepts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If the other maṇḍalas were also Vajradhātu-based, then Vajrabodhi and Yixing's collaboration on consecration platforms and the Vajraśekhara Sūtra plausibly began a significant expansion of Vajradhātu Maṇḍala rituals throughout the Tang Empire.

    “If that were indeed the case, it is plausible that Vajrabodhi and Yixing's collaboration on the establishment of these consecration platforms and their translation of the Vajraśekhara Sūtra marked the beginning of a significant expansion in rituals based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala throughout the Tang Empire.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Several of Puji's disciples were closely associated with the imperial officials who initiated the Huishan project and also played key roles in some of Amoghavajra's other schemes.

    “As we shall see, several of Puji's disciples were not only closely associated with the imperial officials who initiated this project but also played key roles in some of Amoghavajra's other schemes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Later, under Amoghavajra, these rites were disseminated more widely and became institutionalized.

    “Later, under the auspices of another disciple of Vajrabodhi, Amoghavajra, these rites were disseminated even more widely and became institutionalized.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Amoghavajra was a strong advocate of the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala, which suggests that he and his imperial patrons gave priority to rebuilding Yixing's Huishan platform.

    “Clearly, then, Amoghavajra was a strong advocate of the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala, which suggests that he and his imperial patrons prioritized the reconstruction of Yixing's platform in the Huishan monastery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because Yixing's Huishan platform was based on the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala, the other maṇḍalas may also have been based on it.

    “However, given that the platform founded by Yixing in the Huishan monastery was based on that maṇḍala, it may have been that the others were, too.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This phrase refers to the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala, which has five sections dedicated to the Five Buddhas: Akṣobhya, Amitābha, Ratnasaṃbhava, Amoghasiddhi, and Mahāvairocana.

    “This is a reference to the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala, which consists of five sections (or divisions) dedicated to the Five Buddhas: Akṣobhya, Amitābha, Ratnasaṃbhava, Amoghasiddhi, and the central deity Mahāvairocana.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Daoxuan envisioned an ordination platform as a five-tier structure serving as a divine location for the Buddha's presence, a notion paralleling the symbolism and structure of the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala in abhiṣeka.

    “Indeed, Daoxuan 道宣 (596-667), an eminent vinaya reformer and the initiator of a 'platform movement' in China, envisioned an ordination platform as a five-tier structure that would serve as a divine location for the Buddha's presence 42a notion that has clear parallels with both the symbolism and the structural arrangement of the Vajradhātu Maṇḍala during the abhiṣeka ritual.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacRae 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The budgets for these construction projects and ceremonies were enormous, and the saṅgha's power and authority rose to unprecedented levels under the triumvirate's patronage.

    “The budgets for these construction projects and the lavish ceremonies that were held at the completed venues were enormous, and the saṅgha's power and authority rose to unprecedented levels under the triumvirate's patronage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The consensus is that these groups developed similar techniques, especially in meditation and bodhisattva precepts conferral.

    “The consensus is that they developed a number of similar techniques, especially with regard to meditation and the conferral of the bodhisattva precepts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sharf 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    'Platform' and 'ordination platform' are debated terms for structures that hosted various rituals across Tang China, most notably bodhisattva precepts conferral.

    “'Platform' (tan 壇) and 'ordination platform' (jietan 戒壇) are highly debated and contested terms for structures that hosted a variety of rituals across Tang China,foot_4 most notably the conferral of the bodhisattva precepts upon large groups of laypeople and monastics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    It is generally accepted that bodhisattva precepts conferral was a relatively common ceremony widely adopted by Chan and Esoteric devotees.

    “It is generally accepted that the latter was a relatively common ceremony that was widely adopted and performed by Chan as well as Esoteric devotees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Esoteric masters active at the imperial court widely disseminated abhiṣeka as a standard initiation into Esoteric teaching.

    “Esoteric masters who were active in the imperial court widely disseminated this ritual as a standard initiation into Esoteric teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Like Chengru, Zangyong had close ties both to the Chan monastic community on Mount Song and to Amoghavajra's Esoteric circle in Chang'an.

    “Clearly, then, like Chengru, Zangyong had close ties to both the Chan monastic community on Mount Song and Amoghavajra's Esoteric circle in Chang'an.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Standard full monastic ordination was typically conferred according to the Dharmaguptaka vinaya, which had become the pre-eminent vinaya manual by the Tang dynasty.

    “The standard full monastic ordination was typically conferred according to the precepts of the Dharmaguptaka vinaya, 89 a text that had become the pre-eminent vinaya manual by the Tang dynasty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sato 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Huishan platform was used for various ceremonies, perhaps including Esoteric rituals, bodhisattva precepts, and full monastic ordinations, until it was destroyed during An Lushan's rebellion in 755; it was restored twelve years later as part of a national construction project devised by Emperor Daizong, his chief ministers, and Amoghavajra to bolster Esoteric Buddhism and related ritual pract

    “Thereafter, the platform was used for a variety of ceremonies, perhaps including Esoteric rituals, the conferral of the bodhisattva precepts and full monastic ordinations, until its destruction during An Lushan's rebellion in 755.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because these monks were all vinaya experts, it is highly likely that they officiated at all of the platforms' vinaya ceremonies, including ordinations, and probably also delivered sermons.

    “Given that these monks were all vinaya experts, it seems highly likely that they officiated at all of the platforms' vinaya ceremonies, such as the conferral of ordinations, and probably also delivered sermons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Huishan's ordination platform exemplified the full complexity of the religious landscape on Mount Song and served as a meeting point for Esoteric and Northern Chan groups who played key roles in both the formulation and implementation of Emperor Daizong's pro-Buddhist policies.

    “In conclusion, then, Huishan's ordination platform was a structure that exemplified the full complexity of the religious landscape on Mount Song and served as a meeting point for Esoteric and Northern Chan groups who played key roles in both the formulation and the implementation of Emperor Daizong's pro-Buddhist policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These monks' close ties to Esoteric masters and their consequent proximity to the imperial elite explain the formation and legitimization of their branch of the Chan lineage and the identification of two of Puji's disciples as new Chan patriarchs under pro-Esoteric ministers.

    “In addition, these monks' close ties to Esoteric masters, and their consequent proximity to the imperial elite, explains the formation and subsequent legitimization of their particular branch of the Chan lineage and the identification of two of Puji's disciples as new Chan patriarchs under the auspices of pro-Esoteric ministers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Du Hongjian's agreement to write the inscription is further evidence that he, Wang Jin, and Xu Hao were leading figures in a campaign to elevate Tanzhen and Guangde as Chan patriarchs, to support other Puji disciples, and to promote Amoghavajra's projects, including the Jin'ge monastery on Mount Wutai and the restoration of the Huishan ordination platform.

    “However, the simple fact that Du Hongjian agreed to write it serves as further evidence that he, Wang Jin and Xu Hao were prime movers in a campaign to elevate Tanzhen and Guangde to the status of Chan patriarch and supported other disciples of Puji while simultaneously championing Amoghavajra and his large-scale projects, including the establishment of the Jin'ge monastery on Mount Wutai and the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All of this suggests a close affinity between Esoteric and Northern Chan ordinations, both of which may have been conducted in accordance with the Sarvāstivāda tradition, as well as the possible use of the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya as an ordination manual in the Huishan monastery.

    “All of this suggests a close affinity between Esoteric and Northern Chan ordinations, both of which may have been conducted in accordance with the Sarvāstivāda tradition, as well as the possible use of the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya as an ordination manual in the Huishan monastery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    From this, one may surmise that Wang Jin considered Guangde the eighth patriarch and Tanzhen the ninth.

    “From it, we may surmise that Wang Jin considered Guangde as the eighth patriarch and Tanzhen as the ninth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The term tanchang is surely synonymous with the previously mentioned ritual sanctuaries, daochang.

    “a term that is surely synonymous with the aforementioned 'ritual sanctuaries' (daochang 道塲).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
65 of 65
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Chengru who requested the restoration of Huishan's ordination platform is the same Chengru who was summoned to the Daxingshan monastery in 764.

    “If we assume that this was the same Chengru who requested the restoration of Huishan's ordination platform”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Amoghavajra intended to revive Sarvāstivāda ordinations at Guangfu and wished to install monks who were fellow Sarvāstivāda vinaya adepts.

    “it is logical to assume that he intended to revive Sarvāstivāda ordinations at Guangfu and wished to install monks who were fellow Sarvāstivāda vinaya adepts.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Du Hongjian is credited with an inscription after his death

    Major

    The paper dates Du Hongjian's death to 769 but says he composed an inscription in 772. Both dates cannot apply to that authorship claim.

  • Shenxiu has two birth years

    Minor

    One passage gives Shenxiu's birth year as 607; another gives it as 606.

  • Ordination count differs from the quoted Chinese

    Minor

    The English states twenty thousand disciples, but the Chinese passage supplied for the claim says 二千, or two thousand.

  • Li Hua has conflicting life dates

    Minor

    The paper gives Li Hua's dates as 707-779 in one passage and approximately 717-774 in another.

  • A citation to Uchida falls outside the listed article

    Minor

    The citation specifies page 60, whereas the reference entry gives pages 33-47 for Uchida's 2006 article.

  • The conclusion places two monks' collaboration after their deaths

    Minor

    The conclusion places Shenxiu and Puji's collaboration during Suzong's reign, which the paper dates to 756-762. It elsewhere gives their death years as 706 and 739, respectively.

  • A citation to Lin falls outside the listed article

    Minor

    The paper cites page 122 of Lin's 2017 work, but its reference entry lists that article on pages 156-194.

7 of 7

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Enomoto, Fumio. 2000. 'Mūlasarvāstivādin and Sarvāstivādin'. In Vividharatnakarandaka: Festgabe für Adelheid Mette, ed. Christine Chojnacki, Jens-Uwe Hartmann and Volker M. Tschannerl, 239-250. Indica et Tibetica Vol. 37. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica.
  2. ________. 2004. 'The Acceptance of Buddhist Precepts by the Chinese in the Fifth Century'. Journal of Asian History 38.2, 97-120.
  3. Groner, Paul. 1990. 'The Ordination Ritual in the Platform Sutra within the Context of the East Asian Buddhist Vinaya Tradition'. In Fo Kuang Shan Report of International Conference on Ch'an Buddhism, 220-250. Kaohsiung: Fo Kuang.
  4. Shinohara, Koichi. 2014. Spells, Images, and Maṇḍalas: Tracing the Evolution of Esoteric Buddhist Rituals. New York: Columbia University Press.
  5. Weinstein, Stanley. 1987. Buddhism under the T'ang. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Ye Feng 叶封, ed. 1979. 'Songyang shike jiji 嵩陽石刻集記' [A Collection of Stone Inscriptions from Songyang]. In Shike shiliao xinbian 石刻史料新編 [New Edition of Historical Materials Carved on Stone]. Vol. 2, 10179-10245. Taibei: Xinwenfeng chubanshe 新文豐出版社.
  7. Yifa. 2002. The Origins of Buddhist Monastic Codes in China: An Annotated Translation and Study of the Chanyuan Qinggui. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.

Authors
Sokolova, A.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Sokolova, Anna
Venue
Buddhist Studies Review
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
37
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0265-2897 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-9681
OpenAlex
W3112587661
Cited by
0
References
22
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Buddhist Studies Review (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Keywords
esoteric Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, Buddhist monastic discipline, monastic ordination, Amoghavajra, ritual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-04.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-04.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review