Gauging us and eu Seal Regimes in the Arctic against Inuit Sovereignty
Open accessAbstract
Directive 66/Homeland Security Presidential Directive 25 (2009).The first federal policy addressing
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MMPA affects the ability of Indigenous Peoples to sell marine mammal products through importation bans.
“The MMPA also affects the ability of Indigenous Peoples to sell marine mammal products through importation banswhich some consider a human rights issue (Lynge, 1995) and violation of Indigenous sovereignty (Fakhri, 2017).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Fakhri, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Jean L. Cohen, 'Whose Sovereignty? Empire Versus International Law' (2004) 18(3) Ethics & International Affairs 1; Antony Anghie, 'Rethinking Sovereignty in International Law' (2009) 5(1) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 291;
- Martti Koskenniemi, 'What Use for Sovereignty Today?' (2011) 1(1) Asian Journal of International Law 61; Betsy Baker, 'International Law and the Arctic: How Territoriality, Human Rights, and Sovereignty Can Shape Sovereignty' in Robert W Murray and Anita Dey Nuttall (eds), International Relations and the Arctic: Understanding Policy and Governance (Cambria Press 2014);
- David S. Case and David A. Voluck, Alaska Natives and American Laws (3rd ed, University of Alaska Press 2012) 24-33.
- Sophie Theriault and others, 'The Legal Protection of Subsistence: A Prerequisite of Food Security for the Inuit of Alaska' (2005) 22(1) Alaska Law Review 35. 49
- Eric Smith, 'Some Thoughts on Comanagement' (1996) 4(1) Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 1.
- Elizaveta Barrett Ristroph, 'Alaska Tribes' Melting Subsistence Rights' (2010) 1(1) Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 47, 71-72.
- Chanda L. Meek, 'Comparing Marine Mammal Co-Management Regimes in Alaska: Three Aspects of Institutional Performance' (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Alaska 2009) <http://www.uaf.edu/files/rap/Meek%20dissertation%2009.pdf> accessed 2 August 2016; Ristroph, n. 85 above. 90 See Anderson, n. 42 above. 91 Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 1007/2009 on trade in seal products, [2009] OJ L286/36 (Basic Regulation). The exceptions are contained in Commission Regulation (EU) No. 737/2010 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Regulation (EC) No. 1007/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on trade in seal products, [2010] OJ L216/1 [Implementing Regulation]. Michael Fakhri -9789004349179 Downloaded from Brill.com07/11/2023 09:02:06PM via free access Others have pointed out that not only did the European and WTO courts have ample evidence that seals did not necessarily suffer in the hunts, but that the EU legislation was disconnected from scientific and social reality of seal hunt- ing communities.103 The EU's position that the legislation's purpose was to Ban on the Import of Seal Products and the WTO Regulations: Neglected Human Rights of the Arctic Indigenous Peoples?' (2013) 49(2) Polar Record 154.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fakhri, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fakhri, Michael
- ORCID
- Fakhri, Michael
- Venue
- The European Union and the Arctic
- Publisher
- Brill | Nijhoff
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Pages
- 200-235
- OpenAlex
- W2754546474
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- sealing, Arctic, indigenous rights, federal policy, homeland security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
