Cited by 99Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyCultural and Mythological StudiesClassical Antiquity Studies

Hathor and Thoth: Two Key Figures of the Ancient Egyptian Religion

Bleeker·1973·BRILL eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004378445

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the religious textual corpora, Thoth and the moon god Iah are two different deities, albeit they share similarities.

    “In the religious textual corpora, Thoth (Ḏḥwty) and the moon god Iah are two different deities (Bleeker 1973, 156; García Fernández 2017, 49), albeit they share similarities.”

    From The Kingship and the Moon from the Late 17th to Early 18th Dynasties (2024) · cites this paper as Bleeker 1973, 156

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bleeker
Corresponding author
Bleeker
Venue
BRILL eBooks
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1973-01-01
OpenAlex
W4236508024
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Hathor, Thoth, Egyptian deities, Egyptian mythology, ancient Egyptian religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review