The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History
Abstract
This book provides a new hypothesis for understanding the real nature of the term White Lotus Teachings. The author argues that there are actually two different phenomena covered by similar terms: from c. 1130 until 1400, a real lay Buddhist movement existed, which can be called the White Lotus movement. It enjoyed the respect of contemporary literati and religious elites. The movement used the autonym White Lotus Society, which came to be prohibited in the early Ming and was discarded as a result. After 1525, the name reappeared in the form White Lotus Teachings, but now only as a derogatory label, used by officials and literati rather than by believers themselves. As a result of this hypothesis, the history of the "White Lotus Teachings" changes from one of religious groups and magicians into one of elite ideology and religious persecution. The book is therefore important both for historians and anthropologists of Chinese religion and society, and for comparative historians interested in the ideological and social construction of "heterodoxy".
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both Baozhi and Sengqie were also closely associated with Guanyin. 44”
From The Sutra of the Five Lords : Manuscript and oral tradition (2015) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Surplus of Men, A Deficit of Peace: Security and Sex Ratios in Asia's Largest States
Hudson, V. M., & Boer, A. D. (2002) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228802753696753 · Cited by 277
Falun Gong and the Future of China
Ownby, D. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329056.001.0001 · Cited by 129
Is Religious Violence Inevitable?
Wellman, J. K., & Tokuno, K. (2004) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00234.x · Cited by 111
The Heaven and Earth Society as Popular Religion
Ownby, D. (1995) · The Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.2307/2059958 · Cited by 94
Bryant, J. M. (2006) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1353/cjs.2006.0066 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- ter Haar, B.
- Corresponding author
- ter Haar, Barend
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2037432765
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Chinese religious history, heterodoxy, religious persecution, elite ideology, Ming dynasty, literati, social construction of religion, Chinese Buddhism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review