The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On Some Dog, Snake and Scorpion Incantations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eagle and the Snake, or anzû and bašmu?: Another Mythological Dimension in the Epic of Etana
Valk, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.4.0889 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkel, I. L.
- Corresponding author
- Finkel, Irving L.
- Venue
- Mesopotamian Magic: Textual, Historical and Interpretative Perspectives
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Pages
- 213-250
- OpenAlex
- W4247891822
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
- Keywords
- incantations, dogs, snakes, scorpions, magic, folk medicine, folk beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
