The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sur L’Authenticité du ta Tch’Eng K’I Sin Louen
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Commentaries on the Scripture of Benevolent Kings ( Renwang bore jing 仁 王 般若 經 ) by Guanding 灌 頂 (561-632) and Jizang 吉 藏 (549-623) include sericulture in a list of twenty-eight offenses against the Buddhadharma”
From For a Compassionate Killing: Chinese Buddhism, Sericulture, and the Silkworm God AŚvaghoṣa (2013) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loewe, M. (1986) · The Cambridge History of China · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243278.015 · Cited by 30
Philosophy and religion from Han to Sui
Demiéville, P. (1986) · The Cambridge History of China · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243278.018 · Cited by 18
Self-citationFor a Compassionate Killing: Chinese Buddhism, Sericulture, and the Silkworm God AŚvaghoṣa
Young, S. H. (2013) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1179/0737769x13z.0000000002 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Demiéville, P.
- Corresponding author
- Demiéville, Paul
- Venue
- Choix d'études bouddhiques (1929-1970)
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1973-01-01
- Pages
- 1-78
- OpenAlex
- W632754047
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- authenticity, textual authenticity, textual criticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
