Cited by 21Indian and Buddhist StudiesWar, Ethics, and JustificationIndian History and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aspects of the Buddhist Attitude Towards War

Schmithausen, Lambert·1999·Violence Denied

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004644809_005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-violence is central to Buddhist identity, and the precept against killing is a prerequisite for belonging to any Buddhist community, whether monastic or lay.

    “Non-violence is by no means incidental to Buddhist identity. The regular observance of five precepts, beginning with the precept to avoid killing, is a prerequisite for belonging to any Buddhist community, either as a monk or as a layperson.”

    From War Magic And Just War in Indian Tantric Buddhism (2016) · cites this paper as Schmithausen (1999: 45)

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmithausen, L.
Corresponding author
Schmithausen, Lambert
Venue
Violence Denied
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1999-01-01
Pages
45-67
OpenAlex
W4392670477
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Indian History and Philosophy
Keywords
Buddhism, war, Buddhist ethics, pacifism, nonviolence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review